pick yer mods!

Klint, JJ and Beardguy57

Quote:

antoine said:
Klint, JJ and Beardguy57

You forgot Rob.

John Byrne!

Matt Damon!

We need a Jedi to be a mod here!

No mod.

here's the current tallies:

so if voting ended today, the mods would be: uschi, sneaky, and som, r3x, or doc (who would have a second round of campaigning for the florida-like debacle)

i can't believe uschi received 1,111,111,111,111 votes!

list of those who have voted:

voting ends sunday, december 3, at 11:59 pm est, so you still have nearly 60 hours to let your voice be heard!

If you don't vote,you don't get the right to bitch.

allan, this is the rkmbs -- everything grants the right to bitch!

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
here's the current tallies:
r3x29yz4a - 11111
misterjla - 111
son of mxy - 11111
WBAM - 1111
pariah - 111
no moderator - 1111111
MEM - 1
Uschi - 1111111111111
PJP - 111
Sneaky - 1111111111
Mxy - 1
Thedoctor - 11111

so if voting ended today, the mods would be: uschi, sneaky, and som, r3x, or doc (who would have a second round of campaigning for the florida-like debacle)

Since "no mod" outpolled every option but sneaky and Uschi, why not just have those two as mods and call it a day?

Wait a tic here...There's something wrong with this voting process. I thought it was a joint campaign, not just an individual turnout.

See what happens when you attempt things that you're ill equipped for?

must we talk about pariah's genitals again?

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
here's the current tallies:
r3x29yz4a - 11111
misterjla - 111
son of mxy - 11111
WBAM - 1111
pariah - 111
no moderator - 1111111
MEM - 1
Uschi - 1111111111111
PJP - 111
Sneaky - 1111111111
Mxy - 1
Thedoctor - 11111

so if voting ended today, the mods would be: uschi, sneaky, and som, r3x, or doc (who would have a second round of campaigning for the florida-like debacle)

Since "no mod" outpolled every option but sneaky and Uschi, why not just have those two as mods and call it a day?

but dear lawd how does that help you? the cripple and the hermaphrodite are not conversative.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Since "no mod" outpolled every option but sneaky and Uschi, why not just have those two as mods and call it a day?

the option to have no moderator would have to be the majority vote recipient for it to have value. those who voted for "no mod" don't want any mod -- having 2 or 3 wouldn't make a difference.

Quote:

Pariah said:
I thought it was a joint campaign, not just an individual turnout.

tis individual

I think there's a sampling/statistical problem here, Rob.

Each person gets, by your count, three votes, correct?

So, for example, I could, if I wanted mods, vote for (for example) Uschi, Sneaky and Pariah. I'd get three votes.

However, a person who wants "no mods" only gets one vote.

So, to be fair, shouldn't each "no mod" vote count three times?

no.

every person has an opportunity to vote. you can pick no mod, or you can pick a mod (or two or three). as of the above post, 7 people voted for no mod, and 13 voted for uschi.

that means, as of that post, there are more people who want uschi to be a mod than there are people who want no mods.

In that case, I should be able to add two more votes to my "no mod" vote, yes?

r3x29yz4a and doc, then.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
no.

every person has an opportunity to vote. you can pick no mod, or you can pick a mod (or two or three). as of the above post, 7 people voted for no mod, and 13 voted for uschi.

that means, as of that post, there are more people who want uschi to be a mod than there are people who want no mods.

However, the person who wants, for example, Uschi, also gets two more votes for two additional mods, for a total of three votes.

The person who wants "no mods" only gets that one vote.

Really, the proper way to do this would have been to first poll "should there be a mod". Then, if the "yes" votes outweighed the "no" votes, proceed to a question of how many mods. Then, once the number was selected, people would vote on who those mods should be.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Yes, but the person who wants, for example, Uschi, also gets two more votes for two additional mods.

The person who wants "no mods" only gets that one vote.

but you'd either vote to have mods or vote against, wouldn't you?

