Originally Posted By: The Dread Pirate Westley
 Originally Posted By: britneyspearsatemyshorts
give me proof that he's not.


It is for the positive position to prove their point. If it were not so, groundless, ridiculous claims would have to be taken as fact just on the basis that one cannot always disprove the impossible to observe.

IE: Should you say that pluto is composed of Rocky Road icecream, it is your burden to prove it so, and not my burden to fly to pluto and prove it false.



your the science guy, you believe in plenty of uproven things like global warming,the age of the earth for examples.


but back to the issue at hand, dont go asking me to prove something that you cannot disprove. it's weak sauce.