RKMBs
Posted By: Wonder Boy JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-29 7:37 AM




http://twomorrows.com/images/large/books/cjkc1-2_LRG.jpg
http://www.twomorrows.com/




It occurred to me earlier that today is Jack Kirby's birthday (I wanted to start this topic earlier, his birthday is actually August 28, 1917, so this topic is starting a little after-the-fact).

Jack Kirby is largely the reason I began collecting, and have continued to enjoy comics for over 3 decades, since I began reading in 1971.

Before my Kirby phase, I began with Harvey comics' humor titles for about a year, before I discovered superhero titles in 1972.
And I think Kirby-wise, it was a great time to begin reading DC and Marvel titles. I began reading DC titles with BATMAN 241, and was soon also reading DETECTIVE, JUSTICE LEAGUE, WORLD'S FINEST and SUPERMAN, HOUSE OF MYSTERY and a few others.

I was reading these for several months when a few new titles came along that really got my attention.
First was THE DEMON # 1 (cover date August/September 1972), and I was just knocked out by the pages in that, although at age 9 or so I didn't really think about art. Because Kirby's name was on the cover as well as the story credits, I think Kirby's stories were the first comics I thought of as someone's personal work.





( larger/clearer image at: )
http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/23727666690.1.GIF




( larger/clearer image at: )
http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/23727666690.2.GIF



A month or two after, KAMANDI # 1 (cover date November 1972) came along, and this pretty much sealed my desire to look at anything from this point forward that Kirby produced. I was hooked !




( larger/clearer image at: )
http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/45357796056.1.GIF



( larger/clearer image at: )
http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/45357796056.2.GIF

KAMANDI was, and remains, my favorite comic series of everything I've read. The endless stream of adventure and visual wonders, the sincerity and nobility of Kamandi, Ben Boxer, Dr Canus, Tuftan, Flower and other characters, against the backdrop of an untamed and chaotic world, our world through a mirror darkly, all collectively make it the quintessence of what comics are about for me: Pure fun, pure adventure, stunning visuals, and heroes of nobility and conscience.
Writers who arguably have more literary talent have failed to grasp the storytelling essentials that Kirby clearly did, in KAMANDI, and in so many of his other works.



Around the same time KAMANDI began (late 1972), Kirby's work also appeared in WEIRD MYSTERY TALES issues 1-3, and FORBIDDEN TALES OF DARK MANSION 6 ( a set of stories that were sold to DC, because the black-and-white SPIRIT WORLD magazine was cancelled after the first issue. Which I found out much later would have been SPIRIT WORLD # 2. But in any case, they look much better in color than if they'd been published in black-and-white magazine form).

And in this same few months, I first began reading MARVEL'S GREATEST COMICS, starting with issue 38, reprinting the classic Lee/Kirby FF run (issue 38 reprints FF 51, "This Man, This Monster", which I think is the best issue of the series, a great issue to start reading the Lee/Kirby FF run).

But at this point I was more partial to Kirby's DC work. I found Stan Lee's "ever-lovin" editorial insertions into the narrative a bit intrusive and annoying. But I still enjoyed the stories, I just liked Kirby's DC work more. I later developed an acquired taste for Stan Lee, but it took time.

I also had the good fortune to be given Jules Feiffer's THE GREAT COMIC BOOK heroes as a gift one Christmas (1973) and, among many other classics, first read Kirby's 1941 origin of Captain America.
Although the name Jack Kirby was the same as in the 70's titles I was reading, the style was very different, and I don't know if I immediately connected these two eras with the same artist.
It was not until I was older and collected Kirby's Fourth World books (with backup 1940's reprints of Newsboy Legion, Manhunter, Sandman, and Boy Commandos) that I fully appreciated that this was an artist whose work spans the entire history of comic books.

Also unknown to me at the time I first read them, some of the stories reprinted in the 1971-1972 issues of HOUSE OF MYSTERY and HOUSE OF SECRETS also reprint late 1950's Kirby work for DC.
As do the 1973-1974 reprint series BLACK MAGIC (reprinting 1950-1954 Simon & Kirby work) and BOY COMMANDOS (reprinting Simon and Kirby's 1942-1943 work).

Meanwhile, I was still loving the DEMON and KAMANDI.

Later came OMAC, SANDMAN, OUR FIGHTING FORCES and FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL (featuring single issue tryouts of ATLAS, MANHUNTER and DINGBATS), JUSTICE INC., KOBRA, and RICHARD DRAGON KUNG-FU FIGHTER.
Kirby's leaving DC in late 1975 was a great disappointment to me.

But his return to Marvel in 1976 got me excited again, especially THE ETERNALS.



( larger/clearer image at: )
http://www.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/29921775528.1.GIF

As well as Kirby's fun work in CAPTAIN AMERICA, 2001, MACHINE MAN, BLACK PANTHER and DEVIL DINOSAUR ( all in the 1976-1978 era).

It was only after Kirby left DC in 1975, and then left comics entirely in 1978 (to pursue animation on a Fantastic Four cartoon series, among others) that I really began to discover a lot more artists and storytelling styles in comics.
I think the Shooter era at Marvel from 1978-1987 was one of Marvel's most creative periods. So if Kirby had to leave comics, at least it was at a time when a lot of other talented newcomers came in to do their best work.

In 1979 I also turned 16, and with purchase of my first car, I sought out comic shops and started filling in back issues I'd missed.

I first filled out the gaps in my KAMANDI collection, and worked my way back to Kirby's Fourth World books (FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MR MIRACLE and JIMMY OLSEN) and fell in love with Kirby's work all over again. I still think the Fourth World books stand out as Kirby's best and most ambitious work. I still pull these out once a year or so and re-read them.
But my favorite Kirby work remains KAMANDI. Pure adventure, and lots of fun to read.

Once I completed my 70's Kirby collection, I moved on to filling in my Neal Adams BATMAN and DETECTIVE issues, along with the other O'Neil, Novick and Giordano issues. And then moved on to more Adams, Wrightson, Kaluta, and DC's mystery books.

But I never shook the Kirby fever.

Kirby also came back in late 1981 to help launch the Pacific Comics line, and as writer/artist, created the first alternative-publisher color comic of the 1980's, CAPTAIN VICTORY. Which was a major step to broadening the market, and establishing royalties and creator ownership of characters.
While I have to agree it's not Kirby's best, CAPTAIN VICTORY came out at a time (I was 18 at the time) that allowed me to re-visit the wonder I felt in the early and mid-70's with Kirby's many great previous works for Marvel and DC. And Royer was back to ink it, with glorious Steve Oliff colors.


I acquired enough of a taste for Stan Lee that I finally purchased a near-complete run of Lee/Kirby FF issues, a complete run of FF 28-102, and scattered issues before that back to issue 13, and reprints of the rest, which I managed to put together between 1982-1983. Which was perfect timing with Byrne's run on FF 232-293, which is Byrne's wonderful tribute to the original Lee/Kirby run.

In 1984-1985, I put together a run of the Lee/Kirby JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR series (issues 102-177 and 179). I initially resisted this run because I didn't like Vince Colletta's inks on other titles in Colletta's 70's and 80's work, but as I explored these 1960's THOR issues, I was amazed at his inks on Kirby's J.I.M./THOR. And also his inks in FF 40-43.

I got a good sampling of Kirby's pre-Marvel monster stories back in the early/mid 1970's, in 70's reprint books like CREATURES ON THE LOOSE, FEAR, MONSTERS ON THE PROWL, WHERE CREATURES ROAM and WHERE MONSTERS DWELL.

And for the last two years or so, I've been most into the 1959-1963 pre-Marvel monster stories again, that ran in JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY 59-82, STRANGE TALES 67-100, TALES OF SUSPENSE 1-35, TALES TO ASTONISH 1-35 (before superheroes took over these books), and also in the shorter runs of AMAZING ADVENTURES/AMAZING ADULT FANTASY, as well as shorter runs of STRANGE WORLDS, and WORLD OF FANTASY.

It's wonderful to see these books, and how they evolved into Marvel's budding superhero age.
The best article I've seen on the pre-Marvel period from 1949-1962 is in the Overstreet Guide 22nd edition (1992 edition).







Another article that begins with the 1963-forward Marvel Age, "The Four Phases of Marvel" can be seen online here:
(just look for the "Four Phases of Marvel" button, on the left-border list)
http://www.samcci.comics.org/reviews/






Jack Kirby is the reason many of us began collecting, and also the reason many of the current comics field professionals were inspired to become artists as well.








Here's a website that allows you to look at the many covers Kirby did for Marvel in the 1958-1970 period:
(You can just click on the top two for FF and JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, and from those links can title-search for Kirby's other covers on AMAZING ADVENTURES, AMAZING FANTASY, STRANGE TALES, TALES OF SUSPENSE, TALES TO ASTONISH, THOR, STRANGE WORLDS, WORLD OF FANTASY, RAWHIDE KID, TWO-GUN KID, BATTLE, LOVE ROMANCES, X-MEN and many other covers you'd like to view.)
FANTASTIC FOUR
JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY(THOR)

Plus, as most of you are no doubt familiar with, many other articles and publications about Kirby and interviews of those who worked with him can be found at:
www.twomorrows.com




Which, longwinded as it is, is just the tip of the iceberg regarding my affection for Kirby's work. And for many others here, I'm sure.




Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:41 AM
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...

There's a general-comics section over there, and near as I can tell so far, a more level-headed crowd...
Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:41 AM
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...
Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:41 AM
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...
Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:41 AM
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...
Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:53 AM
Just thought I'd mention this, as I'm currently in the middle of re-reading my Kirby comics-- for the first time ever-- in CHRONOLOGICAL sequence!!!

I started out with the first 2 volumes of Greg Theaskston's THE COMPLETE JACK KIRBY. then, after putting together a chronological listing of all the stories I have (and where all the reprints are located) I plowed thru ever Golden Age Marvel Comic story in my entire collection! 22 Bill Everett SUB-MARINER stories-- wow!! A bunch of Carl Burgos HUMAN TORCH stories-- what CRAP!! A mess of other, miscellaneous stuff-- and of course-- the first 10 issues of CAPTAIN AMERICA. Whoa!!!!! I have the strongest feeling Jim Steranko has a copy of CA #10, because 2 or 3 of the stories in there he --ahem-- "borrowed" heavily from for work he did in the late 60's!

Then I moved on to Kirby's DC work. For this, I had to update my DC index, so I could re-read all those Fourth World back-up reprints in the CORRECT order. Which was cool-- especially when I got to the BOY COMMANDOS story where they teamed up with THE SANDMAN & SANDY THE GOLDEN BOY and THE NEWSBOY LEGION & THE GUARDIAN, as well as the Kid Commandos, AND get to meet F.D.R.!!! Whatta story!!!

Next up was STUNTMAN (Greg Theakston, 1987); THE COMPLETE JACK KIRBY (Mar-May 1947 and Jun-Aug 1947) with CLUE COMICS (with Gunmaster), HEADLINE COMICS, PUNCH & JUDY (with Lockjaw The Alligator), AIRBOY COMICS (with Link Thorne the Flying Fool); YOUNG ROMANCE #1 (DC, 2000), REAL LOVE (Young Romance & Young Love, from Eclipse, 1988), 3-D MAN (AC Comics / Golden Age Men Of Mystery #15, 1999); and right now I'm in the middle of FIGHTING AMERICAN!!! (Marvel, 1989)

The very recent HULK, CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN, HUMAN TORCH and JIMMY OLSEN books are really coming at a good time. The JO book, incidentally, FINALLY filled in the one last episode of the Fourth World epic I'd never read before (the 2nd episode)--so at last, I have the WHOLE THING!!!

But I'm really dying to get to the 1960's. Early Marvel-- especially FANTASTIC FOUR-- is my favorite period of comics. With those, after finally filling in so many gaps after decades, I'm ready to tackle the monumental task of re-reading every 1960's Marvel story in my collection-- in chronological order! YEEH-HAH!
Posted By: profh0011 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-08-31 5:57 AM
That's is so weird... no way I posted that thing 4 times!!!
Yeah, lots of weird things have been happening... Like, I tried to register in the Legion boards (since that's where the level-headed crowd is at) and my e-mail was banned! Isn't that special?
quote:
Originally posted by profh0011:
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...

On the other hand, Davem you might wanna come over to

http://www.legionworld.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi

There's a general-comics section over there, and near as I can tell so far, a more level-headed crowd...

Look, I'm the message board pimp around here, ok? Sod off and get your own stretch of street.
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-09-08 4:07 PM
quote:
Originally posted by I'm Not Mister Mxypltk:
Yeah, lots of weird things have been happening... Like, I tried to register in the Legion boards (since that's where the level-headed crowd is at) and my e-mail was banned! Isn't that special?

Lucky I have multiple email addys,although the name Nowhereman was not allowed!
Posted By: theory9 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-09-08 4:18 PM
quote:
Originally posted by profh0011:
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...

On the other hand, Davem you might wanna come over to

http://www.legionworld.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi

There's a general-comics section over there, and near as I can tell so far, a more level-headed crowd...

...bunch of fuckin' hosers over there. Keep your crap porn to yourself!
quote:
Originally posted by profh0011:
Man, Rob's Boards have really hit bottom of late. This is the first time I've even looked in for 2 whole weeks. there just hasn't been ANYTHING of interest being discussed here at all...

On the other hand, Davem you might wanna come over to

http://www.legionworld.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi

There's a general-comics section over there, and near as I can tell so far, a more level-headed crowd...

I'd like to know what this has to do with the Wonder Boy's post.
Posted By: theory9 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-09-09 4:01 PM
Hear hear!
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-11-08 4:48 AM
This is actually probably the best time ever to collect Kirby. Much of his work prior to the 1960's wasn't very accessible, until the last decade, due to how few copies there are out there, from the 1965-and-prior comics era.

But as Profh0011 pointed out, much of Kirby's early work is now being reprinted, and extensive checklists of Kirby's work are also making it easier to seek out Kirby's massive body of work.

I highly recommend THE ART OF JACK KIRBY (by Ray Wyman and Catherine Hohlfeld, 1992, The Blue Rose Press). Which in addition to covering Kirby's entire career, has an extremely detailed checklist and chronology of Kirby's work. A tremendously useful reference tool.

Two other great volumes are the collected hardcovers of BOYS RANCH and FIGHTING AMERICAN.

And of course, the Marvel Masterworks collections of virtually all Kirby's early Marvel work on FANTASTIC FOUR, THOR, AVENGERS, and X-MEN.

All in beautifully reprinted hardcover editions, that make them arguably more enjoyable than when they were published decades ago.

If only DC would release Kirby's Fourth World books in nice hardcovers, then all his best work would be available in nice editions.

Although DC did just release Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN material in a new trade (JIMMY OLSEN issues 133-139,141). With hopefully a concluding volume of 142-148 to follow.
Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN is among my favorites of Kirby's work, it's tremendously fun reading. A great mix of action and humor. Too bad the Transilvane story (JO, issues 142-143) couldn't be reprinted for Halloween. Maybe the 2nd volume will be out before next Halloween.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2003-12-14 4:52 AM
I saw these on e-bay, and thought you'd get a kick out of seeing them.

A set of 14 poster-size prints of ornate Kirby designs of architecture and movie set designs.

Kirby in 1978- 1979 apparently did set designs for a Science Fiction theme park, and also for a movie based on Roger Zelazny's work. Here's the link:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2210171508&category=972
 Quote:

JACK KIRBY full set LORD OF LIGHT, 14 drawings

RARE Jack Kirby art prints! Starting at a low bidding price of only $500 ($850 retail) we are presenting #14 of the complete individually numbered sets of Jack Kirby's legendary, unpublished artwork commissioned for the feature film of Roger Zelazny's "Lord of Light" and the 100 acre "Science Fiction Land" theme park, during 1978 and 1979. Each set has 13 prints sized 20"X24" and one HUGE 40"x24"PRINT. Many consider it to be Jack Kirby's most exclusive examples of his personal architectural vision, with a stature never seen before. The Lord of Light art was inked by Mr.Mike Royer.That's 14 Total Prints! Click below for larger images and personal history of how Jack created each drawing.


Some VERY cool pages of oversize art !

Two of the images:

"Science Fiction Land"




"Pavilions of Joy"

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-10 2:12 AM
I Started reading comics around 1963, as
soon as I learned to read.. Before then, I
was only able to look at the pictures!

I was aware of Jack Kirby's artwork INSTANTY.
He was a great artist: His figures, machinery
and backgrounds were all drawn quite well!

I started reading the Fantastic Four around
issue 19 or so... Wow!!!!!!! Jack made an
impression on me!!

I'm an artist, too..though my forte is portraits
and landscapes, I did draw superheroes. I'm not
one hundreth as good as Jack ( Or my OTHER
artistic idol, Curt Swan, who as you know drew
Superman for many years!! )

Jack was excellent at portaying emotions on his
characters, and drawing anything from a Battle scene
to just having his characters discussing plans.

I was sad to hear of his death.
That was several years ago now.
I wish I'd have met him. I've heard
he was a very nice man.

He left a fine legacy..Many years of
excellent art and story telling.

And many years of inspiration, to large
numbers of comic book readers, young and
not so young.

Thank you , Jack. You were one of the
great ones.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-12 11:58 PM


In a way I envy you, Beardguy, to be just a few years older than me, and to have seen the Silver Age unfold before you as it happened from 1963 forward, in the "wonder years" of your pre-pubescence.

Beginning with "The Flash of Two Worlds" (FLASH 123, September 1961, the first Golden Age and Silver Age Flash crossover), and "Crisis on Earth One/Earth Two" (the first JLA/JSA crossover in JLA 21 and 22, August and September 1963, which began an annual event in that series) and the beginning of the "DC Universe" developing from that time as well.
Another great early crossover is in MYSTERY IN SPACE 90 (March 1964) "Planets in Peril" by Fox and Infantino, teaming Adam Strange, Hawkman and the JLA, a fun story that was one more step toward an increasingly cohesive DC universe of characters.
Another (recently collected in a trade paperback, titled ZATANNA'S SEARCH) is a loosely connected set of crossover stories, done over several years, from JLA, HAWKMAN, DETECTIVE COMICS, GREEN LANTERN and THE ATOM, from 1963 to 1966 or so.

While over at Marvel, their superhero age began with FANTASTIC FOUR # 1 in November 1961. And then gradually, the Hulk, Spiderman and Thor were slowly launched in 1962.
The Hulk made his first crossover guest appearance in FF # 12, in March 1963.
There was also an Spider-man/FF crossover in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL # 1 (Sept 1963), where Spiderman visits the Baxter Building, and tries to join the FF.
And shortly after, AVENGERS 1 and X-MEN 1 were released in September 1963.
The first crossovers between the Avengers, FF, and X-Men began in 1964, with guest appearances by the Avengers in FF 25-26, and the X-men in a crossover appearance in FF 28.
The absolute best crossover ever was in AMAZING SPIDERMAN ANNUAL # 1 (1964), by Lee and Ditko, where every last Marvel hero made a guest appearance. Great story !

And from there things progressed, with introduction and expansion of a number of other characters, such as The Watcher, The Recorder, Galactus, the Silver Surfer, The Inhumans, Black Panther, and other characters who made the Marvel tapestry increasingly more cohesive, from 1963-1966.

DC's climb toward the Silver Age plateau had begun earlier with introduction of the new Silver Age Flash in 1956, and with the slow introduction over a period of years of Adam Strange(MYSTERY IN SPACE), and new Silver Age versions of GREEN LANTERN, THE ATOM, JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA, HAWKMAN and others, that all made a gradual crawl from scattered appearances in SHOWCASE and BRAVE AND THE BOLD, and over a period of years (1958-1964) slowly eased into their own regular series.
Very slowly.
And it was not until JLA 21 and 22 (the first JLA/JSA crossover, in 1963) that things began to really evolve on the DC side as well.











It must have been really exciting to watch things unfold at both DC and Marvel on a monthly basis throughout this era.

 Quote:
Originally posted by Beardguy57:

I wish I'd have met him. I've heard
he was a very nice man.



I had the good fortune to meet Jack Kirby in person at San Diego Con in July/August 1987.
He was in a conference room in a panel discussion with others, but it was as if the others didn't even exist, because all the questions were aimed at Jack. He was very personable. And it was funny, because he couldn't seem to remember what series he did in what order, he wasn't sure if he'd done NEW GODS or KAMANDI first.

Which is natural, because he did such a huge monthly output of work over so many decades. We're the ones who constantly re-read and index his stories, Kirby just wrote and drew them one at a time, and then moved on to create the next one, never looking back.

So it was interesting that even though he created them, it was obvious that, chronologically and analytically, we knew more about his stories than Kirby himself did.
It also made me feel like a comic geek, for knowing Kirby's continuity perhaps too well, more than the King himself did.

Although being in his 70's at the time, I'm sure Kirby's memory wasn't as sharp as it once was.

As fortune would have it, when I came in late to that conference room (a few minutes late) and took a chair up in one of the front rows that was open, I happened to pick the seat right next to Roz Kirby !!

She was very nice too, and in the mob of people who were trying to talk to Kirby during and after the panel discussion, I was actually able to talk to her much longer than Jack. I asked her to sign my 1987 San Diego Con book, and she seemed very surprised by this. She asked why I'd want her signature, and I told her "because you're Jack Kirby's wife ! You're the woman behind the man !" She blushed and signed my book. Both were extremely modest and nice, despite every one of us treating them like gods.

You can see Jack Kirby on Ken Viola's 60-minute video, THE MASTERS OF COMIC BOOK ART, produced in 1987, where Harlan Ellison hosts and gives 1-minute introductions for 10 different comic book artists, who are interviewed for about 5 minutes each. In the order they are interviewed, the artists are Will Eisner, Harvey Kurtzman, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko(who narrates, but is the only artist not seen), Neal Adams, Berni Wrightson, Moebius, Frank Miller, Dave Sim, and Art Spiegelman. A great little tape, that lets you see many of the masters of the field.
( Although I would like to have seen a second volume, featuring Joe Kubert, Al Williamson, Frank Frazetta, Carmine Infantino, Jim Steranko, Michael Kaluta, Barry Windsor-Smith, Jim Starlin, Michael Golden, and John Bolton ! )


But anyway, if you can find this video, it's a place where you can see Kirby talk about his work.
There was a book recently collecting the Comics Journal interviews of Jack Kirby, with his wife Roz speaking in the conversation as well.

( Below is a taste of that initial excitement I felt, when first seeing Kirby's Fourth World books advertised, in my own re-creation of DC's full-page house ad in JIMMY OLSEN 134, from when Kirby first left Marvel and arrived at DC in 1970: )

___________________________________________


THE MAGIC OF... KIRBY !!







__________________________________________



I first read these stories in 1979.

But through this ad in JIMMY OLSEN 134 (which issue I had the good fortune to stumble on in a used bookstore before I got the later Fourth World books, and was thus able to read them in order) I was able to experience the excitement as if I was there from the beginning:


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MNK0lQqf-vc/RvCAIL6ufJI/AAAAAAAAB6w/iLq8VuoEH5E/s1600/MagicOfKirbyAd.jpg

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-13 7:42 AM
Dave The wonder Boy :

I envy YOU! You actually met
Jack Kirby!!!

That is a memory I expect you'll cherish for
as long as you live. Roz sounds like she was a
very special woman. They were quite fortunate
to have been together for all those years.

I did meet Chris Clairmont at a Comic convention
in spring of 1983. I wanted to show him a sample
of my work. I brought a story I'd written and drawn
myself. NOT for future employment, but just for
an overall critique.

He glanced at it, then handed it back to me after
only a minute of looking at it.

" it's not up to professional Standards. ", He told me.

" I know that, " I replied.... " I just wanted you to see it
because you write the X Men and I respect you
because you do a great job! " I told him enthusiastically.

" Thanks. " he said, and walked off.

I didn't like him so much after that, though I read the
X Men for several more years, until fall of 1989. That was
when the book lost it's " One big X family " type feel and
began to take on a new direction that I had difficulty
relating to.

I'd rather have shown that multi part story ( Using heroes
of my own making. ) to Jack Kirby. Now THAT would
have been a great memory!

Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 3:44 AM
I never understood peoples fascination with Kirby,his art was shit & all his 4th world characters (with the exception of Mr.Miracle & possibly Darkseid) were crap with stupid gay names!
In my book Kirby is way over rated with guys like Ditko being far superior!
I really find it difficult to read anything pencilled by Kirby cause the art work is so damn crappy!
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 3:46 AM
Okay, Nowhere Man..So you don't like Jack Kirby.


What comic artists DO you like?
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 3:54 AM
Pretty much anyone who isnt Jack Kirby (with the exception of Byrne & Liefield)!

Fave artists off the top of my head,in no particular order:
Alan Davis
Brian Bolland
Neil Adams
Alex Ross
Dave Gibbons
George Perez
Phil Jimenez
Jim Aparo
Curt Swan
John Romita
Kevin Maguire
Tom Mandrake
Jerry Ordway
Gil Kane
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 4:13 AM
Those are a GREAT bunch of artists!

I like Ordway, Curt Swan, most of the ones you
named, and some that were Not on your list:

John Buscema

Bob McLeod

Bill Sinkewicz ( spell? )

Stuart Immomen

Don Heck

Sal Buscema

Wally Wood

To name a few.
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 4:24 AM
As I say,that was just off the top of my head.
I do like Immonens work & some but not all or Sienkiwitz (whatever)!
There is a lot of others.
One name escapes me though,there was a guy who did a humungous JLA run in the 70s/80s but I cant for the life of me remember his name!
Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 11:22 PM
Quote:

Nowhereman said:
One name escapes me though,there was a guy who did a humungous JLA run in the 70s/80s but I cant for the life of me remember his name!




Dick Dillon?

He did something like 150 issues of the original JLA, from the 60s until his death in 1980.

He had a really clean, realistic style, somewhere between Curt Swan and Neal Adams. Unfortunately, like far too many DC artists, he was often saddled with inappropriate inkers who ruined his fabulous line work.
Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-16 11:30 PM
Anyway, here's my take on Jack Kirby.

Jack Kirby is to comic book art what Elvis Presley was to rock and roll. He was the guy who pretty much invented it.

There were others before him that did similar things but didn't quite capture the magic. There were others about the same time who might have been more technically proficient. But in each case (Kirby and Elvis) they had some special, indescribable, mixture of talent, style and that "x" factor to be the artist that made everyone take notice and, therefore, pretty much invented "the language" of their genre.

Both Kirby and Elvis might have declined in their later years but that doesn't diminish their influence on everyone else.

No wonder we call both "the King."
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-17 2:10 AM
G - Man :

Well Put! That is how I feel about Jack Kirby, too!!!

Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-17 4:40 AM
Yeah,Dick Dillin thats the guy!

Gotta disagree about the comparison to Elvis!
Elvis was a great singer up to when he died (ok so live he was mostly in a drugged up stupor) and to my mind actually released some of his best records!