13 people have thus far waived their option to vote for no mod, and instead, chose to vote for a mod; uschi.

why would the 7 current "no mod" votes get to equal the majority, 21, when the majority have thus far opted to have mods?

As noted above, Really, the proper way to do this would have been to first poll "should there be a mod". Then, if the "yes" votes outweighed the "no" votes, proceed to a question of how many mods. Then, once the number was selected, people would vote on who those mods should be.

i ... really didn't think this would be so complicated.

the answer above that i gave to your post that...no... longer exists is pretty straight forward. currently, more people want a mod than no mod. thats it.

There are people in elections offices laughing at you right now, Rob.

Even in Florida

Okay, so now that it has been decreed that there are to be mods and, apparently, three mods, do those of us who voted "no mod" get to go back and recast our votes? And, if so, do we get three votes or just our remaining two votes?

the election is over on sunday, florida.

I take that to mean, yes, we can rescind our "no mod" votes and recast them for three mods.

it means the election isn't over yet, and more people could vote for no mod. or whoever.

this really needs this level of clarification?

*sigh*

Quote:

the G-man said:

I'm not sure why you would object to my questions, Doc.

As it stands, you're in a tie for third place. If, as I theorized, those of us who voted for "no mods" are able to change their votes between now and Sunday, there's a good chance at least some of those votes would go to you, thereby increasing your chance of taking third place.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
Quote:

Pariah said:
I thought it was a joint campaign, not just an individual turnout.

tis individual

If I knew that, I just would have voted for myself! Or maybe Mxy.

You didn't specify dammit!

I agree with G-man.

If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods. I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Okay, so now that it has been decreed that there are to be mods and, apparently, three mods, do those of us who voted "no mod" get to go back and recast our votes? And, if so, do we get three votes or just our remaining two votes?

uh no. as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
]as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods.

No.

A "single vote" for "no mods" is just that. One vote. "No Mod" gets one vote and only one, from that voter. That voter gets one vote.

In contrast, a "single vote" for a slate of mods (for example: Uschi, Sneaky, Doc) results in three votes from a voter: One for Uschi, one for Sneaky, one for Doc. Each of which goes towards that person's total number of votes.

Quote:

I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.

Of course you care. We all care. Otherwise, (a) we wouldn't vote; (b) you wouldn't have run.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
Quote:

the G-man said:
Okay, so now that it has been decreed that there are to be mods and, apparently, three mods, do those of us who voted "no mod" get to go back and recast our votes? And, if so, do we get three votes or just our remaining two votes?

uh no. as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

But Rob just said that the votes were for individual mods. If it was one vote for three people, then that means the votes should be tallied as a vote for those three, not three votes respectively split up between the three individuals.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods. I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.

He's rather anxious in making sure we know he doesn't care.

Seems li'l disingenuious.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
]as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods.

No.

A "single vote" for "no mods" is just that. One vote. "No Mod" gets one vote and only one, from that voter. That voter gets one vote.

In contrast, a "single vote" for a slate of mods (for example: Uschi, Sneaky, Doc) results in three votes from a voter: One for Uschi, one for Sneaky, one for Doc. Each of which goes towards that person's total number of votes.

rob's right, i don't see how this could unclear.

if those who wanted no mods wanted to vote for mods they wouldn't of voted for no mods.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
]as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods.

No.

A "single vote" for "no mods" is just that. One vote. "No Mod" gets one vote and only one, from that voter. That voter gets one vote.

In contrast, a "single vote" for a slate of mods (for example: Uschi, Sneaky, Doc) results in three votes from a voter: One for Uschi, one for Sneaky, one for Doc. Each of which goes towards that person's total number of votes.

rob's right, i don't see how this could unclear.

if those who wanted no mods wanted to vote for mods they wouldn't of voted for no mods.

