You're the one using a memo written by the head of a thirty-person group as the smoking gun to "prove" that there is some sort of big conspiracy at play.

If you're going to use something as your evidence, you can't whine when people point out how weak the proof is.

At the same time you're also ignoring the evidence of big labor* inciting the violence and preventing legitimate protests from occurring.


*(and we all know that big labor has a documented history of organized violence and political intimidation)