Kirby didnt deteriorate either,his style stayed the same so to me all his work looked nasty!
There were far superior artists from the 30's onwards who dont get half the credit Kirby does!
To my mind the only reason Kirby has been given the stature he has is due to the fact when Marvel launched in the 60's,he pencilled the bulk of the titles giving him an iconic status far beyond his actual talent!
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-18 10:02 AM



Wow, you guys have been busy since the last time I posted here !



 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:
Dave the Wonder Boy :

I envy YOU! You actually met
Jack Kirby!!!

That is a memory I expect you'll cherish for
as long as you live. Roz sounds like she was a
very special woman. They were quite fortunate
to have been together for all those years.

I did meet Chris Claremont at a Comic convention
in spring of 1983. I wanted to show him a sample
of my work. I brought a story I'd written and drawn
myself. NOT for future employment, but just for
an overall critique.

He glanced at it, then handed it back to me after
only a minute of looking at it.

" it's not up to professional Standards. ", He told me.

" I know that, " I replied.... " I just wanted you to see it
because you write the X Men and I respect you
because you do a great job! " I told him enthusiastically.

" Thanks. " he said, and walked off.

I didn't like him so much after that, though I read the
X Men for several more years, until fall of 1989. That was
when the book lost its "One big X family" type feel and
began to take on a new direction that I had difficulty
relating to.

I'd rather have shown that multi part story ( Using heroes
of my own making. ) to Jack Kirby. Now THAT would
have been a great memory!

\:\)


Thanks for your response, Beardguy.

Sorry about the Claremont thing. But take heart, there's as many really kind and supportive creators as there are abrasive egomaniacs in the comics field. Don't let one rude experience discourage you. Lots of others would be glad to look at your stuff and give you feedback.

I've had some similar responses when I've shown my stuff to other creators. Although I mostly submitted stuff to them by mail.
I've gotten nice encouraging letters from Karen Berger, Richard Corben, Sean Deming (a former editor for Eclipse), Will Eisner, and a few others.

Deming sent me a discarded AIRBOY script, with hand written notes on it by Chuck Dixon, warmly welcoming penciller Stan Woch back to the series (AIRBOY # 33). It was the first comic script I'd seen, that by example, showed me how to format a complete script.

I also got responses to submissions with similar guidelines from Randy Stradley (Dark Horse), and Tom DeFalco (Marvel's then-editor-in-chief, in the post-Shooter era).

But I also had an encounter somewhat similar to your experience with Claremont:

Jim Starlin, who I met at a show in Miami in February 1993, similarly wouldn't look at my stuff. He raised his voice a little bit when I pulled out my script for him.
He said that he used to look at scripts, until he published WARLOCK, and some fanboy bitterly accused Starlin of stealing the concepts in that series from a script he'd shown Starlin a year or two prior. So he said since then, he doesn't look at people's work.

Grim business, that.

Conversely, one time, I mailed a script I wrote to Scott Hampton, to see if he'd want to draw it, a Twilight Zone-type story that partly dealt with runaways and child abuse.
He didn't send me a letter back.
Instead he called me at home, and spoke to me for an hour on his tab, offering me suggestions, primarily that I expand it to a graphic novel instead of a 7-page story, and I'd have a better likelihood of selling it. That was about the most encouraging and considerate response I got from a comics creator.
I'd intended to expand my story to a graphic novel as Hampton suggested, but you know... life intervened. And I never got around to it. But I still plan to.

He also suggested that whether you're a writer or an artist, a good way to get your foot in the door is to find a professional who likes your work and can collaborate with you. That way there's a name connected to the project that a publisher already knows, and they're more willing to publish it.
As it turned out, Hampton told me he was working on a similar project at that time, with writer Archie Goodwin, that also dealt with child abuse, so he didn't want to do two similar stories at the same time.
The BATMAN:NIGHT CRIES graphic novel he described was published about 6 months after we spoke.

I've heard Claremont can be rather rude to fans. He has a reputation similar to Harlan Ellison, he can be friendly, or he can be abrasive with fans, depending on his mood.

I met Ellison at the 1987 San Diego Con as well, and was a bit intimidated at first, by stories from friends who'd met him over the years before then.
One told me that when Ellison asked him during a literary discussion if he'd read Gulliver's Travels and responded to Ellison that no, he hadn't, Ellison had waved his hand in the guy's face in a dismissive gesture and said "Illiterate asshole...", and then Ellison ignored him and turned to others present.
So I was eager but hesitant to meet Ellison.

And I was very surprised how gracious and friendly Ellison was. He signed a few of my books.
And that was one of the highlights of the 1987 San Diego Con, when Ellison spoke in a large auditorium room for over an hour.
Ellison's presentation was part commentary on the industry, and part stand-up comedy. He was very funny. One example:
"Spiderman is swinging through the center of Manhattan 70 stories up, and there's not a bathroom in sight... and you thought that was an air conditioner !..."

He ripped on Jim Shooter a bit.
And on DC's censorship plans, to establish ratings, that had caused Alan Moore, Frank Miller, Marv Wolfman and others to resign, and to bash DC in the fan press.
Ellison and Frank Miller are friends, and Ellison sarcastically ripped on Miller's tittilating hint of lesbianism and prostitution surrounding Catwoman in BATMAN:YEAR ONE, that caused Miller to run up on stage and try to take the microphone from Ellison to respond, and Ellison wouldn't let him, and playfully kept the microphone at arm's length while Miller struggled for it.
The audience was doubled over with laughter watching this.

I had an advance registration and wore a nametag, and many of the writers and artists, who I'd never seen, were recognizable to me because of their nametags. And I was similarly recognizable to them.
I initially thought my wearing a nametag was a stupid idea, I mean, who the hell am I?
But it turned out to be a real blessing.

Some others I met at the 1987 San Diego Con were:

Sergio Aragones ( the guy is HUGE ! Well over six feet tall, I told him how much I like his MAD magazine and GROO work. He was very pleasant to speak with) ,
Joe Rubinstein (one of the best inkers of the late 70's/early 80's, not at all how I pictured him, he was a big bodybuilder type, with short dark hair and glasses. Also very friendly, but I would have guessed he was a cop, rather than a comic book artist),
John Muth (he also later appeared a few years later at a booksigning where I met him again, at Tropic Comics in Fort Lauderdale),
Berni Wrightson (who I also saw later, in December 1995 at a Tropic Comics booksigning, where he wasn't nearly as mobbed, and it was much easier to talk to him),
Chris Miller (who drew several portfolios for Pacific/Schanes&Schanes in the early 80's, and also did several backup stories for Eclipse, in SABRE, if I recall. Very friendly guy),
Michael Thibideaux (also very friendly, he'd been an inker on Kirby's CAPTAIN VICTORY and SILVER STAR, and had just begun publishing a VIKING HEROES series, which was somewhat similar to "the Warriors Three" from THOR. Fun stuff, and he was an absolute pleasure to chat with. ),
Peter Sanderson (Who was a jerk to me. He was one of the first pro's I saw at the convention. I saw his nametag, and said "Hey, Peter Sanderson..." and I started walking over to talk to him, having read many of his letters and articles. And real snotty, he snarls at me and mocks me going "Yeahhh, yeahhh, it's Peter Sanderson... " and walked away with whoever was walking beside him. I have absolutely no idea why he'd react as he did. What an asshole ! I've never given a second look to anything he's done since. ),
Kurt Goldzung (Marketing Director for First Comics, who I knew for years as a comic store owner in Hollywood, Florida, from 1979-1985, before he closed his store to work for First Comics. ),
Rick Oliver (Editorial Director for First Comics, who recognized me from my letters. Again, very friendly, and we talked a long time. I loved what First was publishing at that time, and for four years prior, and lavished unbridled praise on him for the work First was producing. He let on some behind the scenes, of the inner workings of First, and upcoming projects at that time.),
Karen Berger (who also recognized me from my letters to WONDER WOMAN, SWAMP THING, and other books she edited.
And in addition to being very personable, holy geez, what a beautiful woman !!
She showed me a bound folder of xeroxes for the BATMAN:SON OF THE DEMON graphic novel that was released soon after.),
Julius Schwartz (Incredibly friendly and approachable, he reminded me of my own grandfather. Despite his being one of the grandmasters of comics, I had absolutely no competition to speak with him),
Peter Gillis (who actually saw my nametag and approached me before I saw him, having recognized my name from my letters to his books, and spoke to me a long time. He gave me a lot of behind the scenes about SHATTER, that he was working on at the time. ),
Mark Evanier (he was inundated with fans, so we spoke very briefly. ),

Robert Silverberg, George Clayton Johnson, Claremont, and Harlan Ellison, who sat at a table discussion about censorship. A provocative discussion.
The playful bickering between Ellison and Silverberg was priceless.
Ellison was very "free enterprise/anything goes" about editorial control, and Silverberg argued for more editorial responsibility and restraint.
Silverberg brought up a series called "Rapeman" that he said is published in Japan, a storyline that focuses around a thug that anyone can hire to rape and humiliate any woman the person who hires him has a grudge with, and Silverberg said that the series has no redeeming cultural value, that it's just cruel and vicariously sadistic trash, saying that now they wanted to publish this series in the United States, and asked Ellison if they should be allowed to do this. Ellison was stuttering and flabergasted, absolutely tongue-tied, which invoked laughter and wild applause from the audience, that a guy as eloquent as Ellison could be so tongue-tied by such an argument.
At one point during the panel discussion, Byron Preiss, who was sitting one row in front of me, stood up to make a comment about editorial responsibility, from his own publishing experience. I had no clue it was Preiss, until he stood up with a question and announced himself.
Preiss' own projects, including THE ILLUSTRATED HARLAN ELLISON, published in 1978, which includes a breathtaking version of Ellison's short story "Repent, Harlequin, said the Ticktockman..." illustrated by Jim Steranko that, along with other material in the anthology book, is a wonderful contribution to the field of comic book art.
As are many other Byron Preiss books from the late 70's, such as Steranko's CHANDLER illustrated book, THE STARS MY DESTINATION adaptation by Howard Chaykin, WEIRD HEROES anthology, and FICTION ILLUSTRATED series.
Preiss was dressed very professionally in a navy blue suit--so unlike the rest of us !--- and was an impressive individual, even among the likes of Ellison and Silverberg.

R.A. Jones, AMAZING HEROES columnist and sometimes comics scripter. I loved his later 1989 four-issue SINBAD miniseries, illustrated by M.C. Wyman, and a second 1990 oneshot western called PISTOLERO, also illustrated by Wyman.
I complimented him profusely for his "Royal Review" of Kirby's best stories that he did in AMAZING HEROES 100 --Jones' contribution to a book-length tribute to Jack Kirby-- selecting his perceived best from the span of Kirby's entire career.


( full-size image at: )
http://fullsize.48.GIF




( full-size image at: )
http://fullsize.51.GIF



http://fullsize.1.GIF




http://fullsize.143.GIF

Accompanying R.A. Jones was Tony Isabella. I let on that some of my favorite stories he's written were some issues of WHAT IF?, for Marvel.
They were just two guys I struck up a conversation with, and it was evening, so we weren't wearing nametags, and about 15 minutes into the conversation, I introduced myself and told them my name. And they told me theirs. I said "Holy crap, I know you guys ! I've read your stuff !"

When I first went in the front entrance the first day at the San Diego Con, there was a guy who looked just like Frank Miller, who was wearing an "I'M NOT FRANK MILLER" t-shirt. After seeing Frank Miller later in the show, I think it actually WAS Frank Miller, wearing the t-shirt so he wouldn't get mobbed.

I first saw Harlan Ellison in one of the dealer rooms, looking for back issues. I turned around, and holy shit, there's Harlan Ellison standing right next to me !!
He turned to the dealer I'd just been talking to, and said he was trying to complete his back issue run of CAPTAIN MARVEL JR. issues.
I couldn't believe that this famous author, who for years I'd admired, and for years struggled to collect all his books, who I'd seen interviewed on television like a Hollywood celebrity (which he is) was suddenly so accessible, standing right there next to me.
I also couldn't believe he was a fanboy, just like me, going through bins looking for back issues. I didn't talk to Ellison at that point, I was too awed and speechless. I had another opportunity later.
Many, actually.
I kept unwittingly strolling into places where he was.

I was just amazed thoughout the San Diego Con, that every time I turned around, there was another god of the industry, whose work I've admired for years, that I could just walk up to, and thank for the many hours of great storytelling they provided me, and openly discuss their work, often able to chat at length with them.

Even four days at San Diego Con is not enough. No matter how many creators you talk to, there are dozens of others you wish you had time to talk with.
I've been to many conventions, but I never saw anything like this one. Usually, at most conventions, there are between 5 and 20 creators, but at this show there were hundreds. Virtually everyone in the field.

But there were two main events of the Convention:
First was Harlan Ellison's one-man-show monologue presentation.
And the other was an appreciation of Jack Kirby, with many panels discussing issues related to Jack and his art.

Another panel discussion I sat in on was a Marvel panel sitting in front of a barely-civil audience that cried out for the return of Kirby's artwork to the artist.
This was the 25th anniversary of Marvel (1961-1986), and despite Marvel's hyping the hell out of the event over the past year, Kirby was still not given any credit anywhere for his massive contribution to Marvel's creation.


There were ads that ran during Marvel's 25th anniversary in many Eclipse comics from that year (1986-1987), with a photo of Jack Kirby, and the caption:
"Marvel's 25th Anniversary: WHAT ABOUT JACK ?" Paid for by the friends of Jack Kirby.

And needless to say, during the 1987 San Diego Con panel discussions, the panel of Marvel editors were feeling the heat of barely restrained fanboy rage. You could definitely feel the widespread hostility toward Marvel, for its poor treatment of Marvel's greatest contributor. Second only in contribution to Stan Lee, but even THAT's a point that can be argued, whether Kirby or Lee can be most credited with Marvel's success.

It was a watershed year for giving Kirby his due.




( fullsize version of this image at:
http://fullsize.23.GIF )
( This image is TALES TO ASTONISH 23, a pre-Marvel cover by Kirby from September 1961, two months before FANTASTIC FOUR # 1. It demonstrates that many of the conventions of Silver Age Marvel fight scenes by Kirby, terrorizing locals of New York, smashing through buildings, and crowds of people screaming in the streets, were conventions of Kirby's in his pre-Marvel monster stories, from 1958-1963, long before it became the "house style" for Marvel, in the peak Marvel period from 1963-1970 )


Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-19 12:30 PM
Wow! You've met a Lot of Great talent!!

That's great.


I failed to mention that there was a new DC
artist at the same Comic Con I went to in
Spring '83 in Philly that actually asked to
see my sketch book. He was encouraging
and made a few suggestions, too.

I liked him. He was very nice. I forget his
name. I hope he has had a long and
distinguished career as a Comic book
artist.
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-27 2:41 AM
Well you guys might appreciate the first few lines from the Monster Magnet song Melt!

Quote:

Wakin' up, I watch another sun go down
Another day spent underground
In my world of pills
And I was thinkin' how the world should have cried
On the day Jack Kirby died
I wonder if I'm ill
I'll never trust myself again
But I don't care
Just set that plastic soul on fire
And watch it melt

Life is good, a rocket sled utopia
A self imposed myopia
You gotta love this pace
Life is fast, a million winners everyday
You tell me, is this work or play
I'm never really sure
I'll never trust myself again
But I don't care
Well just set that plastic soul on fire
And watch it melt

Well I'm alive, now you watch me go
A tickle inside my brain
Where it comes from I don't know
But I'm laughin' in the flames
It's just the look in your eyes
I feel like I can fly
And then sometimes I dig it so much, I could die

I'll never make no mortal place
'Cause I don't care
Just set that plastic world on fire
And watch it melt

Well I'm alive, now you watch me go
A tickle inside my brain
Where it comes from I don't know
But I'm laughin' in the flames
It's just the look in your eyes
I feel like I can fly
And then sometimes I dig it so much, I could die




Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-27 5:54 AM
Monster Magnet was a cool group. I like them.

Thanks for posting those lyrics.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-27 7:18 AM
Thanks for posting that, Nowhereman.

It's nice to see Jack Kirby get some mention outside of comics.

I was surprised, when Kirby died, TIME magazine summarized Kirby's work in about 40 words or less on their "Milestones" page.
That seemed a remarkably short tribute to one who is arguably the primary shaper and influence on what is a uniquely American art form.

As G-Man partly said, he is what Elvis and Picasso were to their chosen fields. The undisputed king.

The time is getting close for the 10th anniversary of Kirby's death, so I thought I'd post the obituary I saved, of where I first heard the news:

 Quote:
Fort Lauderdale SUN-SENTINEL, Tuesday, February 8, 1994:



JACK KIRBY, COMIC BOOK ARTIST

Sun-Sentinel wire services.

Jack Kirby, the artist who helped re-invent the comic book superhero for a new generation, with such successes as Captain America, Spiderman, Fantastic Four and the Incredible Hulk, has died of heart failure. He was 76.

Mr. Kirby died on Sunday [ February 6, 1994 ] at the family's home in suburban Thousand Oaks [California ] after a short illness.

Mr. Kirby worked at powerhouse comic book publishers Marvel and DC, to help develop characters such as X-Men, Spiderman, the Fantastic Four and Incredible Hulk. A frequent collaborator was editor and writer Stan Lee.

"Jack Kirby is to comics what Picasso is to modern art," said Greg Theakston, a comic art collector and publisher in New York.
"They [Kirby and Picasso] were each there at the birth of their new art form, and strongly influenced it, even defined what the form was."



"He created not only artwork, but ideas," said Tom Christopher, a Marvel Comics inker and friend.

Mr, Kirby oversaw the 1960's rebirth of the superhero as a more human, more vulnerable character, and helped stretch the genre's traditionally short stories into the issue-length format of contemporary comics.

Mr. Kirby was born Jacob Kurtzberg in Manhattan. As an aspiring young artist, he teamed up with writer Joe Simon at Timely Publications in New York [ in 1941 ], which was later to become Marvel Comics.

Their first hero was Captain America, created in the dark days shortly before World War II began, to personify America's fighting spirit.


This article is infuriatingly brief, and at several points, which I partly corrected, innaccurate. Kirby's real name was mis-spelled.
And although I left it in, it's debatable whether Kirby created Spider Man, or just simply did a new cover that was used (the famous one by Kirby from AMAZING FANTASY 15), because Ditko's was rejected.


Kirby claims (in his COMICS JOURNAL interview) that he created Spiderman, and then the concept was developed by Lee and Ditko. But others have disputed this.

This article also comes far short of describing the full breadth of Kirby's influence over more than five decades of comics history, and ongoing.

Beyond Captain America, Kirby (with Simon) also went to DC in 1942-1943 and co-created the Newsboy Legion, Manhunter, Boy Commandos, and a new Sandman series. All popular regular features, in STAR SPANGLED COMICS, ADVENTURE COMICS, and BOY COMMANDOS.

In the late 1940's and early 1950's, Simon and Kirby created the first Western and romance comics.
Simon and Kirby also created their own publishing company, publishing such titles as BOYS RANCH, FIGHTING AMERICAN, STRANGE WORLD OF YOUR DREAMS, JUSTICE TRAPS THE GUILTY, FOXHOLE, BULLSEYE and BLACK MAGIC.

In every genre of comics, Simon and Kirby were leaders, and their style was widely imitated, partly causing Kirby to re-invent his style, after parting with Simon (who left the comic book field to pursue an art career in the advertising field, during a comic industry slump in 1955, largely brought on by creation of the Comics Code, where creative jobs in the comic industry largely evaporated).
And Kirby's late 1950's/1960's style is now likewise widely imitated, as his earlier style was.

In his quest to stay fully employed, Kirby ventured back to DC in 1955, and created CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN, the first Silver Age superhero group (first appearing in SHOWCASE 6, Feb 1957), and instantly made a huge impact on this new comics era. One can easily see parallels between CHALLENGERS and Lee/Kirby's later 1961 team book, the FF.
Kirby also did a lot of monster and science fiction stories for DC, appearing in HOUSE OF MYSTERY, MY GREATEST ADVENTURE, TALES OF THE UNEXPECTED, and other titles.

Kirby's SKYMASTERS syndicated newspaper strip (similar to CHALLENGERS) was the source of a legal clash with DC editor Jack Schiff, and resulted in a mutually hostile departure by Kirby from DC.

Kirby then took work at Atlas/Marvel from 1958-forward, putting virtually all his creative energy into war, western, romance, and monster stories for Marvel, in titles such as BATTLE, LOVE ROMANCES, TWO GUN KID, RAWHIDE KID, and most importantly STRANGE TALES, JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, TALES OF SUSPENSE and TALES TO ASTONISH, among others.
From these latter titles would evolve Marvel's superheroes, and the monsters and villians their heroes would fight.

And in between Marvel assignments in the late 1950's, Kirby also managed to squeeze in additional work and leave his impact on other publishers, doing work for Archie, Charleton and Harvey, creating DOUBLE LIFE OF PRIVATE STRONG, ADVENTURES OF THE FLY, RACE FOR THE MOON, BLAST OFF, and other work. But Kirby obviously found his greatest success at Marvel.

Some key milestones from Kirby's most prolific creative period:

FANTASTIC FOUR 1 (November 1961), intro/origin, the FF.
TALES TO ASTONISH 27 (Jan 1962), first Ant-man story (one-shot).
HULK 1 (May 1962), origin/first appearance of Hulk.
AMAZING FANTASY 15 (August 1962), first appearance Spiderman, classic Kirby cover.
JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY 83 (Aug 1962), origin/first appearance Thor.
TALES TO ASTONISH 35 (Sept 1962), Ant-man series begins.
TALES OF SUSPENSE 39 (March 1963), origin/first appearance Iron Man, Kirby/Don Heck art.
SGT FURY AND HIS HOWLING COMMANDOS 1 (May 1963)
AVENGERS 1 (Sept 1963)
X-MEN 1 (Sept 1963)
JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY 97 (Oct 1963), "Tales of Asgard" series begins
AVENGERS 4 (March 1964), golden age Captain America revived.
TALES TO ASTONISH 59 (November 1964), Captain America series begins again.
STRANGE TALES 135 (August 1965) Nick Fury:Agent of SHIELD series begins.
FANTASTIC FOUR 44 (Nov 1965) intro the Inhumans, Sinnott inks begin.
FANTASTIC FOUR 48 (March 1966) intro Silver Surfer and Galactus.
THOR 179 (Aug 1970) last Kirby issue
FANTASTIC FOUR 102 (Sept 1970) last Kirby issue, Kirby leaves Marvel.



Unsatisfied with the way many of the Marvel characters he created were being developed by Lee and others, and feeling a lack of credit for even the stories he was able to create himself, Kirby left Marvel in 1970.
(Stan Lee was taking credit for much of Kirby's story plotting work, and creations. The Silver Surfer, for example, was a character Stan Lee saw for the first time when Kirby handed him the pencils for FANTASTIC FOUR 48, it was not something Lee had scripted, and yet Silver Surfer is widely believed to be a Lee creation, while Lee developed the character with John Buscema in a much different direction than Kirby had envisioned.)

Kirby left to work for DC in 1970, where he was not only able to draw, but also to write and edit the work he created. Kirby began with JIMMY OLSEN 133 (in October 1970), soon followed by FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, and MISTER MIRACLE. An innovative set of new books, the Fourth World series, with an ambitious concept, modern mythology, symbolism, and social commentary, that was intended to be more than an ongoing episodic series, and instead intended to have a limited run that came to a clear and full conclusion.

But others at DC said Kirby's books were not selling, and so FOREVER PEOPLE and NEW GODS were cancelled in 1972, and MISTER MIRACLE was cancelled also in 1974. This was a huge blow for Kirby, his most personal signature work cancelled out from under him.
Based on this, Kirby left DC as soon as his contract ended in late 1975, and returned to Marvel.

But not before producing another massive collection of new characters and series, in THE DEMON, KAMANDI, WEIRD MYSTERY TALES, FORBIDDEN TALES OF DARK MANSION, DAYS OF THE MOB, SPIRIT WORLD, O.M.A.C., SANDMAN, OUR FIGHTING FORCES, JUSTICE INC., FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL, KOBRA, and others.

And then Kirby returned to Marvel from 1976-1978, and created another flood of new characters, in THE ETERNALS, CAPTAIN AMERICA, 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY, MACHINE MAN, BLACK PANTHER, and DEVIL DINOSAUR. And though not appreciated by Marvel at the time, these stories generated new distinctly Kirby approaches to characters that were loved by many readers, and have since been revived and imitated.

Kirby's final great contribution to the comics field was creation of CAPTAIN VICTORY in late 1981, launching the first creator-owned mainstream comic book, and also launching the first title by a new independent publisher, Pacific Comics, which also for the first time in comic books, gave royalties to the creator of the series, and pressured Marvel and DC to do likewise for their creators, which in a short period of time they did.
DESTROYER DUCK, a benefit book Kirby later also did for Pacific Comics in 1982, to assist writer Steve Gerber in his legal struggle against Marvel for the rights to Howard the Duck, was likewise yet another milestone for the comics field.

The point of saying all this --and even this lengthy summary doesn't fully account for all Kirby's achievement and influence !-- is to give some idea how much more than his obituary indicates, just how much influence Jack Kirby has had, and continues to have, on the comic book field.

In 1986, I read an article (by Doug Moench in AMAZING HEROES 100)that speculated upwards of 80% of comics creators then employed working on characters and visual storytelling techniques that Kirby created.


Looking at just a few examples, the work of George Perez, Jose Ladronn, series like SAVAGE DRAGON, SUPREME, and 1963, continuations of the NEW GODS and other Fourth World series in various forms, Darkseid as a major villain in the DC universe, and the standard characters and props of virtually every Marvel comic produced over the last 43 years...

Kirby's impact on the field endures.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-27 8:01 AM
One other interesting anecdote about Kirby's death in 1994.

I didn't read this, but was told it by a comic shop owner, John Chruscinski, of Tropic Comics in Fort Lauderdale.

Kirby's death coincided with a big earthquake in Los Angeles, that preceded Kirby's death by a few days.

When Kirby was having pains in his chest, he went to a hospital to have it checked out, and he seemed to be okay. But the hospital would normally have done more tests, and because they were inundated with patients from the earthquake, they sent him home, for a follow-up in a few days. Kirby apparently collapsed in his yard and died a day or two later.

I don't know how accurate that is. But John has a lot of professional friends in the comic industry, and attends many conventions, so I presume he heard this from someone who knows the Kirby family well.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-27 8:57 AM
 Quote:
Nowhereman said:
Yeah,Dick Dillin thats the guy!


Dillin also died of a heart attack, and I think he was pretty young. He died rather suddenly and unexpectedly in 1980, I think JLA 183 was his last issue, and George Perez began pencilling the book immediately after, concluding the JLA/New Gods crossover story Dillin had begun.