But that's not exactly fair though. Technically, "No Mod" should get three votes if Rob is going to allow us to vote three times.

I actually think we should vote once for just a certain set of mods, but if we're gonna havta vote this way, then it's more fair that a vote for "No mod" be proportionate to a vote for three people.

While I understand that Rob is more concerned with a stacked conglomeration of equally distributed votes, I think the set up is flawed for the reasons G-man pointed out.

Quote:

Pariah & G-Man said:

Quote:

Prometheus said:
Quote:

Pariah & G-Man said:

If you voted for no mod, you get two more votes, methinks.

By getting 3 votes when there will be only 2 mods you're telling people to vote for thier 3 top choices knowing that they'll only get at best 2 of those choices. So if your top choice is "no mod" then you should also get to vote for two mods. The vote would be saying this "I would prefer to have no mods, but if there are going to be mods I would prefer it to be one or both of the following people" So if you voted "no mod" then just vote two more times and if Rob chooses not to count those additional votes I would be interested in hearing how it's "not fair".

He's already told you.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:

rob's right, i don't see how this could unclear.

if those who wanted no mods wanted to vote for mods they wouldn't of voted for no mods.

That's easy for you to say. You're in second place. You're getting what you want.

Now I'll argue for what I want. G-man's right, there should have been two elections. One for whether or not there would be mods, and one for who those mods should be (in that order for obvious reasons). Principally, those are two separate issues--the existence of mods and who, if any, those mods should be. It's akin to asking us how many AND who on the same ballot. In fact, that's exactly what it is. So, yeah, I'm not even concerned about how much one should weigh in comparison to another, per se, cuz it's apples and oranges.

But whatever. Seems the majority DO want mods (though I wonder if that would have been the case had the question been asked the way G-man proposed). Still, I've believed from the start that this should be Rob's decision. His boards, his rules. If this is the way he wants it, cool. I've added my two other votes already. I just hope they'll be considered, since I obviously didn't know the rules beforehand.

If you understood the rules going in why should a "No Mod" voter get special treatment then the rest of us? Did any of the disenfranchised feel that they would get to vote twice if "no mod" looked like it wasn't going to win the first time they voted???

Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:

So if you voted "no mod" then just vote two more times and if Rob chooses not to count those additional votes I would be interested in hearing how it's "not fair".

Well, in essence, to make his or her vote count as much as the next person, a person who believes this forum shouldn't have mods would have to put down TWO votes for mods who he doesn't even want against his ONE vote against having any mods. In that case, for us all to be equal, the vote for no mods has to fail by at least two to one.

Which, again, is why this system is fundamentally flawed.

Yes.

Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
If you understood the rules going in why should a "No Mod" voter get special treatment then the rest of us? Did any of the disenfranchised feel that they would get to vote twice if "no mod" looked like it wasn't going to win the first time they voted???

Speaking for myself, I didn't feel disenfranchised until Rob's count illustrated why this doesn't really work. And, really, I'm still willing to go this way if Rob thinks it's best.

John Byrne
John Byrne
&
John Byrne!

Thats my three votes!

This is technically what you all want, just all rolled into one. You vote for mod or no mod and if you want a mod you also vote for the choices available. Nobody said you COULDN'T say

Quote:

I vote no mod. in the case that this fails, here are the mods I would prefer.

so do it and let Rob decide. Like Wednesday did a page and a half ago that got totally jumped over in the conversation until just a post or two ago.

Besides, it is just a message board moderator for one forum. Since G-Man's not in the running I really don't think there's anything to fear of someone going overboard. I, for one, am proposing a light moderating example with a minimum of effort. I have a goddamn life, you know? And it isn't like a moderator has SO MUCH POWER! Christ, they won't bomb the UN. This isn't an earth-shattering vote. This is like voting for the kind of pizza you and your friends are going to buy.

Quote:

Wednesday said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
If you understood the rules going in why should a "No Mod" voter get special treatment then the rest of us? Did any of the disenfranchised feel that they would get to vote twice if "no mod" looked like it wasn't going to win the first time they voted???

Speaking for myself, I didn't feel disenfranchised until Rob's count illustrated why this doesn't really work. And, really, I'm still willing to go this way if Rob thinks it's best.

I guess I don't think it's fair changing things at this point. It may have made sense having just a mod or no mod vote first but at this point hypothetically some people are seeing potential results they might not care for & want a redo. That's not fair to everyone else.

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
]as far as i understand rob... see, you already voted. your "no mod" vote counts as a single vote. just as those who voted for mods is a single vote containing three specific people. yadda yadda.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods.

No.

A "single vote" for "no mods" is just that. One vote. "No Mod" gets one vote and only one, from that voter. That voter gets one vote.

In contrast, a "single vote" for a slate of mods (for example: Uschi, Sneaky, Doc) results in three votes from a voter: One for Uschi, one for Sneaky, one for Doc. Each of which goes towards that person's total number of votes.

You can't go back and vote for Gore because you figured out that Nader was losing. It's like those questions you'd see on tests or applications. "Did you go to college? (If yes, then where.)"

Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.

Of course you care. We all care. Otherwise, (a) we wouldn't vote; (b) you wouldn't have run.

(a) I haven't voted. (b) I haven't run.

Thanks for playing.

Quote:

Pariah said:
Quote:

thedoctor said:
If you vote 'no mod', it's a single vote for no mod. If you vote for up to three mods, that's a single vote for mods. I really don't care how this election comes out. Notice that I have not once said anything about my nomination one way or the other. I'll go with the flow on this. I don't really give a damn.

He's rather anxious in making sure we know he doesn't care.

Seems li'l disingenuious.

G-man made a comment that I should care. I let him know I didn't. It's called the flow of conversation. Figure it out.

Don't worry Doc. He's just sad that he's not riding on the wave of my vaginal popularity. Vagina.

Honestly, I think Bobo should just make you and Sneaks mods now and forget the other shit. You yourself have more votes than 'no mod', which is why I don't understand all the bitching.

well, because if you multiply the "No Mod" votes by Three, you get a bigger number than 13 or... whatever Shan has.

John Byrne!

Quote:

Nowhereman said:
John Byrne!

Wouldn't that be the same as having g-man as a mod again?

John Byrne!

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
i can't believe uschi received 1,111,111,111,111 votes!

Actually, she received 1111111111111 votes. That comes out to 8,191 (or 1FFF in hexadecimal), and just one shy of 10000000000000.

yer point?

My point is that there are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary and those that don't.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
G-man made a comment that I should care. I let him know I didn't. It's called the flow of conversation. Figure it out.

If you don't care then why show an affinity for caring through flow of conversation?

Quote:

Captain Sammitch said:
My point is that there are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary and those that don't.

binary...you kids and yer crazy fetishes.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
(a) I haven't voted. (b) I haven't run.

Thanks for playing.

Wait a minute here! If you weren't running then why didn't you tell people that you weren't interested?

Quote:

Wednesday said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:

rob's right, i don't see how this could unclear.

if those who wanted no mods wanted to vote for mods they wouldn't of voted for no mods.

That's easy for you to say. You're in second place. You're getting what you want.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
me
pariah
uschi

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
pariah - 111
Uschi - 1111111111111
Sneaky - 1111111111
[/LIST]

no i'm not.

Quote:

Now I'll argue for what I want. G-man's right, there should have been two elections. One for whether or not there would be mods, and one for who those mods should be (in that order for obvious reasons). Principally, those are two separate issues--the existence of mods and who, if any, those mods should be. It's akin to asking us how many AND who on the same ballot. In fact, that's exactly what it is. So, yeah, I'm not even concerned about how much one should weigh in comparison to another, per se, cuz it's apples and oranges.