Dillin, to my knowledge, got his start as part of the new talent Neal Adams helped into the field in 1970-1971. Some of his earliest assignments were a short story in HOUSE OF SECRETS 82 (Nov/1969) and SUPERMAN 249 (the origin of Terra-Man, March 1972), both inked by Neal Adams, which I'm sure helped him get published.

I see Dillin's work as similar to Irv Novick's (although Novick had been in comics for at least two decades prior to Dillin), and I love Novick's BATMAN and DETECTIVE stories, Written mostly by O'Neil and Robbins, and mostly inked by Dick Giordano.

Aside from JLA, I remember Dillin fondly for his work on WORLD's FINEST during the 1970's.


 Quote:
Nowhereman said:

Gotta disagree about the comparison to Elvis!
Elvis was a great singer up to when he died (ok so live he was mostly in a drugged up stupor) and to my mind actually released some of his best records!

Kirby didnt deteriorate either,his style stayed the same so to me all his work looked nasty!
There were far superior artists from the 30's onwards who dont get half the credit Kirby does!
To my mind the only reason Kirby has been given the stature he has is due to the fact when Marvel launched in the 60's,he pencilled the bulk of the titles giving him an iconic status far beyond his actual talent!


Kirby's cleanest and most realistic art was during the 1964-1970 period. Especially 1965-1966, on JOURNEY/THOR 116-140, and FF 41-60.


But even in the periods before and after, I think Kirby is a masterful storyteller. His visual narrative is very clear, and although less detailed than some artists, he knows how to tell a story with clarity, better than some artists who may be technically better and more detailed.
Kirby's influence stems from many other artists adapting and using the storytelling conventions Kirby created.

I certainly have great respect for many other artists in comics who preceded him or were his contemporaries in the 1940's and 1950's, such as Hal Foster, Alex Raymond, Will Eisner, Bob Kane, Joe Shuster, Jerry Siegel, Lou Fine, Mac Raboy, Jack Cole, Matt Baker, L.B. Cole, Frank Frazetta, Wallace Wood, Al Williamson, Steve Ditko, Joe Kubert and Carmine Infantino.
All giants in the field.

And if I were to pick another grandmaster of the field other than Kirby to devote a topic to, for their influence as well as their work, it could easily be Carmine Infantino, Neal Adams, Will Eisner, or Joe Kubert.

Or from the more current era, Jim Steranko, Michael Kaluta, Barry Windsor-Smith, Berni Wrightson, Richard Corben, Jim Starlin, Paul Gulacy, Arthur Suydam, Charles Vess, Tim Conrad, Scott Hampton, John Muth, Craig Russell, Michael Golden, Marshall Rogers, Paul Smith, John Bolton, Walt Simonson, Mike Grell, Frank Brunner, George Perez, Adam Hughes, Frank Cho, Stuart Immomen, Mike McKone, Carlos Pacheco, Jose Ladronn, Mike Mignola and many others.
Although all the names after Corben I listed are, despite having produced great work, not really influential on other artists like those I listed before Corben.



But regardless, I greatly enjoy their work and their various levels of influence on the field, and it's certainly no slap in their faces that I'm praising Kirby here.

But I do think Kirby deserves credit for his massive contribution, in terms of characters he created, influence of his art style, and just the sheer volume of his output, and tenacity in a field that often screwed him. He worked hard, produced many memorable stories, and certainly earned the love and loyalty of his fans, and fellow professionals.

I'm very grateful for the many hours of great reading his work has given me. And continues to give me.

--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-01-29 10:17 AM
From 1989, this cover, one of many fun tributes to Kirby, in characters and series by
other creators:
KIRBY, KING OF THE SERIALS !



larger/clearer image of same cover:
http://fullsize.1.GIF


I also love "Father Kirby" in the funeral scene of JUSTICE LEAGUE 40 (July 1990),
by J.M. DeMatteis and Kevin Maguire.



http://fullsize/.40.GIF


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-02-05 3:15 PM




http://fullsize.294.GIF



From the opening splash page of LEGION OF SUPERHEROES 294 (December 1982), by Paul Levitz, Keith Giffen and Larry Mahlstedt :

"Dedicated to Jack Kirby, with respect and thanks."



Beyond this statement, the entire story itself is a visible tribute to Jack Kirby, particularly Giffen's art style at the time. (see also his Dr. Fate backup strip in FLASH 306-313, several scattered issues he did of DC COMICS PRESENTS, and in OMEGA MEN 1-5).
This issue (LSH 294) concluded the "Great Darkness Saga" which is a particularly satisfying attempt to bring Kirby's original NEW GODS saga to a close.
And the entire Levitz/Giffen run of this series (LSH 285-306) is one of my all-time favorite comic series. It captures a similar feel to the combined humor, adventure, eye-popping art, and a huge cast of characters previously in Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run (issues 133-139, 141-148).

Giffen's style changed dramatically after issue 306. But his run continued until issue 313, and then LEGION issues 1-5 of the new series (3rd series, 1984). Although these are a bit darker and more serious, and the art is not as Kirby influenced.

Also good at roughly the same time was the X-MEN/NEW TEEN TITANS one-shot by Chris Claremont, Walt Simonson and Terry Austin. Which also came very close to the characters and visual style of Kirby's original NEW GODS series.
I consider Walt Simonson the closest successor to Kirby's hard-impacting visual style. And yet Simonson is not an imitation of Kirby, as so many other artists are. Simonson captures the flavor of Kirby, while maintaining a style all his own. And is also one of the nicest guys in comics you could hope to meet.

Both the Darkess Saga and the X-MEN/TITANS crossover came out in the late Summer of 1982.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-02-06 5:55 PM


From SWAMP THING 27, by Alan Moore, Steve Bissette and John Tottleben ( August 1984), concluding a three-part story that guest starred The Demon in all three issues:


"This story is dedicated with awe and affection to JACK KIRBY"





http://fullsize.27.GIF


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-02-06 6:16 PM
Walt Simonson's appreciation and tribute to Kirby is also clear in much of his work, particularly in Simonson's THOR run ( issues 337-380 ).

As this comparison demonstrates:

THOR 126 (March 1966) art by Kirby/Colletta:


...and THOR 338 (December 1983) by Simonson.


Among many other covers and panels, that are in clear homage to Kirby's run on JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR.

http://large.126.gif
http://large.338.gif


And the first cover of Simonson's run really got things off to a riproaring start:




http://large.338.gif


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 4:50 AM


John Byrne is largely the one who started the "taking Marvel series back to their roots" movement in the early 1980's.

Byrne began working on FANTASTIC FOUR as penciller in 1979-1980 (issues 209-218, 220-221).
But his real contribution began with issue 232, where he began his run as writer/penciller/inker, and he took the series back to the Lee/Kirby spirit, and the quaint little characterizations of the first 102 issues of the series.

Here's the cover of FF # 1 (November 1961)...



...paired with Byrne's tribute to it.
I loved what, to my knowledge, Byrne began: tribute covers.
Like this one, from FF 264 (in 1984), paying homage to the earliest Lee/Kirby and Lee/Ditko runs of Marvel titles, taking them back to their roots, and fully appreciating those roots.

http://fullsize.1.GIF
http://fullsize.264.GIF


And again, this cover Byrne did for a special issue of WHAT IF, where the FF are still heroes, even without their powers. A story that melded concepts of the FF with the story concepts of their predecessor, CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN ( which Kirby created in 1957-1958):


http://fullsize.36.GIF

and this last image, from FF 271, a tribute to the Lee/Kirby pre-Marvel monster stories in JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, STRANGE TALES, TALES OF SUSPENSE, TALES TO ASTONISH, STRANGE WORLDS, WORLD OF FANTASY and other titles featuring the pre-Marvel 1958-1963 science fiction/monster stories.
And the early years of FANTASTIC FOUR, HULK, SPIDERMAN, THOR, Ant-man, Dr Strange and others largely began as similar monster stories, and evolved from those roots.



http://fullsize.271.GIF

I loved this story, that continued for two additional issues, in FF 271-273. A great time travel story to an alternate future on a parallel earth, in search of Reed Richards' long-lost father.

Around the same time, Roger Stern began working his magic in AMAZING SPIDERMAN (issues 224-250), and PETER PARKER (issues 49-58) where Stern taps into Spiderman's Lee/Ditko roots, with many panels mimmicking a Ditko look.
Stern also worked a similar Lee/Ditko retro-look on DOCTOR STRANGE (issues 46, 48-73).
And Byrne did some really nice Ditko-esque wraparound covers on a three-issue Lee/Ditko reprint, in DOCTOR STRANGE CLASSICS, in 1983. (These reprint issues also have some nice pin-up pages, including the first Marvel work by then-unknown Arthur Adams).

And finally, toward the end of Byrne's FF run, here's Byrne's FF 291 cover:



Which bears more than a passing resemblance to the cover of ACTION COMICS # 1.
A clear precursor to the work he would do immediately after leaving the FF series.

http://fullsize.291.GIF
http://fullsize.1.GIF


Byrne's run ended with issue 293, from which he left to do MAN OF STEEL, SUPERMAN, ACTION COMICS, and other Superman work for DC, from 1985-1988.

( There's a partial checklist of Byrne's work, in another topic I started:
  • "John Byrne: The good years, the bad years, and what the heck went wrong?"
    HERE )





But I think for most of us who were reading at the time, Byrne's run remains arguably the best run on FF in its 40 years, outside of the initial Lee/Kirby run.

His appreciation for Kirby's work is obvious, in these images, as well as his other work on the FF, and other Marvel and DC characters.

--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."


Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 5:45 AM
Dave -

I'm glad this topic is not dead. I kept in my list
of Favorite Topics here, hoping it would come
back to life eventually.

Jack Kirby is my favorite comic book artist.
After him comes Curt Swan, John Buscema,
John Romita. I am an artist myself and my favorite art
comes from the impressionists and the realists,
such as David, Monet, Van Gogh, Latrec, Titian
Caravagio, Rembrandt, DaVinci, Ruebens, and others.

Jack - In my mind..Is in the after life right now,
discussing Art with these greats..learning from and teaching, too.

He gave us many good years of excellent art, and
wonderful memories of enjoying that art.

That is the hallmark of any great artist.
Posted By: jafabian Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 8:59 AM
Didja see what Mark Waid did in FF today?
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 9:30 AM
No..what DID Mark Waid do
in the Fantastic Four today???
Posted By: rexstardust Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 9:41 AM
I don't know the issue won't be out for a while.
Posted By: Joe Mama Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-18 9:43 AM
It came out today. Don't say anything without a "SPOILER" note as I haven't read it yet...
Posted By: Joe Mama Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-19 3:55 AM
Just read FF #511.

Wow. Just...wow.

Upon reading parts 1 & 2 of the storyline, I was thinking "There's no way Waid can do anything with this other than make it imaginary or a dream or the psyche of some villain. I'm gonna walk away from this storyline having enjoyed it, but not nearly as much as I could. The ending can't help but be at least a little disappointing..."

There are moments that I do truly enjoy being wrong. Sentimental? Yup. Sappy? I'd say so.

But a perfect ending? Oh yeah. I'm gonna hafta admit it: I walked away from the book very pleased. No disappointment here. 'Matter of fact, it pushed me to pick up either the Essential or Masterwork editions of FF.

Good stuff...
Posted By: jafabian Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-19 9:18 AM
Okay, I won't spoil it, but if you are a Jack Kirby fan, you'll appreciate the homage that Mark Waid pays Jack in here. He treats Jack like a GOD in this issue. It's a must read.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-25 7:05 AM
( From DAREDEVIL 233, August 1986, by Frank Miller and David Mazzuchelli, accompanying the story credits on page 1: )



"This issue respectfully dedicated to Jack Kirby"





The issue guest-stars Captain America, and the character is drawn in a very Kirby-esque 1964-1965-era Captain America style.

~

In listing all these dedications to Kirby, you can quickly see that they're dedicated by pretty much ALL of the major talents working in the comics field in the 1980's. All making clear their tribute, and love, for Kirby's work.

And no doubt, there are many other similar dedications I've missed.

Although as I've said, a vast percentage of ongoing Marvel and DC characters and series over the last 60 years are in themselves a tribute to Kirby's work.

~

Beardguy57, I like your vision of Kirby in the afterlife interacting with French impressionists and Rennaissance artists.
I don't know how much Kirby was into high art, but it's clear that he loved to draw, first in animation for Max Fleischer in the 1930's, and some newspaper strip work, before moving into a long career in comics. And Kirby considered himself very fortunate to spend a lifetime doing what he loved.
And who can ask for more than that?

~

Here's a link to some humorous anecdotes of Kirby, by some creators who knew Jack Kirby well, including Jim Steranko, and Scott Shaw.

http://www.twomorrows.com/kirby/articles/10storys.html

I especially enjoyed this recollection:

 Quote:
"King Of His Castle?"
by Peter Von Sholly
.
I visited the Kirbys at their home in 1976 and was duly awed by both the array of original artwork on the walls and the incredible hospitality I was shown.
Roz offered coffee and cake and Jack spun stories of World War II, his philosophy, the comics biz, etc.
But at one point, Roz came out of the kitchen and asked Jack to take the garbage out!
I was stunned.
Roz looked at me, smiled and said: "He may be the King, but I'm the Queen."
And Jack cheerfully took the garbage out.




--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-03-31 7:58 AM
Here's another great tribute to Kirby's early Marvel / pre-Marvel monster stories and FF run.



http://fullsize.347.GIF
http://fullsize.348.GIF
http://fullsize.349.GIF



FF 347-349.

Story by Walt Simonson, art by Arthur Adams and Gracine Tanaka, and inks by Art Thibert

These three issues are tremendous fun, with a holy host of monsters who hadn't seen the light of day in about 30 years, until their cameo appearances in this three-part story.

The story centers on the Mole Man and his Monster Island, with the creature from FF # 1(Nov 1961), along with cameo appearances of other monsters from these pre-Marvel stories:

  • "Van Doom, The Man Who Created a Creature" in TALES TO ASTONISH 17(March 1961),
  • "What was X, the Thing That Lived?" from TALES TO ASTONISH 20 (June 1961),
    and
  • "Titan" from TALES OF SUSPENSE 28 (April 1962),

as well as several others I can't name offhand.

Also great was inclusion of the Skrulls, who took on the role of pre-Marvel brand bug-eyed alien invaders.
In a funny scene, instead of the bug-eyed Skrulls terrifying local Earth people, the Skrulls themselves have the crap scared out of them by the monsters on Monster Island. Some of the facial expressions of the Skrulls are priceless.

Simonson's inclusion of a recently-gray-again Hulk worked well in the early-Marvel/pre-Marvel feel of the story too, since Hulk was gray in his earliest 1962 appearances. Although Simonson isn't the one who made the change back to gray (it was Peter David and Todd McFarlane who turned Hulk gray again in INCREDIBLE HULK issues 330-344, if I recall, and Simonson just continued the gray Hulk for his appearances in FF)

Around the same time, Marvel released a collected trade titled MONSTER MASTERWORKS, that reprinted 18 of the pre-Marvel monster stories from the 1958-1963 pre-Marvel era. "Van Doom", "X, the Thing That Lived" and "Titan" are all reprinted in this volume, which came out within a few months of the Simonson/Adams/Thibert FF story, in 1990.

FF 347-349 were collected with nicer printing in THE NEW FANTASTIC FOUR: MONSTERS UNLEASHED trade paperback, in 1992.

And reprinted again in the recent X-MEN LEGENDS, VOL. 3: ARTHUR ADAMS trade paperback, collecting these FF issues along with all the X-Men annuals Arthur Adams did.

Highly recommended.

Simonson also did a number of FF issues where he did both story and pencils ( FF issues 337-341, 343-346, 350), that I think rank with Byrne's FF run, as the best FF since the Lee/Kirby run. These and Art Adams's story in 347-349 were collected again in the FANTASTIC FOUR VISIONARIES: SIMONSON trade collection.

Which complements Simonson's other outstanding tribute to Kirby's run in THOR (in issues 337-380).

--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."



Posted By: casselmm47 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-04-05 4:47 PM
Excellent job with the Kirby info, Dave. Y'know, as a kid back in the 70's I really didn't appreciate his work (I was more of an Adams/Dillin/Swan/Aparo guy), but going into my teens I started to warm up to the King.

One thing about Dillin, though... he actually had a long and sizable career before his JLA days, illustrating the adventures of the Blackhawks from their Quality days up into their DC run. According to Amazing World of DC Comics #11, he actually got his start in Wing Comics for Williams in 1951.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-04-06 5:16 AM


Thanks for the praise Casselmm.

And for the correction about Dick Dillin as well. I'd initially thought Irv Novick entered comics in the late 60's as well, and later learned he's been doing comics since the 1940's.
Live and learn.

I'll look up that article you list, from AMAZING WORLD OF DC COMICS #11.

~


Another Kirby collaborator I've wanted to mention (whose reputation is as god-like in the comics industry as Kirby's own) is Steve Ditko.

I love the work they collaborated on together, in the 1958-1963 issues of JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, STRANGE TALES, TALES TO ASTONISH, TALES OF SUSPENSE, and scattered other covers and stories, including FF # 13 (introducing the Watcher and the Blue Area of the moon, that Byrne later re-drew from the Kirby/Ditko FF issue, in X-MEN 137)

Here's the main page for an outstanding Ditko website, the best I've seen for any comic book artist:

http://www.ditko.comics.org/

From the above site, here's an extremely rare photo of Steve Ditko.
I'd never seen a photo of Ditko, until the internet made one available. Ditko is extremely reclusive, and doesn't make himself available for fan press interviews.




And here's the section I appreciate the most:
An extraordinarily detailed checklist of Ditko's work.

You can look up stuff 3 different ways in this checklist:
1) alphabetically,
2) chronologically,
or
3) by specific publisher.

An amazing amount of work and user-friendliness went into this checklist. (A list like this should exist for Kirby ! )

http://www.ditko.comics.org/ditko/check/ditkoch.html





And finally, here's one of my favorite Kirby pencils /Ditko inks collaborations, the cover to STRANGE TALES # 80 (January 1961):





http://fullsize.80.JPG



And of course, the most famous Kirby/Ditko cover collaboration:


( fullsize image at: )
http://fullsize.15.GIF



---------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."


Posted By: Pig Iran Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-04-06 5:38 AM
Kirby is solely responsible for making me love comics.
I was about 6 at the time I read Marvel Treasury #11..the Fantastic Four. "This Man, This Monster" made me realize the power comics had....even at that young age. I didn't fully understand the story, but I did get the redemption and sacrifice angles, and that a hero comes from the unlikeliest of places.

Nowhereman, check out Kirby's 1970's Black Panther run. If you don't like that you may never like Kirby.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-04-06 6:23 AM


I enjoyed those issues too, Pig Iron. My favorite Jack Kirby Black Panther stories, though, are his first two appearances in FANTASTIC FOUR 52 and 53, back in 1966.


( larger images of these two covers)
http://fullsize.52.GIF
http://fullsize.53.GIF

And if you like those late 1970's BLACK PANTHER issues, you'd definitely enjoy what Jose Ladronn did in CABLE 48-67, that have a very strong 70's Kirby flavor to the art.
I especially enjoyed issue 54, which features the Black Panther.


( larger full-size image of this cover: )
http://fullsize.54.GIF



~


One of my favorite Kirby collaborations occurred in JIMMY OLSEN, the first series Kirby did for DC ( issues 133-139, 141-148) from 1970-1972, immediately after leaving Marvel.

[image]http://www.milehighcomics.com/cgi-bin/backissue.cgi?action=fullsize&issue=45526284144%20138[/image]




The covers on Jimmy Olsen offer a rare one-time collaboration between Jack Kirby and Neal Adams !



(link to clearer full-size image:
http://fullsize.138.GIF )

Kirby pencils, and Neal Adams inks, on this (issue 138)
and these other covers:





(links to larger/clearer images of these covers: )
http://fullsize.137.GIF
http://fullsize.141.GIF
http://fullsize.142.GIF
http://fullsize.144.GIF




These other covers are Neal Adams pencils and inks, without Kirby:




(larger/clearer images of these covers: )
http://fullsize.134.GIF
http://fullsize.135.GIF
http://fullsize.136.GIF
http://fullsize.148.GIF



These others are Kirby pencils with Mike Royer inks:




( larger/clearer images of these covers: )

http://fullsize.143.GIF
http://fullsize.146.GIF


And Kirby pencils, Murphy Anderson inks:




( larger/clearer image of cover: )
http://fullsize.145.GIF




And Kirby pencils/Vince Colletta inks, with Al Plastino inks on the heads of Jimmy Olsen and Superman:


( larger/clearer image of this cover:
http://fullsize.133.GIF )





And Kirby Pencils/ Vince Colletta inks, with Murphy Anderson heads of Jimmy Olsen and Superman
(which was also the interior art formula for most of Kirby's run on the series)...



( larger/clearer image of cover:
http://fullsize.139.GIF )





And finally, Neal Adams cover pencils/Murphy Anderson inks:



( larger/clearer image of this cover:
http://fullsize.147.GIF )



On the interior stories, Murphy Anderson( issues 135-139, 141-145, and 148 ) and Al Plastino (issues 133-134) were recruited to ink the heads of Superman and Jimmy Olsen, to "correct" Kirby's rendition of Superman characters to conform with the Swan/Anderson Superman style in the other Superman titles of the period. Kirby found this annoying and insulting to him as an artist, but I actually like it. Because of it, you get to see a lot of variety on Kirby's pencils on this series. I own a page of original art from issue 148 (page 11).

These covers are an artistic feast by themselves. But I love the interior stories even more. This run, for me, captures everything I enjoy about comics, and Kirby's work in particular: A great mix of adventure, humor, a huge cast of heroes, and Kirby keeps the reader floored with an endless stream of new worlds and visual wonders.

[ **the medium size images were slowing down the server, and didn't show you the detail of these covers anyway, so I deleted the medium-size images and replaced them mostly with thumbnails, with links below to full-size cover images, that you can click on to see the detail, for those who want to view them. ]


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-04-08 2:07 AM
For those who share my love for Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run, I highly recommend a few more recent books, that almost read like "lost episodes" of Kirby's run.

First, LEGENDS OF THE DC UNIVERSE 14 (March 1999), by Mark Evanier and Steve Rude:


(larger/clearer cover image: )
http://fullsize.14.GIF

Evanier and Rude also did a MR MIRACLE SPECIAL back around 1989-1990. Both these stories are very true to the 70's Kirby style.


And LEGENDS OF THE DC UNIVERSE 22 and 23 (Nov and Dec 1999), by Lofficier and Ladronn:



http://fullsize.22.GIF
http://fullsize.23.GIF

Which teams up Superman with scientist Dabney Donovan (mentioned but not seen in JIMMY OLSEN 142-143), and the two journey together to the planet Transilvane. Again, visuals that mesh very well with Kirby's art on the JIMMY OLSEN series.



---------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."


Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-05-12 6:34 AM
Jack Kirby is sad because no one is singing his praises
anymore.....
Posted By: Pariah Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-05-13 2:42 PM
Never cared much for him.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-05-13 11:16 PM
 Quote:
Originally posted by Beardguy57:
Jack Kirby is sad because no one is singing his praises
anymore..... \:\(


Well, it's a good thing you're here, then, Beardguy, to pick up the slack !
\:\)

Another series that wonderfully picks up and expands on Kirby's Fourth World series is FOREVER PEOPLE 1-6 (1988) written by J.M. DeMatteis, and illustrated by Paris Cullens and Karl Kesel.




( larger cover images HERE )


I'd especially recommend issue 5, and if you like that, then pick up the rest of the series.

Extremely well written, it captures well the themes of a shadow war being conducted on Earth between good and evil, for the possession of humanity.
The one side (Apokalips) limiting mankind's human potential, whispering notions of fear, anger and petty jealousy to humans, spreading doubts that drive individuals from reaching for greatness, and drive people apart with fear, resentment and fanaticism.
The other side (New Genesis) whispering inspiration, encouragement and love to humans, that presses individuals toward achieving their own potential and happiness, and sharing their happiness with others.

Like Kirby's original series, FOREVER PEOPLE 1-6 captures well a parallel pseudo-Biblical clash between good and evil, of spiritual warfare between two opposing sides, for the spiritual possession of mankind.

There are some minor elements I don't like about the series.
Contrary to developments in the 1988 miniseries, I like the idea of the Forever People as immortal gods, who are eternal symbols of each new generation, full of new ideas and hope for the future.
And I didn't like the way DeMatteis in this new series locks the Forever People into the 60's generation, and ages them, which in my eyes makes them largely cease to be an eternal image of each new generation.
Although the one generation, as DeMatties develops it, can still be a metaphor for each new generation, even though specifically representing only one generation (the 60's generation).

On the plus-side, DeMatteis' linking the Forever People to one generation allows exploration of the Forever People's (and by metaphor, the 60's generation's) descent (during the period from the end of the first series in 1972 till the beginning of this series in 1988) into middle-aged cynicism, disillusionment and complacency, and sends the Forever People on a rejuvinating rediscovery of the optimism of their youth, and a greater appreciation for the blessings in their lives.

Paris Cullins, without swiping from Kirby, does a wonderful job in his art of capturing the visual style of Kirby, with many Kirby-style three-panel and four-panel pages and splash pages, squared fingertips and faces, crackling energy and other Kirby-esque visual elements.

As I said in a letter to Marc DeMatteis at the time, it is an extremely provocative and well-thought-out expansion of Kirby's Fourth World series.

Kirby's Fourth World is rich in symbolic and literary elements, that lay the groundwork for vast expansion. Which FOREVER PEOPLE 1-6 beautifully explores.

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-05-15 10:23 PM
I now have ALL six Marvel Masterworks Fantastic Four books. It's really facinating to see how the stories and artwork progress from issue one to issue sixty....wow!

The characters grow as individuals, too.

And Kirby's art goes from very good to Amazing!!

I feel Jack did his BEST work on the FF from about
issue 42 to issue 100...his work matured into the style
he's best loved for.....those amazing two page negative
zone spreads.... fantastic fight scenes.. and the tender
moments between Reed and Sue....

First Inhumans storyline..Galactus... The Negative
Zone....all in the space of about Ten issues!!!

That is simply awesome!!!
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-06-05 7:23 AM
Dave The Wonder Boy:

I want to thank you for all the time and effort you've put
into this topic. All the links you posted, the comic book covers, etc, are just fantastic. ( Pun Intended. )

I just read where John Buscema died a couple years ago. I didn't know that. Just look him up on the Net.
He was a great artist! He was reluctant to do comics but as he said in an interview, it paid the bills...and he was right up there with Jack Kirby and Curt Swan, being my number three favorite comic book artist.

He died of stomach cancer at age 74.