But whatever. Seems the majority DO want mods (though I wonder if that would have been the case had the question been asked the way G-man proposed). Still, I've believed from the start that this should be Rob's decision. His boards, his rules. If this is the way he wants it, cool. I've added my two other votes already. I just hope they'll be considered, since I obviously didn't know the rules beforehand.

if this is such an issue for you and the others and you weren't clear on the concept of the process maybe you should of made that clear before voting began or you casted your vote. not after when things aren't "going your way".

Quote:

Uschi said:
This is technically what you all want, just all rolled into one. You vote for mod or no mod and if you want a mod you also vote for the choices available. Nobody said you COULDN'T say
Quote:

I vote no mod. in the case that this fails, here are the mods I would prefer.

so do it and let Rob decide. Like Wednesday did a page and a half ago that got totally jumped over in the conversation until just a post or two ago.

actually, if you read rob's first post in this thread the "or a requst for 'no mod'" would leave one to assume that its one or the other.

Quote:

Besides, it is just a message board moderator for one forum. Since G-Man's not in the running I really don't think there's anything to fear of someone going overboard. I, for one, am proposing a light moderating example with a minimum of effort. I have a goddamn life, you know? And it isn't like a moderator has SO MUCH POWER! Christ, they won't bomb the UN. This isn't an earth-shattering vote. This is like voting for the kind of pizza you and your friends are going to buy.

Quote:

Captain Sammitch said:
My point is that there are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary and those that don't.

That used to be my sig.

Quote:

thedoctor said:
(a) I haven't voted. (b) I haven't run.

But you obviously care enough to serve if elected.

And, if you don't intend to serve, shouldn't the people voting for you be made aware of that fact?

Quote:

thedoctor said:
Honestly, I think Bobo should just make you and Sneaks mods now and forget the other shit. You yourself have more votes than 'no mod'...

I actually already made that point and was told by Rob that that suggestion didn't make sense... which prompted my analysis of the flaws in the process.

John Byrne!

thedoctor
uschi
r3x29yz4a

Sorry thedoctor.

tk sez he wants to vote for me. He also sez he wants to see me nekkid.

is he saying that witha mouthfull of tubby custard?

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
is he saying that witha mouthfull of tubby custard?

Sneaky...that's jsut mean. They're not fat...it's you whos annorexic. Stick to the facts!

Quote:

klinton said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
is he saying that witha mouthfull of tubby custard?

Sneaky...that's jsut mean. They're not fat...it's you whos annorexic. Stick to the facts!

in some countries being able to see your spleen is considered attractive.

WHAT country?

None I wanna live in.

sorry, i know of none for fatty yellow oversized liver fetishes.

That doesn't even make any sense!

You are talking to Sneaky, please try to remember that!

no mod
rob is gay

John Byrne!

no rob
mod is gay

Uschi For Admin!

I am John Byrne.

Ooooh! Voting's almost over! I'm quivering with anticipation!

actually it was over 48 minutes before you made that post.

But on rob time its still a couple weeks away.

that doesn't make any sense.

FEMA will get us mods before rob gets around to anything.

you guys have to wait, like... 10 hours before "this is taking too long" whines spew forth. cuz, at this rate, this is super whining, which is approached by only the legendary posters.

excuse me? how is FEMA humour whining? if i were to whine i'd call your mother kamphausen.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
you guys have to wait, like... 10 hours before "this is taking too long" whines spew forth. cuz, at this rate, this is super whining, which is approached by only the legendary posters.

I thought we were legendary posters?

so, basically, after weeding through the most recent 4+ pages of debate as to whether or not the public message board vote for moderators in 1 forum was fair or not... only 2 or 3 more people have voted sine my last update; bsams and sweden (and sorta wednesday). i'll go back to double check tomorrow, when i wanna waste time at work (or, in the meantime, feel free to point out how i counted wrong and provide correct tallies)

here's the list of those who have voted:

r3x29yz4a, pjp, ttt, mxy, dogbert, pro, klint, beardguy, chant, pariah, gman, rex, glacier, mem, sneaky, scooter, bw7, lothar, snarf, capn, uschi, jaburg, jla, wbam, allan1, wednesday, bsams, sweden

and if the count is correct, here's the final:

as it stands, 14 individuals asked to be lead by uschi and 10 supported sneaky. 8 posters requested no moderator... unless of course "no mod" receives the semi-popular super enhancement, in which case it dominated with 700 votes.

r3x and doc tied it up for third with 7 votes a piece.

to make nicey nice, i'll let the 7 "no mod" voters pick either r3x or doc for the third and final spot. the 7 voters are: ttt, mxy, dogbert, beardguy, chant, gman, and bsams (wednesday was the 8th, and he already voted)

y'gots til wednesday at midnight, EST.

(and congrats to uschi and sneaky. i'll see you two in 4 months when the shit hits the fan again!)

let the whining of the "vagification of the deep throat forum" begin.

Show us your winning boobies!!

I think doc would do a better job, so I'm gonna vote for r3x.

But Ray will only be a mod for three weeks before Rob takes away his mod status!

I'm voting for doc because he says he doesn't care. Which means he does.

Someone's still bitter.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
so, basically, after weeding through the most recent 4+ pages of debate as to whether or not the public message board vote for moderators in 1 forum was fair or not... only 2 or 3 more people have voted sine my last update; bsams and sweden (and sorta wednesday). i'll go back to double check tomorrow, when i wanna waste time at work (or, in the meantime, feel free to point out how i counted wrong and provide correct tallies)

here's the list of those who have voted:
r3x29yz4a, pjp, ttt, mxy, dogbert, pro, klint, beardguy, chant, pariah, gman, rex, glacier, mem, sneaky, scooter, bw7, lothar, snarf, capn, uschi, jaburg, jla, wbam, allan1, wednesday, bsams, sweden

and if the count is correct, here's the final:
Uschi - 11111111111111 (14)
Sneaky - 1111111111 (10)
no moderator - 11111111 (8)
Thedoctor - 1111111 (7)
r3x29yz4a - 1111111 (7)
son of mxy - 11111 (5)
WBAM - 1111 (4)
misterjla - 111 (3)
pariah - 111 (3)
PJP - 111 (3)
MEM - 1 (1)
Mxy - 1 (1)

as it stands, 14 individuals asked to be lead by uschi and 10 supported sneaky. 8 posters requested no moderator... unless of course "no mod" receives the semi-popular super enhancement, in which case it dominated with 700 votes.

r3x and doc tied it up for third with 7 votes a piece.

to make nicey nice, i'll let the 7 "no mod" voters pick either r3x or doc for the third and final spot. the 7 voters are: ttt, mxy, dogbert, beardguy, chant, gman, and bsams (wednesday was the 8th, and he already voted)

y'gots til wednesday at midnight, EST.

(and congrats to uschi and sneaky. i'll see you two in 4 months when the shit hits the fan again!)

John Byrne!

Quote:

thedoctor said:
But Ray will only be a mod for three weeks before Rob takes away his mod status!

Quote:

thedoctor said:
Someone's still bitter.

clearly!

I like to take this moment to renew my request that instead of using the term "Moderator" we use the term "Kick Ass Knights of Order".

Thank you for your consideration.

Ummm...actually, I second that.

John Byrne!

WooHoo!

howcome backwards7's didn't count?

thedoctor

Quote:

Uschi said:
WooHoo!

howcome backwards7's didn't count?

it did, he voted for you dipshit.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
Quote:

Uschi said:
WooHoo!

howcome backwards7's didn't count?

it did, he voted for you dipshit.

whoohoo, now that's moderation!

I vote for The Doctor.

Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
I vote for r3x29yz4a.

uh oh, this vote seems to be mixed up. rob will have to void it, or maybe he should just give the vote to the candidate by alphabetical order.

that wont work, r3x would be before thedoc

then let dsk pune and i decide.