The link below tells you more :

http://home.ca.inter.net/owenandsusan/bio.htm

He took over the artistic reigns after Jack left the FF with
his final issue being # 102. He had a great sense of humor, and was good at making deadlines. He was a dependable, great artist and a pretty cool guy, too.

He drew them, and the Avengers and many other comic
titles. He is suurvived by his wife, three children and several grandchildren.

I hope he, Jack Kirby and Curt Swan are together and talking about the good old days at Marvel in the afterlife, and are enjoying themselves. They sure earned with all
the work they did and how they gave us all something to cherish.

Goodbye, John. You will be missed.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-06-06 7:53 AM

Many thanks, Beardguy.

Sometimes it takes a LOT of edits to get those images right !

You share my love for the 60's and 70's material.



I agree on John Buscema (and Swan, Kane and many others). I was aware of Buscema's death because a tribute was posted on the old DC boards when he died. I posted a link to the tribute in my "What's the attraction of Silver Age books?" topic. ( Long gone now. )

Gil Kane, Dan DeCarlo, Kurt Schaffenberger, and Chuck Jones all died around the same time, and had similar tributes on the DC boards.




My favorite Buscema work, though, is his 20-year run on CONAN THE BARBARIAN, and even more so his work in SAVAGE SWORD OF CONAN. The Robert E. Howard adaptations especially, in issues 1-35.
I think the series had a dry period in issues 40-60, and then the magic was back from 60-100, plus a lot of great work by other artists in addition to Buscema.
The series changed gears around 150, and I mostly lost interest after that.

But Buscema was a huge deal in the late 60's/early 70's, on the first SILVER SURFER series(1968-1970), and AVENGERS(1969-1971).
And after Kirby left Marvel in 1970, Buscema took over THOR and FF for a few years.

The best interview I saw of Buscema was in the 1979 S.Q productions book, THE ART OF JOHN BUSCEMA. Which also had a beautiful poster-worthy montage of all the characters Buscema has drawn.

Buscema also did a TARZAN series for Marvel that was interesting from 1977-1979, if I recall. Buscema's work is very Hal Foster-influenced, and in that I find him very well suited to any adventure type stories he's done.

Info and photos of John Buscema:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Buscema


I actually read Buscema's FANTASTIC FOUR before I read Kirby's FF. The first Buscema issue I saw was FF 128, very much in the Kirby mode, with very detailed art, even for Buscema.
FF 128 also has a great 4-page insert centerfold of "friends and villains of the FF", printed on glossy stock.




I discovered reprints of the Lee/Kirby FF in MARVEL'S GREATEST COMICS within a month or two of reading FF 128, beginning with MARVEL'S GREATEST COMICS 38 (reprinting "This Man, This Monster", from FF 51. What a great place to start !)

I've put off posting to this topic for a while, Beardguy, I just wanted to have something to say before I posted here again.
I have to thank you for prodding my interest in the Marvel Masterworks FF reprints.

Since I last posted here, I picked up Volume 1 (reprinting FF 1-10, Nov 1961 to Jan 1963) and volume 6 (reprinting FF 51-61, June 1966 to Mar 1967).
The progress in Kirby's art (from FF 10 to FF 51) in less than four years is just amazing. And the collected hardcover glossy offset-printed format arguably allows greater appreciation of them than when they were originally printed.
I'm waiting for the other FF volumes (2, 3, 4, and 5) to arrive in the mail. I highly recommend e-bay. I saved a fortune !

And I've seen ads that volume 7 (reprinting FF 61-70) is due to be released in the next 30 days.
So it's great that Kirby's best-known work (FF) is only three volumes from being completely collected in hardcover.
And most of his other best-known work as well:
BOYS RANCH, FIGHTING AMERICAN, HULK, THOR, AVENGERS, X-MEN, CAPTAIN AMERICA (Golden Age, and TALES OF SUSPENSE).

And in trade form: JIMMY OLSEN, FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, and MISTER MIRACLE. Would that these were in comparable hardcovers, like the prior ones I listed.
But... it's just a matter of time.

A trade of Kirby's mid-70's CAPTAIN AMERICA "Mad Bomb" stories will be out in the next month or so as well.

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-07-07 9:41 AM
Dave The Wonder Boy:

I want to thank you for all the time and effort you've put
into this topic. All the links you posted, the comic book covers, etc, are
just fantastic. ( Pun Intended. )

I just read where John Buscema died a couple years ago. I didn't know that.
Just look him up on the Net.
He was a great artist! He was reluctant to do comics but as he said in an
interview, it paid the bills...and he was right up there with Jack Kirby and
Curt Swan, being my number three favorite comic book artist.

He died of stomach cancer at age 74.

The link below tells you more :

http://home.ca.inter.net/owenandsusan/bio.htm

He took over the artistic reigns after Jack left the FF with
his final issue being # 102. He had a great sense of humor, and was good at
making deadlines. He was a dependable, great artist and a pretty cool guy,
too.

He drew them, and the Avengers and many other comic
titles. He is suurvived by his wife, three children and several
grandchildren.

I hope he, Jack Kirby and Curt Swan are together and talking about the good
old days at Marvel in the afterlife, and are enjoying themselves. They sure
earned with all
the work they did and how they gave us all something to cherish.

Goodbye, John. You will be missed.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2004-07-12 2:08 AM
My latest find is a Marvel/DC amalgam book, INCREDIBLE HULK VS. SUPERMAN (story by Roger Stern, art by Steve Rude and Al Milgrom, cover-dated July 1999, and 48 beautiful pages)




The story begins with Superman and Lois (now married) in the present, and then goes into a flashback to 1963 or so, to an encounter Superman had with the Hulk, Banner, Rick Jones, General Ross, etc.
The flashback is to a time where Superman and Lois were rivals and not married, which is an interesting contrast between the two (present and early-60's-past) eras.

The art and story are very reminiscent of the earliest Kirby stories in HULK 1-6, and in early issues of AVENGERS.

Stern also does a version of Superman that is more true to the late-1950's Superman TV series than to the Superman comic. And Lois, Perry White, Clark and Superman are very charmingly their TV selves, rather than their comic book selves.
It's a very pleasant twist, that any Silver-Age fan should enjoy.

The story also has some very sexy panels of Betty Ross and Lois Lane.

It's amazing sometimes, how you can go through back-issue bins and run across untapped treasures that you never knew existed when they were originally released !
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-01-30 4:59 AM
Dave, that HULK VS SUPERMAN comic looks really interesting!
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-01-30 10:55 PM
Oh, it was great, Beardguy, highly recommended.

Another I love is SECRET CITY SAGA # 0, from 1993, story by Roy Thomas, art by Walt Simonson.
( Click on image to enlarge )

One of the nicest covers in comics history.

Simonson is among the most worthy successors to Kirby, I think he does a great job of capturing the power of Kirby's art, in several great tributes (MANHUNTER, THOR, FANTASTIC FOUR, the 1982 Marvel/DC X-MEN/TEEN TITANS special, ORION, etc.)
But Simonson does tribute to Kirby while producing something completely original. As opposed to just swiping from Kirby.

The other related books that stemmed out from SECRET CITY SAGA # 0 (SECRET CITY SAGA 1-4, BOMBAST 1, CAPTAIN GLORY 1, NIGHT GLIDER 1, and SATAN'S SIX 1-4) were a great tribute to Kirby and his previously unused story concepts, in a nice limited series, that is as much a tribute to Kirby as it is to early Marvel in general, with story and art by early-Marvel creators, such as Roy Thomas, Steve Ditko, Dick Ayers, Don Heck, John Severin, Mike Friedrich and Gerry Conway.




It was more or less an early Marvel staff re-union !

Which must have been very fun and nostalgic for the creators who participated in it.

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-01-30 11:03 PM
Dave, I like Walt Simonson, too! Roy Thomas has long been one of my favorite writers..Love his 60's work on The Avengers..and his 80's work on All Star Sqaudron.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-01-30 11:54 PM


I enjoy much of Roy Thomas' work too.

But oddly, to my knowledge, Kirby never collaborated with Roy Thomas.

What I love most from Roy Thomas is his CONAN, SAVAGE SWORD OF CONAN, and SAVAGE TALES work.
And also his later CONAN THE ADVENTURER with artist Rafael Kayanan.

And "Bran Mak Morn: Worms of the Earth" adaptation with Tim Conrad, in SAVAGE SWORD 16 and 17. (reprinted a few years ago as a graphic novel)

And "Almuric", in EPIC ILLUSTRATED 2-5, again illustrated by Tim Conrad, in 1980-1981 (also reprinted in a collected volume, by Dark Horse)

I talked a lot about Thomas' contribution, and showed covers for many of these stories in another topic:




I also enjoyed ARAK by Roy Thomas in the early 1980's, a deliberately Conan-esque creation by Thomas, when he left Marvel and went to DC in 1981.

And as you say, his ALL-STAR SQUADRON, INFINITY INC., and YOUNG ALL-STARS runs for DC in the 1980's, which resurrected the JSA to its modern prominence.

If I were to recommend just one issue of Thomas' ALL-STAR SQUADRON, it would be ALL STAR SQUADRON ANNUAL # 1 (1982)

Which links the origins of three Golden-Age characters, Wildcat, The Atom, and the Guardian.
It shows Thomas' vast knowledge of the characters he writes, on any series, and the way he can expand on that knowledge to explore ways to bind them together and tweak them for interesting little unexplored twists.



Although Kirby never collaborated with Thomas, to my knowledge, Kirby did produce a rather un-flattering portrayal of Thomas in MISTER MIRACLE # 6 (1972)


Where Kirby created Funky Flashman, a fast-talking con-artist prone to Stan Lee -esque alliteration and backslapping. And Flashman's groveling ass-kissing lapdog assistant HouseRoy, which are widely recognized as Kirby's expressed opinion on the subject of Stan Lee and Roy Thomas.







Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-01-31 12:04 AM
Hmmm..Jack cared NOT for Stan and Roy!

I looked up that Hulk vs Superman book on Ebay...
only ONE person has it to sell, and his feedback is too poor for me to feel good about buying it from him..so I put it on a Pre Order Request on Amazon.Com.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-02-24 8:46 AM
http://www.pigdogproductions.com/kirby1.jpg



Two images, which I couldn't separate:

On top, pages 2 and 3 of NEW GODS 5 (1972). Showing one of the race of giants trapped for eternity in the ruins of their machines, in their vain attempts to penetrate the mystery of the source.


And below, the wraparound cover for the KIRBY UNLEASHED portfolio, advertised in all the DC books in early/mid 1972.

Some of the most beautiful pages of Kirby's career.


The site this is sourced from:

https://www.pigdogproductions.com/index2.html

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-05-11 9:42 PM
JACK KIRBY is da King!! He and CURT SWAN were and still are my favorite two comic artists, with George Perez, Stuart Immomen, John Buscema, John Romita Jr., Jerry Ordway, and a few others whose names elude me all being tied for a close third place!

They both drew in a very realistic style that I loved.
I admit Jack started getting carried away drawing HUGE
biceps on his male characters, but that was part of the magic because we wanted our heroes to be muscular and powerful looking.

I emulated those two men's styles' when I was a kid, drawing superheroes on those big sheets of paper that your parents gave you for coloring. I used to write and draw my own comics from the time I was 10 till in my early thirties, and I plan on getting back into it again.

These two men were the BEST in comics during the '60's, and their work holds up quite well into the 21 st century!
Posted By: Captain Sweden Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-05-12 11:14 PM
I like Kirby because he had his unique style, very suitable for the fun, action-packed stories he did. Unfourtunately, his art doesn't speak to me in the emotional level Steve Ditko's art does, but I digress.

I have an old translated SC with two early FF comics, Kamandi in B/W and also translated, and the new Black Panther TPB. I plan to collect his 70's Captain America and Jimmy Olsen TPB's, maybe the B/W Fourth World TPB's too.
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2005-05-13 7:17 PM
Dave The Wonder Boy : I FINALLY recall the name of the young up and coming artist I met back in '83 at the same comic con where I met Chris Clairemont. His name was Paris Cullens! I remember he had some samples of his work there..it was GREAT!! He was and still is a great comic artist!

He was VERY nice. He was as nice to me as Clairemont had been rude. What a contrast!

Wonder what he's doing now?
I actually looked up Paris Cullins in a keyword search on two different occasions since I saw your post, Beardguy.
And I've been able to find nothing he's done in the last decade or so. He just slipped into oblivion.

I remember Cullins best for the FOREVER PEOPLE six-issue miniseries I posted about above, superbly written by J.M DeMatteis.
Cullins' other work that I'm familiar with is a lengthy NEW GODS run, in collaboration with Mark Evanier.

And prior to FOREVER PEOPLE and NEW GODS, Cullins did a mid 80's run of BLUE BEETLE. Issue two has an artist profile of Cullins, from his formative years, other professional work, breaking into comics, and then becoming regular artist on BLUE BEETLE, his first regular series.




Since I last posted to this topic, there's been a flood of Kirby reprint books. Here are just a few:

  • CAPTAIN AMERICA: MADBOMB, reprinting Kirby's work from CAPTAIN AMERICA 193-200

    CAPTAIN AMERICA: BICENTENNIAL BATTLES, reprinting the lengthy MARVEL TREASURY story from 1976 that has Captain America traveling through time and fighting in all the historical U.S. wars. Best of all was the first chapter, 10 pages of Jack Kirby pencils inked by Barry Windsor-Smith !

    JIMMY OLSEN by Kirby, Vol 1, reprinting issues 133-141, which is actually my favorite of Kirby's Fourth World series, the most fun, with a huge cast of characters, and a WOW-factor, constantly flooring the reader with new visuals and concepts.

    JIMMY OLSEN by Kirby, Vol 2, reprinting issues 142-148. I especially liked the "Transilvane" story in issues 142-143. All these covers from both volumes can be viewed at the top of this topic page.

    BLACK PANTHER, volume 1, reprinting issues 1-7 of Kirby's run on the series from 1977-1978

    KAMANDI 1-10 (DC Archive hardcover, released Oct 2005) Reprinting what is my all-time favorite of Kirby's work. Hopefully its success will result in three more volumes being produced in quick succession, allowing all 40 issues to be available in Hardcover format.

    FANTASTIC FOUR. Kirby did issues 1-102, the first 6 annuals, and one last fill-in, issue 108, all of which is available now in one format or another.
  • The FF Marvel Masterworks, collecting 10 issues per volume, reprinting up through issue 93, has reprinted almost the entire Kirby run in full color offset printing.
  • An FF omnibus special hardcover edition (out just two or three months ago) reprints all the Kirby issues in a bulky two-volume hardcover set.
  • And the ESSENTIAL FANTASTIC FOUR volumes offer a format to read these stories cheaply in black&white. I got the first volume, reprinting FF 1-20 and Annual 1, before I just had to have them in color hardcover volumes.

    THOR (Marvel Masterworks hardcovers) now reprint from issues 83-130, in four volumes so far. Although I'd rather wait until more are printed, so I can enjoy the complete run, or close to it, in this format. (Kirby did scattered issues from 83-96, and then a complete run from 97-177, and 179. THOR and FF are his longest running series)

    Greg Theakston, of Pure Imagination publishing, has been endeavoring to publish ALL of Kirby's work, beginning with Kirby's earliest in 1939, up through the Golden Age, late 40's and 50's era. Reprinting all of Kirby's illustration career, spanning more than 40,000 pages of comic art, spread over more than 50 years, a very ambitious project indeed.

    And most recent that I'm aware of, just out two weeks ago, the TALES TO ASTONISH 1-10 hardcover, first of a proposed line of hardcovers reprinting Kirby's pre-Marvel (1958-1963) monster stories, that slowly evolved into the Marvel Universe, weaving through those early years in JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, STRANGE TALES, TALES OF SUSPENSE, and TALES TO ASTONISH, as well as shorter runs in WORLD OF FANTASY, AMAZING ADVENTURES, AMAZING ADULT FANTASY, and one issue of AMAZING FANTASY.







The one I'm most excited about is the KAMANDI 1-10 hardcover.

Here's a map of Kamandi's world from issue 32, enhanced with some fun internet features:







--------------------

Wikipedia finally added a page for Paris Cullins:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Cullins

Apparently he left comics for work in advertising, animation and video games.

One of the holy grails of my Jack Kirby collection is the KIRBY UNLEASHED book that was released in 1971. When I was finally able to obtain a copy, it cost me $50.00, back in 1996.

Now, Two Morrows just re-released it in a new edition about a year ago, adding to it a fair amount of new material !



The Two Morrows publisher-site's description is more specific about the contents, and additional new material.

Even though I already have the original, I'd like the newer version for the additional material, and to have a lower-priced copy, so I don't beat up my original.

I posted the wraparound cover in an earlier post. Which ranks as one of the single best pages of Kirby's career.



I just about ejected in my shorts when I discovered this site:



New links:
https://marswillsendnomore.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/jack-kirbys-monsters-monsteroso/
and
https://marswillsendnomore.wordpress.com/tag/jack-kirby/

Complete scans of every "lost" Kirby monster story --every last page of every unreprinted story online-- from 1959-1963, and you can read each story online !

Most of these stories were reprinted in the 60's an 70's, and this list is all the ones that were never reprinted.

Almost all of these stories were inked by Dick Ayers (who is my favorite Kirby inker from this era. Except for a few stories inked by Chris Rule (mostly from 1959) and by Wood, Kleinman, Reinman and others.




So enjoy.

You'd normally have to pay at least 50 bucks for an archive of stories like this.


That looks like a great website Dave! I'll save some of those comics when I get time!
Quote:

Captain Sweden said:
That looks like a great website Dave! I'll save some of those comics when I get time!







 Quote:
Wonder Boy said:


Which has complete scans of every "lost" Kirby monster story --every last page of every unreprinted story online-- from 1959-1963, and you can read each story online !


 Quote:
Captain Sweden said:
That looks like a great website Dave! I'll save some of those comics when I get time!


 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:

<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/yeahthat.gif" alt="" />


It's great stuff, guys.

And about 200 pages of it !


My favorite Kirby stuff righht now is the pre-Marvel stuff, from 1958-1963.
Including Kirby's monster stories in the first 35 or so issues of TALES OF SUSPENSE( till Iron Man took over) and TALES TO ASTONISH(till Ant-Man took over) , JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY 51-83 (till Thor took over), and STRANGE TALES roughly 50-100 (before the Human Torch, Doctor Strange and Nick Fury took over).

Plus the more short-lived AMAZING ADVENTURES, AMAZING FANTASY, STRANGE WORLDS and WORLD OF FANTASY.


In addition to the monster stories, Kirby did a wide range of other types of stories: war, western and romance, which I have scattered issues of.
In titles like GUNSMOKE WESTERN, RAWHIDE KID, TWO-GUN KID, KID COLT OUTLAW, LOVE ROMANCES, TEEN-AGE ROMANCE, YOUNG ROMANCE, and BATTLE.


These are wonderful inventive stories, with great little twists of characterization, humor, irony and nobility.

I especially love the RAWHIDE KID stories Kirby did in this era. Like the monster stories, most are 5 pages, 7 pages, or 13 pages. And yet they have more plot than many 22-page stories today. And than any number of current 6-issue "story-arcs" for that matter.

I have a few original RAWHIDE KID issues, but most I have reprinted cheaply in the 70's title MIGHTY MARVEL WESTERN.

Ah, for the days of old, when we expected more and got it...



I hope Marvel will re-print Monster and SF comics by Lee, Kirby and Ditko (in colored trades). If not at least an anthology trade.
Wasn't Jack Kirby the one who created and drew CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN?
He created it. And he drew some of them. However, other writers and artists took over the series.
Thank you, G Man! Although I have not seen a CHALLENGERS issue since the mid sixties or so, I had a feeling....let's see, thier names were :

Ace

Prof

Red

Rocky

unless I am mistaken...I loved those issues! I forget the name of the artist who took over the artistic reigns, though it may have been Bob Brown..
I'm not a fan of the Challengers, but the Kirby art in the "Greatest Stories of the 50's Ever Told" HC is impressive. Way ahead of its time, even among the selection of stories in that book.
This link is relevant..It has Kirby artwork on a Challengers of the Unknown cover:

http://www.toonopedia.com/chalngrs.htm
 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:
Wasn't Jack Kirby the one who created and drew CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN?


 Quote:
the G-man said:
He created it. And he drew some of them. However, other writers and artists took over the series.


There's actually a big event in Kirby's life regarding his departure from CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN.

The Challengers first appeared in SHOWCASE issues:
6 (Feb 1957)
7 (April 1957)
11 (Dec 1957)
12 (Jan 1958)

After which Kirby drew the first 8 issues of CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN when they spun off into their own series. (May 1958-June 1959)

The reason Kirby left DC at this point is precisely this:

Kirby had been marketing several newspaper strips, to get out of the then-dying comics industry, and into a more lucrative syndicated newspaper strip. Among them Johnny Reb (a Civil War period series) and SKY MASTERS (about a group of space explorers. )
Of the strips Kirby had going, SKY MASTERS was particularly successful, and was growing in popularity.

But editor Jack Schiff at DC, who helped broker initial sale of the SKY MASTERS strip to a syndicate, had wanted a percentage of Kirby's royalties from the strip. When Schiff wasn't cut in, he pursued a lawsuit against Kirby.

I initially thought the lawsuit asserted that the SKY MASTERS strip was too similar to the DC-owned CHALLENGERS characters (that Kirby created !), i.e., that SKY MASTERS was a copyright infringement on the CHALLENGERS characters.

But it may have just been about Schiff wanting a settlement for the percentage he was shorted of.

Schiff won the lawsuit, after which according to alternate versions, Kirby either refused to work for DC from that point, or Schiff fired Kirby and no longer let Kirby get any work at DC.

In any case, Kirby quit working for DC in 1959, and (post-Comics Code, with limited publishers, many publishers recently driven out of business due to the Code) Kirby began working almost exclusively for Marvel.

Until Infantino welcomed Kirby back to DC in 1970.




Many have noted the similarity of CHALLENGERS to the later FANTASTIC FOUR series.

An interesting tribute to this is John Byrne's WHAT IF story (issue 36): "What if the FF had not gained their powers?"


Which essentially turns the FF into the Challengers of the Unknown.




Kirby did not work again for DC until the moment Jack Schiff retired from DC. At which point, in 1970, Kirby met with publisher Infantino and signed a contract with DC, and soon after was publishing his Fourth World series ( FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE and JIMMY OLSEN).


I read that FF What If issue when it first came out, and I noted the similarity to the Challengers back then.. also, the FF's original purple outfits, which they wore the very first issue - were the same purple outfits the Challengers started off with.


I first saw the Challengers by Kirby in this SUPER DC GIANT # 25, reprinting CHALLENGERS issues 4, 6, and 8, with a new Kirby cover (circa 1971) and a text article on Kirby.


I find it interesting to see how Kirby drew CHALLENGERS 1-8 in 1958-1959, vs. how he drew them on this new cover.

That cover appears to have been inked by Vince Colletta,
who also inked Kirby's work on Thor and The Fantastic Four, back around 1965 - 66.
 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:
That cover appears to have been inked by Vince Colletta,
who also inked Kirby's work on Thor and The Fantastic Four, back around 1965 - 66.


Yeah Beardguy, that cover is inked by Colletta.

As you say, Colletta inked almost the entire THOR run by Kirby, From about issue 110-177, and 179. Except for a few fill-in inks by Bill Everett and a few others. And it was on THOR that I grew to appreciate Colletta, especially on Kirby.



Colletta also inked almost all of Kirby's earliest 70's DC work, including Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run (issues 133-139, 141-145, and 148, to be precise). I own a page of original art from issue 148.
In addition, Colletta also inked FOREVER PEOPLE 1-5, NEW GODS 1-4, and MISTER MIRACLE 1-4, before Mike Royer was hired to replace him as Kirby's DC inker.
And SPIRIT WORLD # 1.
And DAYS OF THE MOB # 1.




The machinery border between the images on this SUPER DC GIANT CHALLENGERS cover is similar to the panel layout in the opening pages of MISTER MIRACLE # 2 (introducing Overlord as a character).

And also similar to a giant TV screen shown in FANTASTIC FOUR 62, a double-page spread on pages 2 and 3. This is one I enlarged and had framed, as part of the home-comic-art-museum that is my home. \:\)




Colletta inked only a few issues of FANTASTIC FOUR, but they were lavishly detailed, in issues 40-43, and FF ANNUAL 3 (the wedding of Reed and Sue Richards). At his peak, Colletta is one of the best.




Although at some point in the mid-60's Colletta began cutting corners, erasing backgrounds and filling over large areas of detail with black.
Colletta was perhaps the only inker Kirby requested not ink his work because of this. At least temporarily.
But I guess Colletta shaped up, because he not only began inking Kirby at Marvel again after Kirby had him removed, but he even followed as Kirby's inker in 1970-1971 when Kirby moved to DC.



Sinnott began his inking run on Kirby's FF with issue 44, and stayed as the regular FF inker until the end of Kirby's run with issue 102, and one last issue I don't have, issue 108.

Sinnott remained inker on FANTASTIC FOUR long after Kirby left the series in 1970, staying through John Buscema, Rich Buckler, George Perez, Keith Pollard, an early run by John Byrne, and Bill Sienkiewicz, finally departing as FF inker in 1981, when Byrne fully took over FF as writer/penciller/inker with issue 232. One of the longest runs of any inker on a series. He waxed nostalgic to his death about how much he loved inking Kirby's run, and what a thrill it was to open his mailed pages and see Kirby's new pencils each month, and adding his own contribution to Kirby's.
Maybe its me, but the more I read about Kirby it seems the more he comes off as a "perpetual victim," claiming that everyone ripped him off: Jack Schiff, Stan Lee, Carmine Infantino, etc. Every five or so years he'd decide whichever company he worked for was ripping him off, so he'd quit in a huff and go over to the other company.
I used to let it bother me that my "heroes" were less than perfect, G Man...I would not listen to this musician because he had had a drug problem, and would not read that writer because he was highly conservative... but, over the years, I have learned to seperate the person and his life from their body of work. Otherwise, you run the risk of not liking anyone creative or famous because they are flawed.
Joe Sinnott is my favorite inker on Jack's work, with Colletta a close second..now, does anyone here know how to pronounce "Sinnott"?

Is it Sin - not? Sin - no?

Thank you, Wonder Boy, for making this thread fun again!

Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
I used to let it bother me that my "heroes" were less than perfect, G Man...I have learned to seperate the person and his life from their body of work. Otherwise, you run the risk of not liking anyone creative or famous because they are flawed.




I have no intention of letting it affect my appreciation for Kirby's talent. I'm merely observing that Kirby seemed to keep bouncing back and forth between DC and Marvel every few years, each time claiming the other company had ripped him off.

There's that old saying "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me." It would seem to apply here.