I'm with Iron Man.

But I vote for Uschi.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
Quote:

Uschi said:
WooHoo!

howcome backwards7's didn't count?

it did, he voted for you dipshit.

No, silly, I know he voted for me. It's just that in this:

Quote:

here's the list of those who have voted:

r3x29yz4a, pjp, ttt, mxy, dogbert, pro, klint, beardguy, chant, pariah, gman, rex, glacier, mem, sneaky, scooter, bw7, lothar, snarf, capn, uschi, jaburg, jla, wbam, allan1, wednesday, bsams, sweden

I didn't initially (or over the second and third scan) see bw7 - or at least I didn't mentally process it as backwards7.

I'd put my foot in my mouth except it's damn filthy after stepping in G-Man's dilluded ego on my way to the Throne of Power.

Quote:

TK-069 said:
I'm with Iron Man.

But I vote for Uschi.

the vote for me ended Sunday.

that means you won, tk!

I vote for TTT.

Typical Canadian. Always betting on the losing horse.

Leave it to a Canadian to bring a knife to a gun fight.

Jealous?

I woulda pegged most canucks to bring an axe or a chain saw to a gun fight. Lumberjacks, and stuff...

Okay, more likely a hockey stick.

as of right now...

r3x has 1 vote (mxy) and doc has 3 (dogbert, beardguy, gman)

chant, bsams, and ttt still have to vote -- 1 more "doc" nod gives him the win.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
as of right now...

r3x has 1 vote (mxy) and doc has 3 (dogbert, beardguy, gman)

chant, bsams, and ttt still have to vote -- 1 more "doc" nod gives him the win.

Sonofr3x29yz4a and Imnotr3x29yz4a also voted for me.
Their vote should count.

I vote doc.

Sorry ray, but... well, hell, who am I kidding?

I vote r3x29yz4a

justa few hours left for final campaigning. if the votes go unchanged by midnight, doc will assume the third moderator spot.

r3x remember that chant, bsams, and ttt can be bought!

I've just been bought... by cheap flattery!

My vote goes to r3x... however you spell his name.

r3x now has 2 votes (mxy and ttt)
doc still has 3 votes (dogbert, beardguy, gman)

chant and bsams are still up for (sexual) grabs for the next 5 hours

Dogbert, BTW, can be bribed with certain volumes of the DC Archives, or the cash equivalent (retail value).

Dogbert...while drinking before posting is highly encouraged...smoking heaps of cheap crack is not.

Quote:

Captain Sammitch said:
I vote doc.

Sorry ray, but... well, hell, who am I kidding?

or a tug boat.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
Quote:

Captain Sammitch said:
I vote doc.

Sorry ray, but... well, hell, who am I kidding?

or a tug boat.

See...drinking is approved of...

also, tug boats

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
r3x now has 2 votes (mxy and ttt)
doc still has 3 votes (dogbert, beardguy, gman)

chant and bsams are still up for (sexual) grabs for the next 5 hours

g-man's vote should be voided. he has a serious conflict of interest seeing as how he is my arch-nemesis and i split his forum and then caused his depowering.

r3x

Assuming I want to, is it possible to change my vote?

just think only months ago you could have changed yours and everyone else's!

Quote:

Pariah said:
I vote r3x29yz4a

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
i'm gonna milk this controversy for all its worth, cuz i likes the cheap heat!

It doesn't matter who you vote for; we're all Chewy Walrus alts.

too late to vote, fellas?
i vote for r3x29yz4a

this is just sad.

But amusing.

This election is like a soap opera... it just keeps going on and on and on......

Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
This election is like a soap opera... it just keeps going on and on and on......

Ok, I'll say it.
I think G-man is the real "Mr. X" and I think that BSAMS "accident" was no accident.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
i'm gonna milk this controversy for all its worth, cuz i likes the cheap heat!