Alternatively, you begin to wonder if, maybe, Kirby was a little quick to claim he was ripped off.
 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:
Joe Sinnott is my favorite inker on Jack's work, with Colletta a close second..now, does anyone here know how to pronounce "Sinnott"?

Is it Sin - not? Sin - no?

Thank you, Wonder Boy, for making this thread fun again!

\:\)


Well hey, it always was fun, it was just on hiatus for a long while !


I can't say for certain, but I've never heard anyone pronounce Sinnott's name in a way other than < sin- ott >

One of the toughest names in comics is that of Bill Sienkiewicz, which is pronounced <sin- kev- itch >

One I learned recently from an interview of the artist, Mike Mignola revealed the correct pronounciation of his name is < min- yo- la >.
But before and since I read the COMIC BOOK ARTIST interview, everyone I know pronounces it < mig- no- la >.



But back on the subject of Joe Sinnott, he is arguably the best inker ever on Kirby, and that is certainly the opinion of many.

Sinnott started out pretty inauspiciously, inking one lone issue of FF # 5, the story that first introduced Dr Doom, with time travel and pirates. But even after reading this story, I didn't know until later it was Sinnott, and it was pretty indistinguishable from the other early FF issues. It would be four years before Sinnot and Kirby would collaborate again, with much more satisfying results.

After 4 nice issues inked by Colletta (issues 40-43), Sinnott took over permanently as inker of FF.
And Sinnott, beginning with issue 44, and staying as the regular inker through Kirby's last issue (# 102), couldn't have started at a better time. Sinnott made a name for himself overnight when he took over inking FF, bringing Kirby's pencils to a new level of refinement.

And just in time, to be a part of what is arguably the greatest creative expansion of FF.
On Sinnott's watch, we saw introduction of Gorgon, Karnak, Medusa, Black Bolt, the Inhumans,, the hidden Inhumans city of Attilan in the Himalayas, the Silver Surfer, Galactus, "This Man, This Monster", the Black Panther and his jungle nation of Wakanda, a downright apocalyptic re-match with Dr Doom, the Negative Zone, Blastaar, Him (later called Warlock), the Microverse, and a re-match with Galactus every bit as mind-blowing as the first, the Kree, and their Sentry, awakened at his hidden island outpost on Earth. A re-match with Dr Doom in Latveria, witches, the Skrulls and a wild UFO ride, imprisonment by the skrulls in outer space, a clash with the Creature From The Black Lagoon, and several more down-to-earth single issue human dramas.

It was about 60 issues that, with Sinnott's inks, were truly "The World's Greatest Comics Magazine" as the cover proclaimed in the years they were published.

Sinnott stayed on FF as inker through Romita, Buscema, Buckler, Perez, Pollard, Byrne and Sienkiewicz, up until Byrne took over as writer-penciller-inker on FF in 1981 with issue 232.

So Sinnott certainly left his mark on FF, even long after Kirby left.

But for me, and I think most FF readers, Sinnott's inks over Kirby remain his best remembered.



--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."
 Quote:
the G-man said:
Maybe its me, but the more I read about Kirby it seems the more he comes off as a "perpetual victim," claiming that everyone ripped him off: Jack Schiff, Stan Lee, Carmine Infantino, etc. Every five or so years he'd decide whichever company he worked for was ripping him off, so he'd quit in a huff and go over to the other company.


I both agree and disagree with this notion.

I think Kirby did see himself as a victim to some extent.

I don't recall the precise details, but apparently Joe Simon may have been taking more than his financial share of the Simon & Kirby art-team revenues, and at least the perception of that resulted in the quiet dissolution of their partnership in 1955.

Kirby saw himself as a victim in the Jack Schiff thing, and what was no doubt a mutually hostile departure from DC in 1959.

Kirby saw himself as a victim in his 60's period at Marvel, where Stan Lee became rich on Kirby's contribution to developing Marvel's "Universe" of characters, while Kirby not only didn't share in that financial success, but also had characters he created taken away from him and developed in ways he didn't like.
I think this loss of creative control, more than money, was the reason he left and went to DC in 1970. Because at DC, Kirby wrote and edited in addition to pencilling what he created, and thus got full full creative control and credit for the characters he created.

But again, at DC, despite arguably good sales, for reasons that were never logically explained to Kirby, his most treasured series, NEW GODS and FOREVER PEOPLE, were cancelled out from under him.
And the remaining title, MISTER MIRACLE, was forced to change direction away from concluding the Fourth World storyline as well.

So again, Kirby saw himself as a victim, who was jerked around, and he probably would have left DC immediately if he could have in late 1972.
But because he had a contract with DC, he stayed until late 1975, and gave us KAMANDI, THE DEMON, OMAC, SANDMAN, and several other new series.



And at Marvel from 1975-1978, Kirby again felt mistreated and jerked around by his editors.

But to Kirby's credit, I think there is considerable evidence to support Kirby's perception of mistreatment at various publishers.
Many back Kirby's account that in the 60's he was plotting as well as drawing Marvel's titles, and that Lee was taking the credit for what Kirby created.
Steve Ditko left Marvel for virtually the same reasons: a lack of creative control, and a lack of credit for his plotting contribution.




Years after their cancellation in 1972, many have looked at the DC sales figures for FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS and MISTER MIRACLE and said they were good.
I offered my own conspiracy theory in the WTF topic, that the books were cancelled to prevent Kirby from killing off marketable characters that DC owned.





And there are many accounts to back up what Kirby said about his mistreatment at Marvel from 1975-1978.
One particularly scathing was Jim Starlin's account, in a COMIC BOOK ARTIST interview, of how editors would paste up Kirby's art pages on the wall with derisive remarks like: "the dumbest story ever told" and so forth.




And Kirby, when he didn't like the way he was treated, did leave and go somewhere else.

But I think the frustration for him through the 50's, 60's, and 70's was: Where else can you go ?!?
Once you've been fucked over by both Marvel and DC, and the other smaller publishers pay a fraction of what Marvel and DC do, where else can you go, except to leave the industry that you love?
Which is what Kirby finally did in 1978, when he left Marvel to do animation for cartoons.



In some of the cases, I think Kirby had legitimate complaints and limited options.

In other cases, it could have been oversensitivity and getting overly angry about the realities of working in the creative field, and a bit of "he said/she said" rather than actual mistreatment.

And in the cases of leaving Marvel and DC in the 1940's to pursue more lucrative work, and in the case of Jack Schiff who arguably just wanted compensation for brokering sale of the SKY MASTERS series, it could be argued that Kirby fucked over other people !



To some extent, it's in the eye of the beholder.

And like yourself, G-man, whatever happened behind the scenes, it doesn't interfere with my enjoyment of Kirby's work at Marvel, DC or any other publisher.
Here's a Kirby-focused Alan Moore interview from THE JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR # 30 :



The second half of the interview is, for me, the most interesting.

The interview begins with Moore reflecting on his first exposure to Kirby's work and its influence on Moore's own aesthetic sense and storytelling approach.

Later, Moore describes several tributes to Kirby in his own work, in the six-issue 1963 series, in SUPREME, and in
TOP 10.


I especially like Moore's described tribute to Kirby in the SUPREME series:

Quote:


TJKC: Could you tell me a little about the "New Jack City" story in Supreme [SUPREME: THE RETURN, issues 5 and 6] ?

ALAN MOORE: The basic story was that some sort of mysterious citadel seems to have appeared overnight somewhere in some high, inaccessible Tibetan mountain valley or whatever.
So Supreme goes to investigate and what he finds is this bewildering landscape which is in fact a great number of different landscapes sort of fused together. There's bits of it that look like a 1930s Depression era bowery slum, where he meets a kid gang and a costumed hero that the kid gang are obviously accomplices of. They have some battle with a suitably super-villain type. I believe we have a huge Atlas monster rising from the depths.

Supreme wanders down a tunnel to find himself coming out into a trench of a battlefield where there are lots of grizzled multi-ethnic soldiers: An obvious Irish one, an obvious Jewish one, an obvious Black guy, all very much like the Sgt. Fury line-up and a whole slew of patriotic heroes.

This carries on until Supreme actually meets the supreme creator of this world, who kind of turns out to be Jack Kirby.

This is very difficult to explain because it took a whole story to tell the story, but it's basically that this gigantic floating head changes from this kind of Kirby photo montage—the head is changing, it always looks like Jack Kirby drawn or both.
This gigantic entity explains to him that he used to be a flesh and blood artist but now he is entirely in the realm of ideas, which is much better because flesh and blood has its limitations because he can only do four or five pages a day tops, where now he exists purely in the world of ideas. The ideas can just flow out uninterrupted.
He talks about the very concept of a space where ideas are real, which is the kind of place to some degree all comic creators work in all their lives, but Jack Kirby maybe more than most.

So it's kind of an idea that being free of a physical body, this artist is then able to explore endless worlds of imagination and ideas.

Just bumping Mr. Kirby's topic on his birthday (actually about 3 hours after the fact, my time).

Jack Kirby would be 89 today.


A few weeks ago, a collected edition of his ETERNALS series was released (originally published 1976-1977). listing for book HERE

The first two issues have some of Kirby's nicest artwork, especially the double-page spreads in both issues.
Happy late birthday Jack Kirby!!!
Yeah, if Jack had to go, he at least left us with a lot to remember him by.
In the ART OF JACK KIRBY book, a nice retrospective of his career, it says
Kirby produced over 40,000 pages of comic art during his reign.

And plenty of other unpublished pages that have been unearthed over
the last 20 years !

Here's the Mile-High listing of Kirby's 19-issue ETERNALS series, showing all the
covers, and quite a few interior pages.





[This image from ETERNALS # 1, pages 2 and 3, April 1976.
I have this one enlarged, matted and framed in my home. ]


For some reason the two pages won't display side-by-side in my post here the way it used to. But if you click the "reply" or "quote" buttons below, and then hit the "preview my changes" button and scroll down, my post will display the two images side by side below in the quote-screen.

Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2006-08-30 3:14 AM
My GOD that's fan-FUCKING-tastic!!

Wish I could draw like that!
Yeah, great stuff.

Again, to be honest, I felt the first two issues were the best, and the art and story diminished (but only slightly) in the remaining issues of the series.
Clearly inspired by the Erich Von Daniken Chariots of the Gods books. And the whole UFO craze of the 70's.


My favorite of Kirby's work is actually his Fourth World series (from 1970-1972 mostly) in FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE and JIMMY OLSEN. At various points in time, each of the four series were my favorite.

Although not of the same prose level as, say, Alan Moore, these stories have great literary/symbolic elements, that leave vast room for expansion.
From which only a few writers and artists have had the dedication and talent to satisfyingly expand on Kirby's Fourth World vision ("The Great Darkness Saga" in LEGION 287-294 by Levitz and Giffen, for example).



But when Kirby left DC and came back to Marvel in 1976, and ETERNALS # 1 came out, Kirby showed that that his enormous storytelling power had not diminished in the move.
My fav Kirby era : Fantastic Four issues # 1 through #103.

His best work was from issues #37 or so to about #70.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 2:50 AM
I thought his opening post sounded familiar check this out http://www.marvel.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1645
He copied it from those guys!
Posted By: Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 2:54 AM
I remember that while reading this last year, I did think it seemed more like a conversation between two posters than an essay by one person.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 2:59 AM
He always talks about morals but I guess stealing isnt considered wrong by his ilk.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 2:59 AM
ilk i say.
Posted By: Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 3:08 AM


Maybe he stole the porn he posted at the Women's forum from some other website, too!
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 3:09 AM
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 4:33 AM
Agghhh..I'm blinded by all the colors - and the gayness!
Posted By: Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 4:34 AM
Well, I like Kirby art...
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 4:44 AM
its your life
Posted By: Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 4:51 AM
It's now or never.
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:06 AM
Return to sender, address unknown?
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:08 AM
Posted By: Beardguy57 Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:19 AM
Don't be cruel...
One of the things that made ETERNALS stand out was the inking by John Verpoorten,
who worked in Marvel's production department for many years, before he was
recruited to ink Kirby's ETERNALS.


[ ETERNALS 2, page 1]

I think Verpoorten's inks were especially good on Kirby.

Mike Royer's inks, which were great in 1972, got a little muddy in the late 70's.
Verpoorten has a cleaner inking style.

Verpoorten died of a heart attack in 1977 (I remember reading he was over
300 pounds! )and others inked the remaining issues of ETERNALS that Kirby
pencilled after. But the Verpoorten-inked pages are beautiful work that lives on.


[ETERNALS 2, pages 2 and 3 ]

I also like D.Bruce Berry's inks over Kirby at DC in 1974-1975, on
JUSTICE INC, O.M.A.C., KAMANDI, OUR FIGHTING FORCES and
FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL, plus a few other stories.
And on a few issues of CAPTAIN AMERICA when Kirby came back to Marvel
in 1976.


 Quote:
britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
I thought his opening post sounded familiar check this out
http://www.marvel.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1645
He copied it from those guys!


\:lol\:

Yeah, I stole it from August 31, 2006, then I went back in time three years,
and started this topic.

That's how I did it ! Retroactive plagiarism, all the way, baby !

The guys at the other linked topic, where you click-and-dragged posts
from this one to, must wonder what's going on.

Posted By: rex Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:22 AM
Quote:

Wonder Boy said:

[image][/image]


[image][/image]





You're supposed to put links between those tags. The pics don't just magically appear.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:23 AM
Quote:

Wonder Boy said:
One of the things that made ETERNALS stand out was the inking by John Verpoorten, who worked in Marvel's production department for many years, before he was recrutied to ink Kirby's ETERNALS.

[image][/image]

I think Verpoorten's inks were especially good on Kirby. Mike Royer's inks, which were great in 1972, got a little muddy in the late 70's, Verpoorten has a cleaner inking style.

Verpoorten died of a heart attack in 1977 (I remember reading he was over 300 pounds! )and others inked the remaining issues of ETERNALS that Kirby pencilled after. But the Verpoorten-inked pages are beautiful work that lives on.

[image][/image]

I also like D.Bruce Berry's inks over Kirby at DC in 1974-1975, on JUSTICE INC, O.M.A.C., KAMANDI, OUR FIGHTING FORCES and FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL, and a few other stories.
And on a few issues of CAPTAIN AMERICA when Kirby came back to Marvel in 1976.


Quote:

britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
I thought his opening post sounded familiar check this out http://www.marvel.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=1645
He copied it from those guys!






Yeah, stole it from August 31, 2006, then I went back in time three years, and started this topic.

That's how I did it ! Retroactive plagiarism, all the way, baby !

The guys at the other linked topic, where you click-and-dragged posts from this one to, must wonder what's going on.






the circle of lies continue.
Quote:

rex said:
Quote:

Wonder Boy said:

[image][/image]


[image][/image]





You're supposed to put links between those tags. The pics don't just magically appear.




I didn't want to lose what I wrote, so I posted, and added the links after.
Posted By: rex Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:28 AM
Because its so hard to open another browser window?
Posted By: Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:29 AM
You'll have to excuse WB, he's been under a lot of pressure lately.
Quote:

Im Not Mister Mxypltk said:
You'll have to excuse WB, he's been under a lot of pressure lately.




Not at all.

I usually draft my post, then add the art images after.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:39 AM
by draft post he means "lift the work of guys on another message board"
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: WONDER BOY : "PLAGERIST!" - 2006-09-03 5:48 AM
Quote:

britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
by draft post he means "lift the work of guys on another message board"




Exactly !

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to travel back in time a few years, so I can indulge in some more retroactive plagiarism !
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 5:51 AM
pirate away, just dont expect any respect from us. im glad jack kirby died of AIDS before he seen what a mockery of his work you made.
Quote:

britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
pirate away, just dont expect any respect from us. im glad jack kirby died of AIDS before he seen what a mockery of his work you made.



I thought the hooker stabbed Kirby before the AIDS could kill him.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: WONDER BOY IS A PLAGERIST! - 2006-09-03 9:33 AM
it wasnt a hooker, it was his black transvestite "friend"
 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:
My fav Kirby era : Fantastic Four issues # 1 through #103.

His best work was from issues #37 or so to about #70.


Yeah, Kirby's FANTASTIC FOUR run, aside from building the Marvel universe, showed a range of different work from Kirby, as his style evolved over 10 years on FF, arguably the 10 years of his career where his art style changed the most drastically.

For me it's a little inconsistent as a series, from FF 1-102, because the art style and storytelling changes so much over that 10 years. Although I still enjoy it.
From Kirby's 60's Marvel era, sometimes I prefer Kirby's FF run, sometimes I prefer his JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR run. Both are filled to bursting with creativity.

FF issues 1-20 (mostly inked by Dick Ayers) are more modest and slow-moving. The first 10 issues are more in the vein of pre-Marvel monster stories.
Issue 11 is the first I consider to have a modern Marvel feel to its 2 stories.



FF 21-27 are diminished, art-wise, because of "George Bell" (a k a, George Roussous) inks. Although his inking additions to Kirby's art helped evolve the Thing's rock-like appearance, an addition that was not continued in Chic Stone's inks, in the issues after Bell's. Although Colletta and Sinnott later continued the rock-like additions.



FF 28-38 inked by Chic Stone evolve a bit more toward the fully developed FF look. I especially like the intro of Diablo (issue 30), with the creepy but decorative statues outside the entrance to his castle.

Stone's inks were much slicker, and more modern looking, but look a bit dated, compared to what came after. (Stone also inked FF ANNUAL 2, adding his magic to the memorable "Origin of Dr Doom" story.)


FF 39 was inked by "Frank Ray" (a k a, Frank Giacoia) and this is some of the cleanest inking by Giacoia I've seen. And while it was interesting to see Giacoia ink one issue, I'm glad he was never the regular inker on the series. The later fill-in issues Giacoia did during Joe Sinnot's inking run were much more loose and caricatured than this issue.

Another interesting thing in this issue (since this issue guest-features Daredevil) all the Daredevil figures are inked by Wally Wood (DD's regular artist at the time), which is reminiscent of the later Murphy Anderson-inked heads in Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run (issues 135-148). I like when 2 inkers ink a book like this, and you can see the contrast between their 2 styles.



FF 40-43 were inked by Vince Colletta, who I think was in his inking prime, and turned in some nice pages on the series (and also inked FF ANNUAL 3, which presents the wedding of Reed and Sue Richards, attended by just about every character in the Marvel universe).



But both the cosmic level of storytelling, and the level of detail in Kirby's art, finally reached full fruition in FF 44, where Joe Sinnott began inking Kirby's pencils, giving us the half-speed, digitally mastered stereo-surround-sound
full-overdrive FF !



You draw the cut-off line for your favorite FF run at issue 70, Beardguy. And I think a lot of critics agree with you, that FF was slightly restrained in creativity after that, exploring already developed characters, revisiting new battles with Dr. Doom, Galactus, the Silver Surfer, Inhumans, etc.
But I actually enjoyed these later issues just as much.

But clearly, Kirby at this point ( FF 71-102, roughly 1967-1970) was holding back ideas, that would be fully realized in Kirby's Fourth World series (FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE and JIMMY OLSEN, from 1970-1974).

_________________________________________________________________


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."
I posted several images from a Lord of Light portfolio by Jack Kirby, back on page 1 of this topic.

Here's a link to the complete portfolio:






For my money, these are some of Kirby's most impressive pages. I've seen them described as both pre-production images for a movie based on Roger Zelazny's Lord of Light, and as Kirby concept drawings for a science fiction theme park.

Either way, it would have been wonderful to see these drawings fully realized in another form.
Those drawings of his are awesome! He is obviously influenced by Aztec and South and Central American art.
A bit of an African influence, as well.
Yeah, some of that Aztec influence came out later in the ETERNALS series Kirby did in 1976-1977. Those splash pages in ETERNALS 1 and 2 are just amazing.

I didn't pick up on the African influence till you mentioned it. Athough it's more obvious in Kirby's images of Wakanda, from the Black Panther intro in FANTASTIC FOUR 52 and 53.



Another artist with similar influences is Alcatena, an artist from Argentina, who first came to prominence inking Tim Truman on the 3-issue HAWKWORLD, and CONAN THE SAVAGE stories in the late 1980's.

I'd highly recommend looking up the MOVING FORTRESS and SUBTERRA trades (both published in the U.S. by Four Winds), that are a showcase for Alcatena's decorative statues, costumes and architecture. Although Alcatena's work, while partly Aztec influenced, seems much more far-eastern influenced.
From what I've read, Kirby was an artistic sponge, constantly soaking up inspiration from EVERYthing.
Kirby absorbed inspiration, and he also inspired others with his talent.
he also died fucking a horse.
You'll die eating Britney Spears' shorts.
no, you will.
Quote:

Wonder Boy said:
Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
My fav Kirby era : Fantastic Four issues # 1 through #103.

His best work was from issues #37 or so to about #70.




Yeah, Kirby's FANTASTIC FOUR run, aside from building the Marvel universe, showed a range of different work from Kirby, as his style evolved over 10 years on FF, arguably the 10 years of his career where his art style changed the most drastically.

For me it's a little inconsistent as a series, from FF 1-102, because the art style and storytelling changes so much over that 10 years. Although I still enjoy it.
From Kirby's 60's Marvel era, sometimes I prefer Kirby's FF run, sometimes I prefer his JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR run. Both are filled to bursting with creativity.

FF issues 1-20 (mostly inked by Dick Ayers) are more modest and slow-moving. The first 10 issues are more in the vein of pre-Marvel monster stories.
Issue 11 is the first I consider to have a modern Marvel feel to its 2 stories.



FF 21-27 are diminished, art-wise, because of "George Bell" (a k a, George Roussous) inks. Although his inking additions to Kirby's art helped evolve the Thing's rock-like appearance, an addition that was not continued in Chic Stone's inks, in the issues after Bell's. Although Colletta and Sinnott later continued the rock-like additions.



FF 28-38 inked by Chic Stone evolve a bit more toward the fully developed FF look. I especially like the intro of Diablo (issue 30), with the creepy but decorative statues outside the entrance to his castle.

Stone's inks were much slicker, and more modern looking, but look a bit dated, compared to what came after. (Stone also inked FF ANNUAL 2, adding his magic to the memorable "Origin of Dr Doom" story.)


FF 39 was inked by "Frank Ray" (a k a, Frank Giacoia) and this is some of the cleanest inking by Giacoia I've seen. And while it was interesting to see Giacoia ink one issue, I'm glad he was never the regular inker on the series. The later fill-in issues Giacoia did during Joe Sinnot's inking run were much more loose and caricatured than this issue.

Another interesting thing in this issue (since this issue guest-features Daredevil) all the Daredevil figures are inked by Wally Wood (DD's regular artist at the time), which is reminiscent of the later Murphy Anderson-inked heads in Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run (issues 135-148). I like when 2 inkers ink a book like this, and you can see the contrast between their 2 styles.



FF 40-43 were inked by Vince Colletta, who I think was in his inking prime, and turned in some nice pages on the series (and also inked FF ANNUAL 3, which presents the wedding of Reed and Sue Richards, attended by just about every character in the Marvel universe).



But both the cosmic level of storytelling, and the level of detail in Kirby's art, finally reached full fruition in FF 44, where Joe Sinnott began inking Kirby's pencils, giving us the half-speed, digitally mastered stereo-surround-sound
full-overdrive FF !



You draw the cut-off line for your favorite FF run at issue 70, Beardguy. And I think a lot of critics agree with you, that FF was slightly restrained in creativity after that, exploring already developed characters, revisiting new battles with Dr. Doom, Galactus, the Silver Surfer, Inhumans, etc.
But I actually enjoyed these later issues just as much.

But clearly, Kirby at this point ( FF 71-102, roughly 1967-1970) was holding back ideas, that would be fully realized in Kirby's Fourth World series (FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE and JIMMY OLSEN, from 1970-1974).

_________________________________________________________________


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."





You blew the right note on that one, Dave! The FF's stories worked their way towards ACTUALLY being The World's Greatest Comic Magazine, as it said on the covers by about issue #39... and hit an all time high with the Inhumans - Galactus stories! Things went slowly downhill after that, with Johnny's whining, ( " Wahh! I miss Crystal!" ) Ben's " I'm a hideous monster! No one loves me!" ) Reeds' coldness to Sue ( In reality, Sue would have either left him and sued for a hefty alimony due to Reed's patents on all his inventions, or went off and had an affair with Daredevil!), and Sue's " I don't know how much longer my force field will last!" due to a fight with Galactus/The Hulk/ Blastaar whoever.

Then again, we all kinda expected those cliches, as they were part and parcel of the Silver Age. ( You commented yourself that my writing is very Silver Age.. and it is! This is where I was strongly influenced from.. The 1960's FF, Spiderman, Thor, Superman, Legion, JLA, and Avengers stories.

I was aware even as a kid about the differences each inker contributed to Jack's art.. I'm an artist, myself... and I agree - Joe Sinnott was the BEST inker for Jack's pencils!
Quote:

Beardguy57 said:

You blew the right note on that one, Dave!





I knew it! DTWB is fuckin beardguy!
Not likely, as I am attracted to big, burly, tall black men who are my age or older, or who are very close to my age.
sure beardguy surrrre.....
Well, my young sceptic......I could post pics here of me with some big black guys I have had relations with, but that is not my style.


I listed this previously in the comic series that never happened topic, but felt it relative to mention here in the Kirby topic, about Kirby's adaptation of THE PRISONER tv series into comic book form in 1978, that was completed but never published.

SPIRIT WORLD # 1 and DAYS OF THE MOB # 1 were published in 1971. The second issues were cancelled and went unpublished, and the material for these two magazines were partly published elsewhere in the issues I listed in the other topic.


 Quote:
Wonder Boy said:
 Quote:

----------------------------------------------
erdmann
posted August 01, 2002 01:11 PM
---------------------------------------------


In 1971, DC toyed with the idea of launching a line of glossy magazines. Among them were three Kirby titles "In the Days of the Mob," "True Divorce Cases" and a romance comic aimed at black readers.
Only one issue of "Mob" was published. For more information on the book, check out: http://twomorrows.com/16mob.html
Also under consideration was a magazine-format "House of Mystery" and a pulp-style "Batman."


In addition to DAYS OF THE MOB # 1, the other Kirby magazine released was SPIRIT WORLD # 1. At the bottom of page 1 of this topic, I detailed what happened to the stories produced for the second issue of each of these two titles.

As well as the unpublished SOUL LOVE romance magazine Kirby produced, which have only been partly published in the JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR fanzine, and the MASTERWORKS book I mentioned that has a sampling of unpublished Kirby pages, with a text restrospective of kirby's career up to 1978.

 Quote:

And speaking of Kirby, he once worked on a "Prisoner" comic for Marvel after Steve Englehart and Gil Kane were bounced from the project. See: http://twomorrows.com/11prisoner.html


Kirby's 17-page THE PRISONER story (like the cancelled titles from the 1978 DC Implosion that were collected into a very limited 35 collected xeroxed copies and distributed as CANCELLED COMICS CAVALCADE vols 1 and 2, now widely bootlegged) is also available as a set of unauthorized xeroxes, that I've seen occasionally offered on e-bay and elsewhere.

Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
Well, my young sceptic......I could post pics here of me with some big black guys I have had relations with, but that is not my style.








dave's not black! caught you in a lie!



 Quote:
britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
 Quote:
Beardguy57 said:

You blew the right note on that one, Dave!



I knew it! DTWB is fuckin beardguy!





Must you project your homosexual fantasies onto others?

Just because you're all hot for man-meat doesn't mean everyone else is.

Get the man love you need, BSAMS.


Quote:

Wonder Boy said:


Get the man love you need, BSAMS.






while im flattered, i dont swing that way, maybe JJ will take you up on the offer!
What are you trying to imply by posting an image of a face stained by a white substance in this thread?
It looks more to me like Mopius was eating Bleach again!
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2006-12-28 8:33 PM
Looking to replace some expired links, I found...

THIS

...giving many scanned pages from the compiled JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR trade of issues 10-12, along with a lot of Kirby original art. And especially nice, several versions of a Fighting American cover pencils by Kirby, before the later inked version by Simonson, plus versions that are black-and-white, color and reproduced from pencils. Plus Kirby pages, some unpublished, from STRANGE TALES (Nick Fury), ETERNALS, and THE PRISONER, among others.

Plus a tour of Kirby's home, with some photos of Kirby as well.
Also, something mind-blowing from Wikipedia's listing for Zelazny's Lord of Light, describing Kirby's work on the project :

  • FILM VERSION

    In 1979 it was announced that Lord of Light would be made into a 50 million dollar film. It was planned that the sets for the movie would be made permanent and become the core of a science fiction theme park to be built near Denver, Colorado. Famed comic-book artist Jack Kirby was even contracted to produce artwork for set design. However, due to legal problems the project was never completed.

    Parts of the unmade film project, the script and Kirby's set designs, were subsequently acquired by the CIA as cover for an exfiltration team posing as Hollywood location scouts in Tehran in order to rescue six US diplomatic staff who escaped the Iranian hostage crisis by virtue of being outside the Embassy building at the time.
    [ CIA article on the covert operation ]



https://boingboing.net/2012/10/16/how-roger-zelaznys-lord-of-l.html


I'm currently reading Fantastic Four Essential Book # 4. I had meant to but FF Masterworks books 7 thru 10, but I put it off, and now, I saw where it would be prohibitively expensive to buy those books! I shouldn't have waited!

But I did buy FF Essentials #4 and 5, and am currently enjoying the hell out of book #4! I'm about to start on FF issue # 68.

Kirby was way ahead of his time! His artwork, characters,
machines, contributions to storylines, and vehicles were as fresh and exciting and new in 1966 as Star Wars was in the summer of 1977!

This was the 1960's we're talking about... only a decade or so after the first truly visionary sci - fi movie had been released in theaters : " The Day The Earth Stood Still. "

Jack's art and Stan's stories seemed to pick up on that story telling style and advance it greatly forward.

The 60's were a wonderful era for comics! It was a creative explosion - the likes of which we're highly unlikely to ever see again.

And if anyone knows where I can get those four FF Masterworks books for a reasonable price, please do let me know!

Yeah, Beardguy, they finally finished reprinting the last 4 volumes of the Lee/Kirby/Sinnott run, so Kirby's entire run from issues 1-102 are now available in hardcover.
(I have issues 1-60 in hardcover, and have some hardcover buying to do as well)


In addition, there's also an omnibus 2-volume hardcover set that collects the entire Lee/Kirby FF run in two unruly and huge hardcover volumes. (I'm not really interested in this version, but others might be.)



I'm even more excited about the KAMANDI vol 2 hardcover just out, reprinting issues 11-20 of Kirby's 40-issue run. KAMANDI, as I've said often, is one of my all-time favorite series.

One reason I haven't purchased these sooner is I have most of these issues in their original form. But it's great to see the widescreen digitally-remastered versions.

Although sometimes (such as with the heavily redrawn Neal Adams, BATMAN, DEADMAN, and GREEN LANTERN/GREEN ARROW hardcovers) a new printing and altered art and coloring can be disappointing.

But the Kirby FF stuff looks exceptional, enhanced by faithful coloring and better printing, and on glossy paper. And I think you often get more for your money with the Marvel Masterworks volumes.

Thanks, Dave! I just might get those last 4 FF Masterworks books now!

I saw book #7 on Amazon, and they wanted $248.00 for it!
Nice of them to reprint Kamandi, like that story a lot. Have it in an anthology title of translated US comics. I should read all those issues.
I am continuing the '' Jack Kirby is a Shitty artist. " thread in here.

I'm NOT going to buy FF Masterworks books 7,8,9, & 10.

After reading the Essential books, which reprinted FF issues 64 thru 110, I remembered how both story and art quality had gone downhill during that period.... having the Essentials is good enough.

The best era for the FF ended with the Galactus saga, the first one. After that, it was a slow decline. I feel that it was also due to the decay of the relationship between Jack Kirby and Stan Lee.
Why continue a thread about Kirby being shitty in a thread about him being great and more or less re-posting comments you made in the previously mentioned thread?Now if the other thread was locked & you couldn't post in it,I'd understand but this doesn't make sense to me at all......not that most of what you post does but I was just wondering.
Quote:

allan1 said:
Why continue a thread about Kirby being shitty in a thread about him being great and more or less re-posting comments you made in the previously mentioned thread?Now if the other thread was locked & you couldn't post in it,I'd understand but this doesn't make sense to me at all......not that most of what you post does but I was just wondering.




At this point, both threads have become interchangable; there are those who posted in here how much they hate Jack, and some who've posted his praises in here, too.

Same goes for the " Shitty Kirby " thread, LoL!
I can see where Beardguy views them as interchangeable.

While this topic's been mostly pure appreciation and nostalgia for Kirby's work, a few have said here in this topic they don't like or see what the big deal is about Kirby. And that's fine, not everyone has to like his work.

But the focus of the other topic...



...has been, to paraphrase in less vulgar language: "Is Kirby really that great? Is he worthy of his 'King of comics' reputation?" Which I answered with the rest.



So I do see a distinction between the two topics.

This one is more for reflecting back on personal favorites of Kirby's work, and new editions that keep his legacy alive, and portfolio work by Kirby, and discussing tributes by other artists, such as the Levitz/Giffen darkness saga in LEGION, or Simonson's ORION series, or new Marvel Masterworks editions. Or discussing nostalgically the various eras of Kirby's career, and enthusiastically remembering one's favorite work by Kirby, or other aspects of his career, personal life, its impact on his work, and anecdotes about Kirby or having met him.

The other topic by Karl Hungus (or Ray Adler) is about what makes someone worthy of being called the field's greatest artist, and whether Kirby fits the criteria to be called that. Which is more about contrasting Kirby with other artists, in the greater context of comics history. It's a bit less reverent, and a bit more critical of Kirby's work.

Both topics have their individual merits, and a degree of crossover.

But I like the two being separate.
Quote:

Beardguy57 said:
Quote:

allan1 said:
Why continue a thread about Kirby being shitty in a thread about him being great and more or less re-posting comments you made in the previously mentioned thread?Now if the other thread was locked & you couldn't post in it,I'd understand but this doesn't make sense to me at all......not that most of what you post does but I was just wondering.




At this point, both threads have become interchangable; there are those who posted in here how much they hate Jack, and some who've posted his praises in here, too.

Same goes for the " Shitty Kirby " thread, LoL!




So in other words,you like to go both ways.
no. he's srticly male ass cracks.
Bit like Kirby then!
Until Galactus sodomized him and made him his bitch.All dowhill from there.
Say what you will about his art,but the man knew his tiaras.

I just heard yesterday about a new Kirby hardcover:


Except for KAMANDI (of which the first 20 issues are also out in hardcover, vols 1 and 2 so far), Kirby's Fourth World series is my favorite.
And Kirby's Fourth World is unquestionably his most ambitious.

Certainly worthy of, and long overdue for, collection in a hardcover edition.

Although it seems dumb to me to release them individually across 4 volumes, each only a part of the whole. It would be more logical to make them a boxed set, complete.
kirby sucks balls
Quote:

Nowhereman said:





Quote:

allan1 said:
Say what you will about his art,but the man knew his tiaras.




Quote:

rex said:
Kirby sucks balls.




Well, at this point I'd say Kirby's been treated the same here as anyone else.

He's now officially a Nature Boy.
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2009-05-11 9:43 PM
Wonder Boy content User a man's signature quote is inversely proportionate to his cock size
4000+ posts 1 minute 35 seconds ago Reading a post
Forum: Comic Books
Thread: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King...
Holden McGroin innocent User master of the red x
3000+ posts 4 minutes 28 seconds ago Logging out
Posted By: Irwin Schwab Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2009-05-11 9:44 PM
couldn't figure our what ID to toss off to Kirby with?
 Originally Posted By: rex
kirby sucks balls
Wow, you guys are so obsessed with my posts that you followed me into the comics forum to attack me. In this case, a topic I didn't even post to, just LOOKED at.

You're totally gay over anything I post.

It's embarassing, that my posts have become such an integral part of your lives.
Gay!
 Originally Posted By: Nöwheremän
Gay!


See ?
KIRBY FUCKER!
 Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy
 Originally Posted By: Nöwheremän
Gay!


See ?

Yes, I see a gay!
Everytime you post in fact!
 Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy
 Originally Posted By: Nowhereman


He looks so fetching in that tiara.
I would certainly tap that corpse!
Kirby tiara obsessor !!
Says the guy who's obsessed with cock.
 Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy
Kirby tiara obsessor !!

Yep, you certainly are.
his dream is to see a jack kirby animated cock.
Bravo! Bravo!
Wonderful, just wonderful!!!
How would you know? You're not even facing the screen.
\:\( Why did you have to tell me? I was having such a good time.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2010-02-23 10:56 PM

I was looking for Kirby original art, and I stumbled on this page, in tribute to Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN run:

https://ifanboy.com/articles/top-5-awesome-things-about-jack-kirbys-jimmy-olsen-comics/



This is my favorite run of Kirby's, at least of his Fourth World books, for a number of reasons. I think it was the most interesting version of SUPERMAN at the time, even superior to Dennis O'Neil's efforts (although O'Neil's SUPERMAN 233 --also reprinted recently as a Millenium Edition-- got off to a good start, but was less satisfying in the issues after.)

I loved the huge ensemble cast in Kirby's 15-issue JIMMY OLSEN run.
And the offbeat humor.
And the explosion of new worlds and new characters introduced.
And The Project genetic research facility.
And the Anderson-inked heads of Superman and Jimmy Olsen, that contrasted the Colletta background inks in an interesting way, but also gave visual continuity with the other Swan/Anderson-illustrated SUPERMAN and ACTION titles, despite their vastly different storylines.


The double-page Transilvane image is from issue 143, the second of a two-part story, which introduced Dabney Donavan, and his creation: a Creature-Feature-culture planet, Bloodmoor, nestled in the crypt of a cemetary. Great Halloween reading, and as exciting as any other issue of Kirby's OLSEN run.

Glad I'm not the only one who savors these issues.

L'Officier and Ladronn did a great sequel to this in a two-part LEGENDS OF THE DC UNIVERSE 22 and 23 story in 2000.

https://www.hollywoodcomics.com/transilv.htm


Currently reading the TPB re-prints of his Jimmy Olsen run, and have recently finished the first Masterworks volume of The Mighty Thor.
Posted By: rex Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2011-04-28 7:57 PM
jack kirby sucks.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2011-04-30 7:41 AM
 Originally Posted By: Captain Sweden
Currently reading the TPB re-prints of his Jimmy Olsen run, and have recently finished the first Masterworks volume of The Mighty Thor.


Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN series remains among my favorites, and it's great to read them in these two collected volumes.



I already have all the Kirby JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR issues, so I don't have an urgency to pick up the Masterworks volumes of it. I always plannned to do that at some point after the complete Kirby run is all in hardcover, so that buying in hardcovers allows one to read the whole series in that format.

Marvel in the last few years has also reprinted Kirby's complete 1976-1978 runs of ETERNALS, CAPTAIN AMERICA, and BLACK PANTHER, in inexpensive full-color trade paperback.
There's an ETERNALS omnibus hardcover as well.
And DEVIL DINOSAUR hardcover.
Only the 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY Treasury Edition and series 1-10 are not reprinted. And MACHINE MAN 1-9.

Some of the Masterworks reprints I've been most eager to see have been of the early issues of TALES TO ASTONISH (3 volumes so far, issues 1-30), TALES OF SUSPENSE (2 volumes so far, issues 1-20).
And JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY that started with material from the early 50's and hasn't gotten to the Kirby/Ditko stuff yet that began with issue 51.

AMAZING ADVENTURES/AMAZING FANTASY also was released in an AMAZING FANTASY omnibus hardcover.

And I guess they'll eventually get to Kirby's STRANGE TALES stories as well.
All these (AMAZING ADVENTURES/AMAZING FANTASY, JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY, STRANGE TALES, TALES OF SUSPENSE, TALES TO ASTONISH) are Kirby's pre-Marvel monster story reprints, originally published from 1959-1963.

Kirby's RAWHIDE KID stories from the same pre-Marvel era have also been re-released in two RAWHIDE KID Masterworks editions. I've seen only the first volume.


Posted By: rex Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2011-04-30 7:44 AM
Kack Kirby was a communist!
Posted By: rex Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2011-04-30 7:44 AM
glen beck told me so.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2011-04-30 9:51 AM
DEVIL DINOSAUR was also released in a collected hardcover in 2007.

In addition to Marvel's other late-70's Kirby material already in book form:

ETERNALS hardcover (also released in 2 trades)
CAPTAIN AMERICA 193-214, ANNUAL 3 and 4, and BICENTENNIAL BATTLES treasury (reprinted in a series of 3 trades)
and
BLACK PANTHER 1-9 (in 2 trade volumes)

So the only material from Kirby's 1976-1978 return to Marvel not collected in book form are his 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY treasury-size movie adaptation, his 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY 10-issue series, MACHINE MAN 1-9, a few scattered covers, and a single-issue story he did in WHAT IF 11.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2013-06-15 6:38 PM
On the DC side, Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN, FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE, THE DEMON, KAMANDI, O.M.A.C., OUR FIGHTING FORCES 151-162 (THE LOSERS), SPIRIT WORLD, DAYS OF THE MOB, FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL 1, 5 and 6, SANDMAN, KOBRA 1, and RICHARD DRAGON 3 are all now in book form.

Virtually everything from Kirby's 1970-1975 DC canon of work.
With the single exception of JUSTICE INC, which may have been excluded for character copyright reasons.
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2013-06-15 7:41 PM
I killed Jack Kirby for being a shitty artist.
Did you strangle him with his own Jack Kirby pajamas?
Posted By: Nöwheremän Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2013-06-17 1:08 AM
Its how Dave Cockrum would have wanted it.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2014-01-11 9:55 AM
 Originally Posted By: The Youtube Video Poster

Jack Kirby draws - 17 March 1983 (The Jack Kirby Museum)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6hX21EYFyY



Nice find.
To see the artist himself preserved on video, and see his work habits as he draws.




This is pretty cool: A set of rejected Kirby covers from his DC years (1970-1975).

http://www.dialbforblog.com/archives/558/


I guess they'd originally considered introducing the New Gods in a SHOWCASE issue.

The others, such as the two of the three rejected JIMMY OLSEN covers, were later used in reprint editions. They were previously reprinted in other books, such as the JACK KIRBY:MASTERWORKS book (1978).

Although this set of unused Kirby DC covers is not complete. There's also one (not included in this article) for a proposed DC Limited Collectors' Edition tabloid giant that would have concluded the Orion vs. Darkseid "Final Battle" of the New Gods.

https://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/dynamics/2012/07/01/6408/



Which was finally done by Kirby in a vastly different form in the 1985 graphic novel HUNGER DOGS. Which for my money is the absolute worst thing Kirby has ever done. Would that Kirby could have concluded the series in 1972, while still in his prime.

There are several complete stories by Kirby from that period that went unpublished, such as two complete issues of DINGBATS OF DANGER STREET (intended to continue after FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL 6) that probably have covers as well.
And "The Seal-Men's war on Santa Claus", that would have been SANDMAN 7, and also was slated for KAMANDI 61 (which was cancelled in the DC Implosion in 1978 with issue 59), but only was published as Xeroxes in CANCELLED COMICS CAVALCADE.
In the mid 1980's it finally saw print in color in a BEST OF DC digest 22 (March 1982).
And Just a few months ago in JACK KIRBY OMNIBUS VOLUME 2.


Here's also a collection of all Kirby's DC house ads (along with a few playful photoshops at the end.)
http://www.dialbforblog.com/archives/557



Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2014-11-22 12:59 AM



http://secretsun.blogspot.com/2009/03/astrognostic-jacob-wrestles-angels.html

 Quote:
As uncomfortable as it is for some of his fans and friends to admit, Jack Kirby was a true believer in AAT and intervention theory. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AAT = Ancient Astronauts Theory]
The scope of his comics work from the early 70s to his retirement is unequivocal in this regard - the man was obsessed with gods from space.

So why is this important? Why do the beliefs of some old cartoonist who's been dead for 15 years matter now? Well, Kirby is one of the primary architects of popular culture today. Kirby's influence on comics is inarguable -- as it is on superhero culture in general.

But so is his influence on Hollywood. James Cameron, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas (particularly), Frank Miller, Quentin Tarantino and any other sci-fi mogul you can name today fed at Kirby's rich trough as kids. In fact, the quick cut/high intensity of action movies today comes directly from Kirby's Marvel work like The Fantastic Four. I see Kirby's influence all over video game design as well. You simply have to go back and look at pop culture before the Marvel Age and after, and the centrality of Kirby's imagination in the recreation of visual storytelling becomes clear as crystal.

And if Kirby is part of the essential DNA of pop culture, so then are his beliefs. You need look no further than Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull to see it- the entire tableau was simply a big budget replay of the first issue of The Eternals.

Remember- Spielberg and Lucas are the two of the most powerful men in Hollywood today, certainly from a creative standpoint. Even beyond the films they make themselves they have their fingers in countless pies through their production and technical interests.

More importantly, we have very strange indications of Jack Kirby's precognitive/psychic abilities, specifically in regards to events central to the Synchromystic worldview...


This is a blog that argues Kirby was a true believer in the notion that humans were seeded on earth by aliens, in a "Chariots of the Gods" mindset. While Kirby certainly used that as a basis for many of his stories, exploiting a popular trend in the 1970's era, I don't buy that Kirby was ascribed to that belief. Any more than he was to elements in the post-apocalyptic world of KAMANDI, or the magic in his portrayal of THE DEMON.

This blog also presents the idea that Kirby is influential on global popular culture and Hollywood films, way beyond just the comics world, that many (if not most) of the most influential Hollywood directors grew up reading Kirby comics of the 1960's-1970's. While it's interesting that many of them did read Kirby's stories (and in Lucas' case he may or may not have swiped the Luke Skywalker/Darth Vader relationship from Kirby's Orion/Darkseid relationship) as much as I love Kirby, I'm not really buying the above argument.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2014-11-30 9:42 AM

 Originally Posted By: Pig Iran
Kirby is solely responsible for making me love comics.
I was about 6 at the time I read Marvel Treasury #11..the Fantastic Four. "This Man, This Monster" made me realize the power comics had....even at that young age. I didn't fully understand the story, but I did get the redemption and sacrifice angles, and that a hero comes from the unlikeliest of places.

Nowhereman, check out Kirby's 1970's Black Panther run. If you don't like that you may never like Kirby.



Yeah, "This Man, This Monster" from FANTASTIC FOUR 51 is pretty widely agreed on as the single best issue of the series, an outstanding story by Stan Lee, and among the best issues by Kirby as well. If not the single best work by both. It came on the end of a wave of creativity that gave us the Inhumans and Attalan (FF 44-47), the Silver Surfer and Galactus (FF 48-50), then this great one-shot issue, then the Black Panther and Wakanda (FF 52-53), then a riproaring battle between the Thing and the Surfer in FF 55, then an epic battle between the FF and Dr. Doom (FF 56-60), then Blastar and the Negative Zone (FF 61-63), the Kree Sentinel (FF 64-65), then "Him" who later reached new heights in Starlin's WARLOCK series (FF 66-67).

Anyone who reads these and still tries to argue that Kirby is a talentless hack... these issues are the ones that defined Marvel!

In 1989, one day after work I went by Tropic Comics in Fort Lauderdale, and they had just purchased the originals of Kirby's FF 51 pages. What a treat that was, to see the original title page for "This Man, This Monster". They had already negotiated to sell that single page alone to a guy for $6,000 !

It makes my head spin to imagine what that page must be worth now, at a time when copies of ACTION COMICS # 1, and DETECTIVE 27 now sell for well upwards of $1 million each. I was talking to a local comics shop dealer a week ago, that I thought there would be a ceiling reached on what these originals would sell for. He said he thought so too. But we were both wrong, there's no limit in sight.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2015-08-26 7:33 AM

Kirby's birthday is August 28, 1917. If still alive, he'd now be 98 years old.

Stan Lee's up there too, still alive and kicking at 92!
And still very active too, in new projects and attending conventions.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-06-25 9:43 PM
Some recent purchases of mine include the hardcover reprints (both out in 2013) of DAYS IN THE MOB and SPIRIT WORLD magazines by Kirby.

Both were published in magazine form in August 1971. Both had a single issue published. Both had a complete 2nd issue produced by Kirby. But in both cases the second issue was never published.

In the case of SPIRIT WORLD 2, the 50 pages of stories and articles were published in color in DC's mystery titles in 1972, in WEIRD MYSTERY 1, 2 and 3, and in FORBIDDEN TALES OF DARK MANSION 6.

In the case of DAYS IN THE MOB 2, until this book came out, only 10 pages were published (in AMAZING WORLD OF DC COMICS 1), and virtually all appears in print for the first time.

I also picked up the STRANGE WORLD OF YOUR DREAMS hardcover of Simon and Kirby work from 1951-1953, which although less fluid in its storytelling has nice S & K art, and is similar in theme to SPIRIT WORLD, with a pseudo-scientist host character telling stories of supernatural visions in dreams, and interpreting the symbolism in the dreams, what they manifest in the psychology of the dreamer. The covers in particular for this series are very striking. The stories (as in the EC comics tradition) are text-heavy and a bit dry for those used to current storytelling.


I love DAYS IN THE MOB, which although ostensibly about mobsters of the 1920's and 1930's, also has a supernatural element to it. The host character is "Warden Fry" in a special wing of Hell reserved for gangland felons. And framed in circles of flames, he introduces the characters of each story, and tells their murderous exploits that sent them each to Hell. Wild stuff!

Virtually Kirby's entire 1970's DC output is out in hardcover or paperback, some of them in multiple editions. JIMMY OLSEN, FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE, DAYS OF THE MOB, SPIRIT WORLD, THE DEMON, KAMANDI, OMAC, THE LOSERS, RICHARD DRAGON 3, FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL 1, 5 and 6, SANDMAN. For some reason, only Kirby's JUSTICE INC 2-4 were not reprinted.

Likewise, virtually all of Kirby's 1976-1978 work for Marvel has been reprinted: CAPTAIN AMERICA 193-216 (plus CAPT AMERICA Treasuries and annuals stories), ETERNALS, BLACK PANTHER, MACHINE MAN and DEVIL DINOSAUR. (Only Kirby's 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY treasury movie adaptation, and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY 1-10 have not been reprinted.)

And of course, Kirby's entire 1960's Marvel output is available in MARVEL MASTERWORKS hardcovers and inexpensive trade editions, most in countless reprintings over the last 20 years.




Some others I love and completed my run of are the pre-Marvel "Atlas-era" MARVEL MASTERWORKS reprints TALES TO ASTONISH volumes 1-3, and TALES OF SUSPENSE 1-3.

They also published AMAZING ADVENTURES 1-6/AMAZING ADULT FANTASY 7-14/ AMAZING FANTASY 15 in a single omnibus hardcover, that I have't purchased yet. Except for the first 6 issues by Kirby, that pre-Marvel title is mostly a Steve Ditko tour-de-force.

Frustratingly, Kirby's other pre-Marvel "Atlas Era" monster stories in JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY and STRANGE TALES have not been reprinted yet. Those two series began in the early 1950's and ran about 60 issues before Kirby and Ditko began working in them, and they began with these early pre-Kirby stories, and will have to get up to around volume 6 of each before Kirby material will be reprinted.

Kirby's RAWHIDE KID as well is out in MASTERWORKS editions (2 volumes).

The only stuff not reprinted from that 1958-1963 period by Kirby are his war and romance stories from Marvel. And given the narrow audience for these, though just as good as his other work from what I've sampled, those may be a long time coming.

And needless to say, Kirby's Golden Age material on CAPTAIN AMERICA, SANDMAN, NEWSBOY LEGION, and BOY COMMANDOS are also available in hardcover editions. MANHUNTER for some reason is not.

The era of Kirby's work (and other comics of the same era) that is an exciting era to explore for me is the work of the late 1940's and early/mid 1950's, because they are the least written-about and least reprinted, and arguably the most forgotten. But as I said, many of those are also available now in new hardcover editions, such as the aforementioned STRANGE WORLD OF YOUR DREAMS, BOYS RANCH, and FIGHTING AMERICAN.
From this early era, Greg Theakston with his company Pure Imagination has made an effort to publish every Kirby story from his earliest work in inexpensive black-and-white phone-book type editions, in his series THE COMPLETE JACK KIRBY. So much that was not available in nicer editions is at least available through him in this format.

I also completed my run of Gilberton's WORLD AROUND US series (from 1958-1961), all 36 issues. Kirby did roughly 10 to 20 pages each in issues 31-36. Kirby describes in interviews that it was unpleasant work for him, and smothering the level of editorial control over the stories he did for them. But still interesting to see this very different period-history work from Kirby, on Native Americans, European explorers, and so forth. These issues also have nice work by Sam Glanzman, Gerald McCann, Gray Morrow, and other forgotten talents of that era.

Likewise, I've purchased many other Golden-Age and Pre-Code runs, some in book form, some scanned and distributed inexpensively (and unofficially) on DVD. This has the advantage of taking up very little space, and giving you the complete issues (every page scanned, including the ads) and is therefore the next best thing to having the original issues, that is otherwise reformatted and often re-colored in reprinted book editions. For much of the 1940's and 1950's material that is not popular enough to warrant a book reprinting, this is a format it is at least available to read.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-08-28 5:04 PM



If Kirby were still alive he would be celebrating his 99th birthday today.

Even with him 22 years gone, his legacy and a continuous stream of new editions of his work are still unfolding.




Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-08-28 5:20 PM


Here's to the future!
This version courtesy of Kirby's OMAC # 3, Feb 1975.





Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-09-13 11:36 PM

Wow, I forgot when Joe Simon died (October 11, 1913- December 14, 2011.)

Here's a photo of Simon and Kirby together in the 1950's.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-09-13 11:46 PM






I love this photo of Kirby. It poses him as a guy of small stature, who achieves greatness through his art and imagination. Though the creator of many great pages and stories, the man himself, as posed, is vastly overshadowed by the work he created.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2016-09-16 9:24 AM


Here are the only 1970's DC stories by Kirby not reprinted recently in collected hardcover or trade form, JUSTICE INC. 2-4 by Kirby. Issue 1 by Al McWilliams is also linked at the end after the Kirby stories. All written by Dennis O'Neil, the only O'Neil/Kirby series collaboration. (With the exception of RICHARD DRAGON KUNG FU FIGHTER 3, Sept 1975.)
Another crimefighting pulp adventure character, JUSTICE INC is an interesting companion series to O'Neil's run on THE SHADOW during the same period.

DC even did a new series starring the Avenger character (art by Scott Hampton, as a backup series in the 2010 DOC SAVAGE series) in the last few years, so clearly DC has the rights to publish these stories, but for some reason just didn't include it in the KIRBY OMNIBUS 2 volume!

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-14 5:04 PM

http://comicsalliance.com/creator-rights-before-watchmen-avengers-moore-kirby/


A powerful editorial, about more than just Kirby, but about the Big Two's consistent unethical treatment of creators across the board. But especially unforgivable, their treatment of Alan Moore and Jack Kirby, the two who largely created the foundation their multi-billion-dollar cross-media empires are built on.

It would not only be good ethics, but also simply good and professional business, to reward in some modest proportionate way those whose work built their empires. Even just righting the wrongs of past injustices, from this point forward, would do a great deal to wipe away the company shames of the past, and give back to these companies far more than they stole from Alan Moore, Jack Kirby, Shuster, Siegel and others.
Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-14 5:37 PM
Moore didn't seem to be so creator rightsy when he was building his rep on characters created by other, work for hire, artists/writers, including...Jack Kirby.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-14 6:26 PM
http://www.tcj.com/i-have-not-yet-had-an...chris-roberson/

 Quote:
[INTERVIEWER QUESTION:] You have made your discomfort with DC’s policies very clear. Would you have similar misgivings about working for Marvel?

[writer Chris Roberson: ] I don’t have as clear an understanding of the internal workings of Marvel, of how they deal with their current creators. I can say that I would be deeply uncomfortable on ethical grounds making a living working on, for example, characters created by Jack Kirby whose family receives absolutely no remuneration for it. Yeah, so it’s largely a moot point because I have not been offered work, and at this point I doubt I will, but if offered I would turn it down.

[UPDATE: Chris Roberson has e-mailed in to offer the following correction: “I’ve learned since speaking with you that Marvel reached a settlement with the creators of Captain America some time ago, and in that instance at least the Kirby estate has seen remuneration for Kirby’s creation.”]

[UPDATE 2: Neal Kirby has e-emailed to correct the above: “The settlement Roberson refers to was only between Marvel and Joe Simon. My parents were not part of that action, and never received any remuneration from Marvel for Captain America. Also, neither the estate nor myself and my sisters (separate from the estate) have ever received any funds from Marvel for Captain America.”]


Wow. For all the thousands of pages that Jack Kirby drew, for the central characters KIRBY DIRECTLY CREATED, all the books of his reprinted art on those series, all the subsequent comics, books, licensed toys, cartoons, movies... the Kirby family receives zero in compensation.

And presumably, likewise no compensation for secondary characters Kirby created in FF, THOR, HULK, AVENGERS, X-MEN, and so forth, and the billions those licensed stories and characters have generated in books and other media.




 Quote:


Is there anything you can point to that DC could change that would make you feel comfortable working for them again?

There is, actually, and it was suggested not to me, but in a public forum, I think on Heidi MacDonald’s ComicsBeat.com, by Kurt Busiek. Kurt is tireless in wading into enraged inflamed conversations online and being a voice of reason. But what Kurt suggested was that if Marvel and DC both were to retroactively grandfather their current work-for-hire creator-equity deals— For example, now if you work for DC and you create a character that appears in one of their books, and then years down the line it’s an action figure or it appears in a movie or appears in a TV show or gets republished or whatever the case may be, the person that created that character gets a check. So what Kurt suggested was if DC and Marvel were to grandfather their current equity deals back to 1938 that they would obviate the need for the lawsuits that many of the creators and their estates continue to bring and that also they would have a public relations bonanza on their hands because they would be able to show how they were taking care of the people that made these characters that people cherish now. In much the same way that Time Warner settled with Siegel and Shuster in the ’70s so they could trot them out for the premiere of the Superman movie. How great would it be if Time Warner could point to how they were helping pay for Tony DeZuniga’s hospital bills while they were promoting the Jonah Hex film, or whatever the case may be. I think if they took better care of the people who created the characters that other hands now service, that would do a great deal to engender fonder feelings on my part.

One other thing I would add is that if DC and Marvel did retroactively grant the creator-equity deals to their former creators, we wouldn’t need a Hero Initiative now, because those guys would be getting money. It would reduce the profits a miniscule amount for the larger corporations, but it would take care of entire generations of now dying old men and women who have gone on to see their creations continue to generate revenue they or their children don’t have any part of.

Your career previous to comics was in science fiction and prose publishing. Do you ever have conversations with your friends from that world about creators’ rights in comics, and if so, how do they react?

I’ve had those conversations and it depends. I mean, to people that have a blushing familiarity with prose novels, they’re aghast at the way that the rights structures work, at least for work-for-hire stuff, but for those novelists who’ve done work-for-hire novels, whether it’s writing novels for tie-ins for TV shows or games or action figures or whatever the case may be, they’re perfectly sanguine about it, because it’s the same thing. The difference is that in the prose world, the work-for-hire stuff is a very small sliver that is kind of—I don’t want to say the bottom rung, but it’s not the thing that the most attention is paid to. More attention is paid to stuff that people create themselves and own. And there are sometimes confused looks when I have to explain that the reverse is true in the comics industry.



Wow again.

Busiek speculates that simply compensating creators and their families would pay for itself in public goodwill and P.R. of being good to their creative talent.

And further, that it would save Marvel and DC tons of money they would continue losing for decades in endless litigation.

It's disgusting to me that Shuster and Siegel won a suit over ACTION COMICS # 1, and yet because it went right back into more litigation, they never saw a dime of that.
And that Alan Moore chooses not to sue, to avoid similar draining legal costs, and would be barred from speaking publicly about his dealings with DC, because in that situation it would be regarding a pending legal case.
Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-14 8:36 PM
I think Moore would have a big problem suing because so much of his "original" work is based on their existing characters. Even "Watchmen" started as his spin on the Charleton characters.

For example:

Do you compensate Alan Moore for "creating" Rorshach when he bascially was a renamed version of the Question? And when you do, what about Ditko's rights? Do you have to credit Ditko as a co-creator of Rorshach? I can't see Moore going for that.

And if taking an existing character and putting a new spin on it (ala, again the Question) entitles one to compensation as the creator what about characters who were revised and revamped but kept the same name? Is, for example, Frank Miller now entitled to be considered a co-creator of Batman because of how radically he re-envisioned aspects of the character?

It really is more of a minefield than Kirby supporters like to believe. And, as I've said before, Jack Kirby was a well-established pro when he worked for Marvel in the 1960s and knew exactly how work for hire operated. He got paid the same whether a book sold well or it flopped. He certainly didn't hand his paycheck back in when a book didn't sell. He gambled that signing off his rights was a better bet than keeping the rights and self-publishing.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-15 9:47 AM
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Moore didn't seem to be so creator rightsy when he was building his rep on characters created by other, work for hire, artists/writers, including...Jack Kirby.



Good point.

Marvel doesn't compensate the Kirby family, but I don't know what DC does. I recall Dick Giordano in the 80's saying that when DC did reprints of stuff like GREEN LANTERN/GREEN ARROW, NEW GODS, DEADMAN and other early/mid 1980's baxter reprint books, that DC at that point paid the same rates for reprints as they paid writers and artists on newly published work.
I don't know if that policy carries on into the collected books DC publishes in the modern era.

I'd like to think Moore is more creator-aware than he was in his early 30's (circa 1983-1989) when he was working for DC.
But it can't be disputed that he was far more aware in his 30's of legal contracts, than were, say, Shuster and Siegel at age 18, when they were swindled out of the rights to Superman.

As I posted earlier in the topic, there was a SWAMP THING issue where Moore brought in Kirby's character The Demon, where Alan Moore had a dedication to Kirby by the story credits, "Dedicated with awe and affection to Jack Kirby".
And yes, it arguably is hypocritical that he built his reputation while utilizing others' work-for-hire characters. Similar to his story "Pictopia" in ANYTHING GOES 2 (1986), that was critical of the "dark" trend in comics, despite his being one of the major proponents of bringing in what he himself termed a "Dark Age" in comics.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-15 11:23 AM
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
I think Moore would have a big problem suing because so much of his "original" work is based on their existing characters. Even "Watchmen" started as his spin on the Charleton characters.

For example:

Do you compensate Alan Moore for "creating" Rorshach when he bascially was a renamed version of the Question? And when you do, what about Ditko's rights? Do you have to credit Ditko as a co-creator of Rorshach? I can't see Moore going for that.


Yeah, it gets really complicated. As innovative as the storytelling in WATCHMEN is, the characters as you say are all unquestionably thinly veiled imitations of copyrighted Charleton heroes, that DC editorial management asked Moore to create, so he could do his story without killing off the previously copyrighted Charleton heroes. So it gets really complicated who "created" or owns the characters in WATCHMEN. Plenty there for DC to keep Moore in litigation for many years.

But from the other perspective, the Charleton characters re-packaged in WATCHMEN existed for roughly 2 decades virtually unknown, until Moore's innovations brought them to the peak of sales and acclaim that they never would have in other hands. Still, even with that argument, they were never 100% Moore's creation, a lot was there before Moore entered the picture.

 Originally Posted By: the G-man

And if taking an existing character and putting a new spin on it (ala, again the Question) entitles one to compensation as the creator what about characters who were revised and revamped but kept the same name? Is, for example, Frank Miller now entitled to be considered a co-creator of Batman because of how radically he re-envisioned aspects of the character?

It really is more of a minefield than Kirby supporters like to believe. And, as I've said before, Jack Kirby was a well-established pro when he worked for Marvel in the 1960s and knew exactly how work for hire operated. He got paid the same whether a book sold well or it flopped. He certainly didn't hand his paycheck back in when a book didn't sell. He gambled that signing off his rights was a better bet than keeping the rights and self-publishing.


I would hope that Miller is compensated for his enormous contribution to the Batman mythology. While he did not create Batman, his ideas are visible in the last 30 years of Batman stories by other creators, and elements in THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS are adapted into several of the Batman movies, that have grossed in the hundreds of millions, if not billions. I'd hope that Miller at least gets generously compensated in royalties on the DARK KNIGHT RETURNS and YEAR ONE trades and hardcovers. He probably receives none for his concepts in 30 years of stories his two works inspired. And likewise probably no compensation for his ideas used in the films and cartoons. And since he did not actually create Batman, that is a reasonable limit.

I feel the same way about Kirby's work for Marvel and DC. That he (or his family/estate) should get a percentage of the profits for any new published book of the art and stories for which Kirby is directly credited. And at least a tiny slice of the movies based on these concepts, such as X-men, Avengers and Fantastic Four, particularly the movies and series adapting the stories Kirby specifically created. At some point, like Shakespeare, Edgar Allen Poe, or Jules Verne, all these characters will become public domain, and belong to neither Marvel or the Kirby estate. And at that point, anyone can publish them without copyright/ownership issues.

John Byrne in an editorial in FANTASTIC FOUR CHRONICLES, published in 1982, said that he accepts the work-for-hire arrangement without complaint, because he accepts that while the company profits off his work if it is successful, the company also can take a financial loss if his ideas are not well received by readers. And whether it sells or not, he still gets paid. With additional royalties if it is successful.

In Alan Moore's case, I don't really understand his level of animosity toward DC, who while they obviously didn't cut him in on the additional licensing revenue, still made him a millionaire! While he arguably could be compensated more, he has been far more compensated than other workhorses and major contributors to Marvel and DC, such as Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, Gil Kane, Berni Wrightson and others, whose best work was published before the modern system of royalties and creators' rights was put in place in the early 1980's.

In a COMICS JOURNAL 138 interview in 1990, Gary Groth interviewing Alan Moore voiced his contempt for the Image Comics guys, whose characters like McFarlane's SPAWN and Jim Lee's WILDCATS were barely veiled copyrighted re-workings of the Marvel series they had just left (like the Charleton heroes re-invented in WATCHMEN). And after a few issues by McFarlane and Lee, they farmed out these characters to other new talent who, just like at Marvel or DC, got paid work-for-hire. In Groth's words, the only difference between Marvel and Image is "who owns the shit." There is no creative innovation, there is no better compensation of work-for-hire talent.
[** CORRECTION: The issues discussed were in Gary Groth's interview of Neil Gaiman in COMICS Journal 169, July 1994. My apologies for the initial defective memory. ]

But really, how is this any different than someone who works as a restaurant manager, a stockbroker, a bank loan officer, a massage therapist, an advertising account executive, a nurse, or a middle manager?
In any of these fields, you could argue your labor is far more profitable for the company than the compensation they give you. As a rule of thumb, one article I read said whatever a company is paying you, they are earning at least double what they pay you, or you wouldn't be there in the first place. I've calculated at several jobs they earn 4 or 5 times what they pay me for my labor. One more than tenfold.
So is the comics field really that much different in its compensation? Simply because they're glamorous characters and intellectual properties, those contributions to a company are more visible than in other fields.

I think the current creators have a pretty good gig. 10 years ago, I knew a guy who had worked for Marvel, and he said at entry level, a creator doing one 22 page book a month with page rates alone (not including royalties if it sells well) earned about 50,000 a year. One assumes that as they become more established professionally, that goes up. And (as with the Image Comics guys) they can, once established enough break off and work for Dark Horse or Image, or start their own company to get a greater compensation for their established following and marketability.
As in any other field.
Arguably that's as fair as any other professional field, you establish yourself, develop marketable talent, and then seek greater compensation for that established talent.

Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-16 4:57 PM
Let's face it: Moore is just a crazy man. He might be a great writer but he's nuts.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-21 10:10 PM

Yeah, as a small example of that beyond the above, I looked a while back at Alan Moore's Wikipedia listing. It listed his self-described religious belief as "neo-paganism".

I read the linked description of that belief 4 times, and still have no idea what the hell it means.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-22 8:09 PM
Relevant to the above discussion of compensation for the above creators, I looked online to get a rough idea what they're worth:


Alan Moore: $10 million

Frank Miller: $40 million

Neil Gaiman: $18 million


And the biggest surprise:

Jack Kirby: $10 million


Also a surprise:

Stan Lee: Maybe 50 million

Stan Lee: Not as wealthy as you think. (and linked PLAYBOY interview.)

Lee, like those he hired, was also work-for-hire!

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-22 8:13 PM


By comparison:

Barack Obama (2016): $12.2 million


Relative to the most recent past leader of the free world, none of these guys, including Jack Kirby's estate, is doing that badly.
Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-24 9:18 PM
https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/02/24/...-seems-reduced/
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-02-28 8:27 PM
 Originally Posted By: Bleeding Cool article above

Jack Kirby’s Fantastic Four World’s Greatest Artist’s Edition is 168 pages and 15” x 22” – the same size as Kirby’s original art.

This book will feature reproduction of the original art for four complete “twice-up” stories from Fantastic Four #33 (Side-by-Side With the Sub-Mariner), #45 (Among Us Hide… the Inhumans!), #47 (Beware the Hidden Land!), and #60 (The Peril and the Power!)

In addition to the four issues, the book will contain reproduction of the original art for 22 Kirby Fantastic Four covers, many pin-ups, splashes, and interior pages from classic issues dating back all the way to Fantastic Four #3.


Yeah... while these oversized "Artist Edition" reproductions of original art are interesting, somehow I just can't bring myself to shell out the cash for them. I mean, it's almost all stuff I have in its comic book form, some of it I also have in multiple forms, like Marvel Masterworks or DC Archive hardcover editions, or trades, in addition to the original issues.

One I saw that was really nice was an "artist edition" of Barry Smith's CONAN work.

Another recent original art reproduction book of Kirby work reproduced some of his best 70's DC work, such as his KAMANDI and DEMON first issues. Titled JACK KIRBY: PENCILS AND INKS.

The one you list is from IDW, and reprints original art of FANTASTIC FOUR 33, 45, 47, 60, and scattered other FF pages. Arguably Kirby's most definitive and most popular work. Although I've always been most attached to his 70's DC work from 1970-1975.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2017-08-29 8:07 PM



Yesterday was a busy day for me, but I just want to draw attention to Kirby's birthday yesterday on August 28th. In particular this birthday. If he were still alive, this would be his 100th birthday.

Especially for the occasion, Two Morrows created a new book titled KIRBY 100, which along with Kirby art, also has tribute by 100 comics professionals.




Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2018-01-29 8:56 AM



I just found this online and wanted to share it.

If you haven't read KAMANDI 1, November 1972 by Jack Kirby, here it is for your reading pleasure, in its entirety.

Enjoy.

Arguably Kirby's most successful new series of the 1970's era, and for a few years, DC's best selling title. Whether it's NEW GODS 7, THE DEMON 1 and 2, OMAC 1, or KAMANDI 1, ETERNALS 1 and 2, or later the Machine Man origin story "X-51" in 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY issue 8, Kirby demonstrates a talent for doing powerful origin stories.

It even includes the initial map of Kamandi's world that covers most of the series. Kirby only started to venture beyond it in the last few of his 40 issues.


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2018-09-08 1:06 PM




Kirby's 101st birthday was August 28th.

A little bit after the fact, but still wanted to commemorate it. I chose the above double page spread from Kirby's SILVER STAR 2, published by Pacific Comics in April 1983. Showing that even at the twilight of Kirby's career when he arguably wasn't doing his best work, he was still capable of producing memorable and impressive pages, on a par with his KAMANDI, DEMON, ETERNALS or BLACK PANTHER work.







Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2018-09-08 3:52 PM





From his last few months at Marvel in 1970, this page from SILVER SURFER 18, the last issue of the series, and the only issue drawn by Kirby.

One of those random single-issue stories by Kirby that few people know about. Along with anthology mystery stories in CHAMBER OF DARKNESS 4 and 5,
And a brief series of 10-page Inhumans stories in AMAZING ADVENTURES 1-4, these were among the last few stories Kirby did for Marvel in 1970.

Possibly Kirby was experimenting with new characters other than the ones he normally worked on, or he was churning out pages to fill out his contract before departing over to DC. Since most of these stories he both wrote and pencilled, I suspect he wanted to do work himself that Stan Lee couldn't take credit for. Or possibly he was warming up for doing a ton of writer/artist work he'd soon be doing at DC, his first writer/artist work in 10 years. In any case, they're interesting stories, for being obscurities outside the work he is known for.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2018-09-09 10:00 AM

Wow, scarcely do I mention Kirby's writer/artist run in AMAZING ADVENTURES 1-4, than a day later I run across this outstandingly intelligent video discussing those stories, as a microcosm of the recurring themes in Kirby's storytelling and artwork.

Jack Kirby's Evolution - Comic Tropes (Episode 68)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZKcMQFjErk


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2018-11-17 5:24 AM



The double-page splash from MISTER MIRACLE 7, April 1972.

One of my favorites of Kirby's 1970-1975 work. I think issues 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS and MISTER MIRACLE were the issues where these series really took form. Regrettable that these series were just on the edge of being concluded when they were cancelled out from under Kirby. And that we had to wait 13 years only to get... THE HUNGER DOGS graphic novel, instead of whatever would have been the actual and far better conclusion while Kirby was still in peak form.

For me, I pretend HUNGER DOGS never happened, and that the actual conclusion is Levitz/Giffen's "Great Darkness saga" in LEGION 290-294. Which unlike HUNGER DOGS, is a satisfying conclusion, and still leaves some compelling mystery as to the details of what happened over the intervening 1,000 years.

But for whatever flaws, Kirby's Fourth World is a mind-blowing torrent of concepts and visuals. Even Kirby's 15-issue JIMMY OLSEN run, though lighter in tone, delivers a similar endless stream of characters, worlds and concepts.





Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-04-17 4:59 AM


MARVEL AND JACK KIRBY HEIRS REACH SETTLEMENT


 Quote:

September 29, 2014
by Courtney Key


A legal battle poised to head to the Supreme Court was forestalled Friday, as the heirs of legendary comic creator Jack Kirby reached a settlement with Marvel.
The details of the settlement have not been publicly released, but Marvel and the Kirby estate issued a joint statement regarding the decision.

“Marvel and the family of Jack Kirby have amicably resolved their legal disputes, and are looking forward to advancing their shared goal of honoring Mr. Kirby’s significant role in Marvel’s history,” the statement read.

At issue in the dispute was whether the heirs of Kirby, who died in 1994, had the right in 2009 to issue termination notices on 262 works that Kirby had a hand in creating between 1958 and 1963. The notices went out to Marvel, Fox, Paramount, Sony, and other studios which have made films based on Kirby’s characters.

The Kirby family argued that the termination notices were valid because Kirby held a copyright interest in those works. Marvel’s position was that Kirby, as a work-for-hire artist, had no copyright interest in the characters. Marvel and Disney filed suit against the heirs in 2010 to invalidate the termination notices. A lower court ruled for Marvel in 2011, and an appeal by the heirs to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals was subsequently denied.

Had the appeal by the Kirbys to the Supreme Court been successful, the heirs would have been entitled to possibly millions of dollars of royalties on movies such as Iron Man and The Avengers, and Marvel would have had to negotiate with them for the right to use Kirby’s characters in future films.

In addition, repercussions would have been felt across the comics industry as work-for-hire creators suddenly gained a basis for claiming copyright interest in their works.



The Supreme Court! To borrow from Biden, that's a big f---ing deal!

I somehow missed this back when it was reported.
But regardless, relevant to our earlier discussion.

It sounds like Marvel settled, to avoid potentially having to make a a far larger settlement, if the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Kirby family.



Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-04-17 5:22 AM
Actually I think marvel settled to avoid bad publicity at a time when their movies were just starting to takeoff.

I think Kirby‘s family settled because they knew they were likely to lose if they took it to trial.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-04-17 5:47 AM




Another Kirby double-page spread. This one from an unpublished 1978 adaptation of the British TV series THE PRISONER. Kirby did a full issue, complete script, pencils and partially inked, that I have xeroxes of from years ago. There were two abortive attempts, one issue by Kirby, and a previous issue by Englehart and Gil Kane.

Not until 1988 was there a published THE PRISONER series, by Dean Motter.


A later PRISONER series at least utilized this Kirby splash page as a cover. It would be nice to see the full work published.

I keep it boxed with an "unpublished wing" of my collection, and store these Kirby and Gil Kane PRISONER xeroxes with:
* CANCELLED COMIC CAVALCADE (the 30 abruptly cancelled DC titles from Oct 1978, collected in two Xerox volumes, about 200 pages each),
* the unpublished Kirby DINGBATS 2 and 3 (issue 1 is FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL 6),
* and the unpublished Rick Veitch "Swamp Thing meets Jesus" story (if I recall, what would have been issue 88, in 1989. Veitch quit the series when DC without warning said they would not publish it).

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-04-17 5:55 AM


Wow, released as a PRISONER artist edition, not even a year ago!

https://www.amazon.com/Prisoner-Jack-Kirby-Gil-Kane/dp/1785862871





Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-06-11 3:07 AM



Behold...






THE DEMON issue 1, pages 2 and 3, July 1972

47 years ago I first saw this, and it's still one of the coolest pages I've ever seen.



Full story to read online at:
https://comiconlinefree.com/the-demon-1972/issue-1


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-07-31 2:41 AM





SSERPO!

By Stan Lee, with Kirby/Ayers art. Ayers remains among my favorite Kirby inkers, for all the monster, war, western and romance stories
where he inked Kirby's art from 1960-1963, and on FF 6-20 (issue 5 was inked by Sinnott, 1-2 by George Klein, 3-4 by Sol Brodsky).
And Ayers inked the 1st issue of AVENGERS.
Ayers also inked SGT FURY issues 1, 2, 3, and 13 over Kirby (1963), before taking over as penciller of that series for close to 20 years.

"SSSERPO!" appeared in AMAZING ADVENTURES 6, Nov 1961 (cover dated the same month as FANTASTIC FOUR 1)

Kirby's pre-Marvel monster stories (and likewise the Ditko stories of that era, circa 1958-1963) remain among my favorites of his work.

Full story at:
https://marswillsendnomore.wordpress.com/2012/12/23/jack-kirbys-monsters-sserpo/

In a larger more readable size:

AMAZING ADVENTURES 6 cover
page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
With links to more pre-Marvel Lee/Kirby stories.

A rare treat in that era was the occasional Kirby/Ditko art combination. The last Kirby/Ditko story I'm aware of is FANTASTIC FOUR 13,
introducing the Watcher, and the Blue Area of the moon, some of which is reproduced by Byrne/Austin in the famous conclusion to the
Phoenix storyline in X-MEN 137 in 1980.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-08-29 2:44 AM





Today is Kirby's 102nd birthday.
Look how excited these guys are!

A pin-up from FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL 5, November 1967. (Out the same month as FF 68.) One of multiple pin-ups in the same issue.
Most of the others are of the Inhumans and FF. Kirby was 50 years old when he drew this.
Who could have imagined how dominant and influential Kirby's work would become, and on the back of it how dominant Marvel
would become, when his 102-issue FF run was coming out every month?

He passed away 25 years ago, but his star has not faded.
The work and Kirby's legacy endures.



Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-08-29 3:24 AM





Even so, much as I love Kirby's FF, THOR and other Marvel 1960's work, my heart is even more in Kirby's 1970-1975 DC work. In particular his JIMMY OLSEN, FOREVER PEOPLE, NEW GODS, MISTER MIRACLE, THE DEMON, KAMANDI, OMAC, JUSTICE INC., and FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL runs.
I think there was never a time in my 47 years of collecting where I eagerly awaited each new month's comics than when KAMANDI, THE DEMON and OMAC were coming out.

The above masterpiece is pages 2 and 3 of THE DEMON 2, Nov 1972. Very atmospheric, I love the way Kirby draws statues, rock, and old castles. I think Kirby was at his peak in 1971-1972, with Royer inking his work. A bit more loose than the detail of his 1965-1966 work, but beautiful and decorative in
a new way.