Quote:

MisterJLA said:
I can't believe I lost my gimmick

You know what, if I can change my vote, I'm changing it.

I vote Ray.

This - is the election that would not die!

thedoctor

Chant

Chant, you can't vote twice.

i vote for uschi's special needs kitty.

I also vote for uschi's pussy.

chant's after-hours voting have given doc the win

atypical europwn4g3 ftw!!1!

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
chant's after-hours voting have given doc the win

bullshit.
g-man changed his vote and you can't accept a vote days after the fact.

g-man changed his vote after the voting ended.

chant was the only one of the 7 who didn't vote yet, so when it ended in a tie, he became the tie-breaker.

Quote:

Rob Kamphausen said:
g-man changed his vote after the voting ended.

chant was the only one of the 7 who didn't vote yet, so when it ended in a tie, he became the tie-breaker.

i was in talks with g-man and he agreed to change his vote before the voting ended. and he told me he had messaged you saying as much before the voting ended.
chant waited days to vote, days after your own imposed deadline. regardless of when g-man posted his change here, he told you before the deadline.
and even if you do just count his change as late, if you want to count chant's late vote then you have to consider all late voting.

Point of information, Ray. Actually I didn't message Rob. I posted the question here in the thread as to whether I could change my vote.

I never got a response, but then tried to change my vote anyway. I thought I did so before the voting ended.

But anyway...at one point there was talk, I think by you, Rob, that more forums would be subject to new elections.

Is that so?

Quote:

the G-man said:
Point of information, Ray. Actually I didn't message Rob. I posted the question here in the thread as to whether I could change my vote.

I never got a response, but then tried to change my vote anyway. I thought I did so before the voting ended.

But anyway...at one point there was talk, I think by you, Rob, that more forums would be subject to new elections.

Is that so?

well as i said even if you hadn't pmd rob that night, if rob counts chant's late vote then he has to count your late (though earlier than chant's) change of vote.

In case nobody noticed, Rob can and does do whatever he wants, hence his title GOB.

Quote:

Uschi said:
In case nobody noticed, Rob can and does do whatever he wants, hence his title GOB.

true. but it'd be nice if he didn't hide his decision behind a vote. kind of wimpy.

Quote:

the G-man said:
But anyway...at one point there was talk, I think by you, Rob, that more forums would be subject to new elections.

Is that so?

I would think that only be fair...

That Prometheus guy doesn't do crap
too busy being balls deep in stuff.

I think every forum should have three mods and that the people should decide who should fill those positions.

Yeah.

Quote:

Wednesday said:
I think every forum should have three mods and that the people should decide who should fill those positions.

Yeah.

i think every forum should have over 300 mods.

Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
That Prometheus guy doesn't do crap
too busy being balls deep in stuff.

No one will send me any answers to my interviews...

Quote:

Prometheus said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
That Prometheus guy doesn't do crap
too busy being balls deep in stuff.

No one will send me any answers to my interviews...

not my problem, i told you who i thought should be interviewed and you said no.

Quote:

Prometheus said:
Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
That Prometheus guy doesn't do crap
too busy being balls deep in stuff.

No one will send me any answers to my interviews...

You never asked! You just said "you're coming up on my list" and that was it!

Oh, I'm for 2 mods to a forum, 3 sounds like too many.

Quote:

Uschi said:
In case nobody noticed, Rob can and does do whatever he wants, hence his title GOB.

comin t'getcha, poland!

Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
well as i said even if you hadn't pmd rob that night, if rob counts chant's late vote then he has to count your late (though earlier than chant's) change of vote.

chant's late vote only counts because the regularly-timed votes ended in a tie, and he was the only vote not yet registered. and i did not switch john "g-man" kerry's vote.

Quote:

the G-man said:
at one point there was talk, I think by you, Rob, that more forums would be subject to new elections.

Is that so?

aye.

next up is the religion / deep thoughts forum. r3x can complain in there!