I also loved Kirby's work from 1976-1978, on:
THE ETERNALS 1-19, and ANNUAL 1,
CAPTAIN AMERICA 193-216, ANNUAL 4 and 5,
CAPTAIN AMERICA'S BICENTENNIAL BATTLES treasury,
2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY movie adaptation treasury,
and the 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY series issues 1-10,
MACHINE MAN 1-9 (spun off from 2001 issues 8-10),
BLACK PANTHER 1-12,
and DEVIL DINOSAUR 1-9.
And WHAT IF issue 11 ("What if the Marvel Bullpen Staff got the FF's powers")

Not quite as high on my list as Kirby's 70's DC work, but still a lot of great stuff, particularly ETERNALS 1 and 2, and 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY issue 8 (the origin of Machine Man).

From 1959-1978, Kirby produced just an enormous body of work, across a multitude of genres and characters, that dominated the industry, and still have tremendous influence.

Kirby's later 1980's work on CAPTAIN VICTORY, SILVER STAR, HUNGER DOGS and SUPER POWERS, well... not so much. They are more of an echo, the dying ember of that 20 year period that preceded them.

But man... the work itself in that 1959-1978 period, and the enduring influence on artists like John and Sal Buscema, Rich Buckler, Keith Giffen, George Perez, John Byrne, Steranko, Ladronn, Allred and many others, is just beyond measure.




Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-09-09 10:13 AM

Here's a great documentary on Kirby's life and work I just watched:

Jack Kirby: Story Teller (Jack Kirby art) Full documentary


Comics creators and friends shown include Len Wein, Marv Wolfman, Mark Evanier, Steve Sherman, Walt Simonson, Steve Rude, John Romita Sr., two of Kirby's own children who lived with him across those decades, along with many other comics writers and artists.
They discuss Kirby's art style and influence, their personal relationships with Kirby, his personal life and work habits, and the major events of his life as a comics professional.

One part that was really interesting is that what Kirby wanted but was denied at both Marvel and DC in the 1960's and 1970's, as far as royalties, creator ownership and profit sharing, have been part of Marvel and DC contracts for any starting artist since 1985.
Just after Kirby's career ended. That if Marvel had just given him that kind of a contract in 1969, he probably would have spent the remainder of his career at Marvel.


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2019-12-31 3:41 AM

http://www.tcj.com/a-96th-birthday/


Here's an interesting and lengthy piece from THE COMICS JOURNAL on Kirby, with a lot of behind-the-scenes photos of Kirby, going back to his World War II days, and with his children in the 1950's and 1960's.

But it mostly discusses the issue of character creation, plot and story credit not given to Kirby by Stan Lee for the creation of Silver Age Marvel.

It gets pretty down and dirty in the viewer comments after the article. I think it's pretty beyond dispute that Kirby did a lot more than he was given credit for, and on a lot of pencil pages, in the side margins Kirby supplied plot and dialogue, much of which was used verbatim by Stan Lee, while Lee took credit for the writing.

The wildest for me is that when Martin Goodman suggested to Lee (as Lee himself describes in ORIGINS OF MARVEL COMICS, 1974) Goodman suggested that JLA was a big seller for DC, and persuaded Lee to do a similar superhero group for Atlas/Marvel in 1961. But in ORIGINS OF MARVEL, Lee says that he came up with all the characters and concepts, and then gave it to Kirby to draw.

But as detailed here, Lee apparently wanted to do another revival of Sub-Mariner, Captain America and the Human Torch (which previous revival had failed miserably in 1954-1955) and it was Jack Kirby and Sol Brodsky who had pushed Lee that it would be better to use new characters, that gave us the FF.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-01-17 5:09 PM


From Mark Evanier's online blog:


https://www.newsfromme.com/?s=jack+kirby

 Quote:
Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 12:33 AM.


Had he not left us when he did, Jack Kirby would be celebrating his 102nd birthday today. He also would be celebrating that he is increasingly getting the kind of recognition that was frustratingly denied him during his lifetime. Oh, a lot of people — darn near everyone in the comic book industry, near as I can tell — knew that he
was more than a great artist; that he was also a writer and a creator and that so many brilliant ideas during the years he worked in comics sprang from his brilliant mind.

They all knew that but it was rarely said aloud by certain parties when it might have led to better contacts and compensation for Jack…and seeing his authorship and co-authorship properly acknowledged while he and his life-partner Roz were around to see it. I would also like it if Jack had lived to see his work — especially his
"Fourth World" books for DC (New Gods, Forever People, Mister Miracle, some of Jimmy Olsen) — reprinted and reprinted and reprinted and reprinted constantly, often in high-ticket hardcovers, to fill a demand for work which, at the time it first came out, was dismissed by some as a failure.

Make no mistake about this: Jack knew it would happen. He didn't know when but he knew it would happen. With each passing year, I more appreciate his brilliance, his prescience and his basic decency as human being. I also more appreciate his work but I think that's true of most of us who read it. I don't need to tell anyone
how good the stories and drawings he put on paper were. That, you can see for yourself. Just trust me on this: If you liked the work, you would have loved the man who did it. Perhaps you already do.

As I write this, Disney theme parks are festooned with the name of Kirby. Yes, of course, they're promoting a product — the upcoming film of The Eternals, based on a Kirby creation. Like it or not, that's how you get hailed in the world today…by association with something that is very, very popular and therefore very, very lucrative.
Disney is also hailing him as a creator or co-creator of most of the Marvel Super-Heroes.

I understand there are those who think it is not enough. I also understand that there are those who think Disney is blurring the history a bit to make it seem like these were Disney creations, not Disney purchases. All I can say is that I believe Jack was severely wronged by folks who owned these characters in the past. They denied
him the two things that mattered to him: Proper credit and meaningful compensation for the Kirby family. He has them now. I'm happy and I don't know anyone who actually knew Jack who is not delighted with how things have turned out.

We all have a great deal of trouble talking about what's come to pass without using phrases like "Oh, if only he were here to see it." But like I said, he knew. I don't know how he know but he knew. Happy birthday, Jack. I will never stop thanking you…for all you did for me and for all you did for everyone.




For all the "recognition" given Kirby, I still doubt Marvel, DC, or Disney are adequately compensating Kirby for the level of profit gained from his work.

I recall Dave Stevens said of the Rocketeer movie that he was compensated "in the low six figures" for his licensed characters. Probably in the neighborhood of $200,000. For his one creation.
How much more does Kirby (or his surviving family) deserve for the dozens of profitable characters Kirby has given to the comics publishing field, and to films, tv series, animated series, and licensed toys and so forth?

I would consider the scales reasonably balanced if Marvel and DC at least gave the Kirby family 1 or 2% of every comic book, collected paperback or collected hardcover those 2 companies constantly put back in print of Kirby's stories. But I doubt his family get any part of that.

It would be great if Disney gave a generous compensation to the Kirby estate for an Eternals movie, and it guilted and generated public pressure on Marvel and DC to likewise follow with (finally) appropriate compensation to the Kirby family proportionate to the Marvel/DC profit from Kirby's work.

There are two people in comics I think deserve compensation like no others.
One is Jack Kirby.
The other is Neal Adams.

But in the case of Adams, he did less than 200 comics in his most influential period, and he has been generously compensated. Whereas Kirby, despite his unequalled contribution, has not. Again, not even getting into movies and other character licensing, just a tiny percentage of book printing of Jack Kirby's comics alone would be a
significant windfall for the Kirby family. But even from the stories themselves in print, I don't see evidence that the Kirby family receives a dime from even those books.
There is what is legal, and there is what is fair. This is how the industry treats its most prolific and iconic creator.



Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-01-17 8:55 PM
Kirby doesn’t deserve shit. He was an experienced creator who made a conscious choice to repeatedly enter into work for hire arrangements rather than start his own business and take any risk.

Adams, to his credit, had the balls to walk away from DC and Marvel and start his own studio. Furthermore, Adams was not afraid to go to bat for people who are genuinely ripped off like Seagal and Schuster. He wasn’t just fighting for creator rights for himself.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-01-18 3:17 AM
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Kirby doesn’t deserve shit. He was an experienced creator who made a conscious choice to repeatedly enter into work for hire arrangements rather than start his own business and take any risk.

Adams, to his credit, had the balls to walk away from DC and Marvel and start his own studio. Furthermore, Adams was not afraid to put himself at great career risk for people who were genuinely ripped off like Seigel and Schuster. He wasn’t just fighting for creator rights for himself.


At times I believe everything you just said. Adams did show a level of courage and willingness to break out on his own and leave the comics industry behind. While in the 1970's Adams was in his 30's and Kirby in his 50's, both had wives and children and mortgages, and there was risk.
I think Kirby was more in love with comics, and thus more reluctant to leave it behind for animation or other ventures. But he finally did after 1978, and only came back once creator rights and royalties began. But alas, way past his prime.

Mark Evanier, in one of the documentaries I linked a page or so back, said that what Kirby wanted in the 1960's and 1970's is now the standard contract, and if he could have gotten that in 1963 or 1970 or 1978, he gladly would have stayed the remainder of his career at Marvel. Now Kirby would not even have to fight for it, it's the standard contract.

And I just feel that retroactively, that should be offered to the Kirby estate, by both DC and Marvel, for Kirby's singular contribution to both companies. That's not too much to ask for the single greatest contributor to those two companies, spanning from the 1940's till 1978. That's not just handing it to Kirby, I think he earned it, ten times over. That's just giving proper compensation. His family should have what the surviving family of any current Marvel or DC contributor would receive.

There's very few who I think gave such a contribution that would be appropriate. Jack Kirby. Stan Lee. Steve Ditko. Neal Adams. Will Eisner. It's a pretty small club.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-06 10:43 PM



DINGBAT LOVE (hardcover, Two Morrows, 160p, released Jan 21 2020)
https://www.amazon.com/Jack-Kirbys-Dingb...83515925&sr=8-1


The last of Kirby's 1970-1976 DC material, released in a new edition.

The "Dingbat" part comes from a Kirby tryout series in FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL issue 6, a kid gang title called DINGBATS. I found out from speaking to John Morrow at Orlandocon in 1998 that there was a lot of Kirby material created for DC that was never released, including 2 additional issues of DINGBATS. I have xeroxes of the unpublished DINGBATS issues I purchased about 15 years ago.

The "Love" part of the title comes from two other unpublished Kirby projects. Similar to Kirby's IN THE DAYS OF THE MOB and SPIRIT WORLD magazines published in 1971, there was a huge volume of Kirby anthology stories created for two other proposed magazines, TRUE DIVORCE CASES, and a black-audience-targeted romance magazine SOUL LOVE.
Given the way Kirby was jerked around with DAYS OF THE MOB and SPIRIT WORLD (both of which DC published only the first issue of each, despite that Kirby created 2 complete issues of both series) Kirby shelved the romance titles.
Over the last 25 years or so, Two Morrows has published many pages and complete stories from these lost issues in their fan press magazine THE JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR. But this book marks the first time they've been released in one publication in their entirety, finally, roughly 50 years later.

SPIRIT WORLD was also released in 2012 in magazine-sized hardcover form, with both complete issues for the first time. (the second issue material was split up and published across DC's color comics DARK MANSION 6 and WEIRD MYSTERY 1-3 in 1972, but in the hardcover is reprinted together for the first time in its original black and white form. The 1972 comics also include Kirby photo-collage and text features for the aborted issue 2 that are not in the collected hardcover. I actually prefer the issue 2 stuff in the color comics.)

And DAYS OF THE MOB likewise was released in hardcover in 2013 with the complete issues 1 and 2. (Only one story from issue 2 was ever published before this hardcover, in AMAZING WORLD OF DC COMICS fanzine issue 1, in 1974. The rest all is published here for the first time.)

It's amazing to me that all this material, unpublished for decades, is finally all in print.



The only other unpublished story I mentioned earlier, what would have been SANDMAN 7 in 1975 if the title was not prematurely cancelled (and what would have later seen print in KAMANDI 61 in 1978, if that title likewise had not been prematurely cancelled, that was printed as xeroxes in CANCELLED COMIC CAVALCADE in 1978, that finally saw print in some mainstream form in THE BEST OF DC digest issue 22 in March 1982) finally saw print in KIRBY OMNIBUS, VOLUME 2 hardcover in 2013, and again more recently in JACK KIRBY BRONZE AGE OMNIBUS hardcover in 2019.

Leaving only Kirby's JUSTICE INC. issues 2-4 his only remaining 1970's DC material not re-released in hardcover or trade form.

Kirby's Fourth World material also has been released in several new hardcovers and trades. I like the material best as it was separated into four trades of:
JIMMY OLSEN 133-139,141-148
NEW GODS 1-11, NEW GODS 6 (1984), and HUNGER DOGS (1985)
MISTER MIRACLE 1-18

and soon to be released
FOREVER PEOPLE 1-11 (July 2020).

In addition to an 8" X 11" hardcover JACK KIRBY FOURTH WORLD OMNIBUS, at an unweildy 1,500-plus pages. Beware on this version, the first edition has printing errors, and DC did a later printing that buyers could trade for a corrected version.
(earlier Fourth World hardcovers (2007-2008) and trade paperbacks (2011-2012) collected this material across 4 volumes each, in an odd canonization that didn't give you a complete story in any single volume. I much prefer the new trades that collect each individual series in a separate volume)


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-24 5:16 AM




Since DC has left these the only un-collected ones from Kirby's 1970-1976 canon of work for DC, here are the JUSTICE, INC stories, accessible online for your reading pleasure.

issue 1 "THis Night An Avenger Is Born", 18p O'Neil story/ Al McWilliams art
issue 2"The Skywalker", 18 pages, by O'Neil, Kirby/Royer
issue 3 "The Monster Bug", 18 pages, by O'Neil, Kirby/Royer
issue 4 "Slay Ride In The Sky", 18 pages, by O'Neil, Kirby/Royer

--------

More recently added on a more easily navigated site, in a larger size:
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-Inc-1975/Issue-2?id=171290



Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-24 5:35 AM
Al McWilliams' art on "Justice Inc." is serviceable but terribly dated for that era. It looks like something from a late 50s Charleton comic, during a time where guys like Adams, Wrightson, Smith and Starlin were breaking boundaries and expanding the medium. That alone would have hurt the book's chances.

Kirby's stuff was better but, as your source notes, his heart clearly wasn't in it.

The first issue cover by Joe Kubert shows what could have been. While I know Kubert of that era would have been busy with war comics and setting up his art school, it's very unfortunate that he wasn't given lead art duties that the project. A Kubert "Justice Inc.," in era of experimental comics like "Warlord" selling big numbers, could have been a real contender for DC.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-24 6:06 AM



Well, with Kirby, his art was more loose and less detiled than guys like Adams, Wrightson, Kaluta and Aparo, but up till 1972 I think that while Kirby's art didn't have the same detail as it did in his 1966 FANTASTIC FOUR (say, around FF issues 44-65), as in the two above splash pages from THE DEMON, his art is still beautiful and visually striking.

Even in Kirby's looser work in 1973-1978, Kirby still from just a conceptual storytelling point of view was right on the pulse of what readers wanted. KAMANDI for a while was DC's best seller. THE DEMON was also popular, and his "Chariots of the Gods"-themed THE ETERNALS series was popular as well. I didn't like everything Kirby did, but I liked a high ratio, and he has a very consistent style across every series he worked on.


I don't know what happened with Al McWilliams. He seemed to have lost work elsewhere, and then picked up loose work at Marvel and DC to pick up the slack starting in 1974-1975. Possibly he worked on comic strips before that.
Aside from this JUSTICE INC issue 1 story, he also inked John Byrne IRON FIST stories in MARVEL PREMIERE 25, and then the first issue of IRON FIST in his own book.
And on Gold Key's original series STAR TREK comic book, issues 38-61 (July 1976-March 1979), and a Black Hood comic book produced around 1975, that wasn't published until 1983-1984, with rare shorter separate stories by Al McWilliams, Neal Adams and Gray Morrow, in BLUE RIBBON COMICS 8, 1983.

There was also a separate BLACK HOOD comic, 3 issues, issue 1 of which had a few pages of McWilliams, along with stories by Morrow, Wildey, Toth, Spiegle and Boyette. I bought these issues years ago for the Toth stories.


Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-31 2:30 PM



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_McWilliams

 Quote:
From 1950 to 1952, McWilliams primarily drew romance comics and crime comics for Lev Gleason Publications.[4] Then in 1952, he and writer Oskar Lebeck created the science-fiction comic strip "Twin Earths", which ran through 1963.[6] From 1966 to 1968, he drew the sea-adventure strip Davy Jones, a spinoff of Sam Leff's Curley Kayoe.[5][7]

McWilliams' and writer John Saunders' Dateline: Danger!, which ran from 1968 to 1974, introduced the first African-American lead character of a comic strip,[8] Danny Raven, co-star of this adventure series about two intelligence agents working undercover as reporters.[9]

Other comic-strip work includes the Star Trek and Buck Rogers strips.[5] He worked as an assistant on John Prentice's Rip Kirby in 1964 and 1965; on Don Sherwood's U.S. Marine strip Dan Flagg from 1965 to 1967; and on Leonard Starr's On Stage in 1969 and 1970.[7] McWilliams also illustrated for advertising.[5]

He drew no confirmed comic-book stories from 1952 through 1965, when he illustrated two tales in Warren Publishing's black-and-white horror comics magazine Creepy. He went on to draw stories in the supernatural/mystery anthology comics Boris Karloff Tales of Mystery and Twilight Zone, two TV-series spinoffs published by Western Publishing's Gold Key Comics, along with a smattering of other stories for that imprint — including some issues of the superhero series Doctor Solar, Man of the Atom — as well as for Warren and Tower Comics. Concentrating on Dateline: Danger!, he drew no comic books from 1968 to 1974. That year he did three supernatural stories for Red Circle Sorcery and Mad House, from Archie Comics' Red Circle Comics imprint, along with a handful of stories for Atlas/Seaboard Comics. He inked roughly a half-dozen Marvel Comics stories in 1975 and illustrated the first issue of DC Comics's Justice Inc. before returning to Gold Key, where he drew and lettered stories through 1982. His work there included issues of Flash Gordon and the TV-spinoff comic Buck Rogers in the 25th Century [and STAR TREK issues 38-61].

His last known comics work is penciling and inking two short stories published in the May 1984 issues of two comics in Archie's Archie Adventure Series imprint, Blue Ribbon Comics #8 and Steel Sterling #6.[4]



Al McWilliams is another o those guys whose work was credited in the 1970's, and largely uncredited before then, but whose work goes all the way back to the earliest Golden Age comics of the 1930's.
My guess is he tested his options at Marvel and DC in 1975, and then found working conditions more to his liking at Gold Key, where he worked until his retirement in 1982.

I wonder if Jack Kirby had any interaction with Al McWilliams.



Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-31 2:37 PM


I especially wonder if there was any friendship and interaction between Kirby and Steve Ditko, because they had the identical problem at Marvel (with Stan Lee, and not getting full credit and control of the stories and characters they created)in the 1960's. Both Kirby and Ditko were introverted recluses.

In addition to that, Kirby and Ditko were a penciller/inker team on a number of stories from 1959-1964.
Including FANTASTIC FOUR 13, April 1963.

And the "FF meet Spider-Man" story in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL 1, Sept 1963.

And a sequel to that in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 8, Jan 1964. The last Kirby/Ditko collaboration I'm aware of.

And on many pre-Marvel mosters stories.
Here's "We Met In the Swamp", from TALES TO ASTONISH 7, Jan 1960.

Kirby and Ditko at least must have had an opinion of the other's work, and on their collaborations. But it's entirely possible they did not meet personally, and just worked on each other's pages, given by editor Stan Lee. But I find it hard to believe with the shared experience Kirby and Ditko had at Marvel that they did not seek out each other and have conversations about that. And perhaps other social get-togethers, outside of Marvel.



Posted By: the G-man Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-31 4:04 PM
 Originally Posted By: Wonder Boy



I especially wonder if there was any friendship and interaction between Kirby and Steve Ditko, because they had the identical problem at Marvel (with Stan Lee, and not gettin full credit and control of the stories and characters they created)in the 1960's. Both Kirby and Ditko were introverted recluses.

In addition to that, Kirby and Ditko were a penciller/inker team on a number of stories from 1959-1964.
Including FANTASTIC FOUR 13, April 1963.
And the "FF meet Spider-Man" story in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL 1, Sept 1963.
And a sequel to that in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 8, Jan 1964. The last Kirby/Ditko collaboration I'm aware of.

And on many pre-Marvel mosters stories.
Here's "We Met In the Swamp", from TALES TO ASTONISH 7, Jan 1960.

Kirby and Ditko at least must have had an opinion of the other's work, and on their collaborations. But it's entirely possible they did not meet personally, and just worked on each other's pages, given by editor Stan Lee. But I find it hard to believe with the shared experience Kirby and Ditko had at Marvel that they did not seek out each other and have conversations about that. And perhaps other social get-togethers, outside of Marvel.





From what little I know about their personal lives and political views, I doubt they would’ve liked each other at all. There’s also the fact that Ditko was not happy about Kirby’s attempts to claim creator credit on Spiderman
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-03-31 4:32 PM


Wow, I hadn't thought of the Kirby claim to have created Spider-man and how Ditko would have reacted to that. But by Stan Lee's account in ORIGINS OF MARVEL COMICS, he was the genius who came up with everything, and just farmed it out to Ditko to draw Lee's preconceived vision. I'm sure Ditko has a very different view of that. Ditko, at least later on, was very active in plotting and developing characters, and likely from the beginning, beyond the lack of credit acknowledged by Stan Lee.

Kirby said he came up with a similar character years before, and I've often seen an unpublished cover for it from 1954, titled NIGHT FIGHTER, that Kirby alleges was re-packaged into what became Spider-man.
This much is true, Kirby did the cover for Spider-man's first appearance in AMAZING FANTASY 15. So who's to say that Kirby might have had additional conceptual contribution to Spider-man early on. But I suspect this is either defective memory on Kirby's part, or his early ideas were vastly changed by Lee and Ditko.

You bring up a great point that Kirby was very liberal/left, whereas Ditko was on the polar opposite end of the spectrum, as an ardent conservative and Ayn Rand/Objectivism follower.
But I have many friends who are liberals despite my own conservatism, and you can share many other interests while disagreeing politically, or even just not discussing politics. In the far more civil (relatively) 1990's, I had a very liberal friend who was a news reporter, and we had lunch several times a week together, and I actually consider him my best friend from that period.

I think that Kirby and Ditko were introverted and not particularly social would have been a more likely barrier to their being friends. But it's still possible they were friends. They were the two giants of their time at Marvel, from roughly 1958-1966, and in Kirby's case 1958-1970. It was only when Ditko died that I realized how many characters he's created, at both Marvel and DC, as well as at Charleton and other companies. I think Ditko is the only other artist who has created characters on a scale as prolific as Jack Kirby.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2020-07-16 4:45 PM


Here's a revealing article from THE JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR issue 60 (Jan 2013), titled "Key 1960's Moments", a 4-page chronological timeline of events at Marvel leading to Kirby's departure, going year by year from 1961 to 1972.
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/The-Jack-Kirby-Collector/Issue-60?id=110616#68

It cites Stan Lee's denied story credit and payment for stories reprinted in FANTASY MASTERPIECES by Kirby, Joe Simon, Carl Burgos (creator of golden age Human Torch), Wally Wood (denied plotting and creative credit on his then-current DAREDEVIL run), Steve Ditko (similarly denied story and creative credit on SPIDER-MAN and DOCTOR STRANGE), and Bill Everett (denied story credit and compensation on reprints of golden age Sub-Mariner stories).

So it wasn't just Kirby or Ditko who were denied credit, denied compensation or denied creative control of the characters they created for Marvel. They were even shorted credit and payment for licensing, comic book reprints for licensing, and Merry Marvel Marching society profits and t-shirts! The 80,000 Marvel t-shirts alone sold on Stan Lee's college lecture circuit, if you estimate the t-shirts sold for $5.00 each, that's $400,000 in gross profits. And then shorted from that, Kirby had to borrow $2,000 from Martin Goodman for his moving costs to California, that took him years to pay back!

Also interesting how Stan Lee went from staeling the glory from Wood for his contributions on DAREDEVIl, compelling Wood to resign in disgust, and Stan Lee just went on to swiping ideas and shortchanging credit from the next artist to draw the series, no lesson learned or better treatment of co-creators going forward.

I didn't know till now that Captain Marvel and the Kree was begun in MARVEL SUPER-HEROES 12, or that Kirby (again uncredited) created the concept.
The timeline through 1970-1971 explains a lot about how Kirby''s stories in AMAZING ADVENTURES 1-4, SILVER SURFER 18, ASTONISHING TALES 1-2, and CHAMBER OF DARKNESS 3-4 came to be created. And toward the end, a lot of editorial changes and creative harassment by Stan Lee, showing his bad treattment and perhaps deliberate harassment of Kirby at the end. I was blown away that Kirby did a Silver Surfer story in FF 74-77, and then right after SILVER SURFER 1 by Lee and Buscema came out the next month, and Kirby was kept completely in the dark about the Buscema series until right before it came out! His own creation. "Kirby felt he had lost creative control of his own character." Yeah, you think?!?

Again, everything Kirby was cheated out of, is now given without reservation in the standard contract for Marvel writers and artists. And if given back then, Kirby would likely have spent the rest of his career at Marvel.

Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2021-08-24 6:12 PM
.


[Linked Image from 2.bp.blogspot.com]

Looks like these guys have started the party already!
August 28th will be Jack Kirby's 104th birthday.


Here's another image, a collage of Kirby art courtesy of the Jack Kirby Museum, assembling Kirby and his 50-plus years of characters in an image patterned after the Beatles' Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album cover.
https://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby.../sites/5/2017/08/JackKirby100res1800.jpg
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2021-08-24 6:59 PM
Originally Posted by Wonder Boy
I especially wonder if there was any friendship and interaction between Kirby and Steve Ditko, because they had the identical problem at Marvel (with Stan Lee, and not getting full credit and control of the stories and characters they created)in the 1960's. Both Kirby and Ditko were introverted recluses.

In addition to that, Kirby and Ditko were a penciller/inker team on a number of stories from 1959-1964.
On many pre-Marvel monster stories.
Here's "We Met In the Swamp", from TALES TO ASTONISH 7, Jan 1960.

And including FANTASTIC FOUR 13, April 1963.

And the "FF meet Spider-Man" story in FANTASTIC FOUR ANNUAL 1, Sept 1963.

And a sequel to that in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 8, Jan 1964. The last Kirby/Ditko collaboration I'm aware of.

Kirby and Ditko at least must have had an opinion of the other's work, and on their collaborations. But it's entirely possible they did not meet personally, and just worked on each other's pages, given by editor Stan Lee. But I find it hard to believe with the shared experience Kirby and Ditko had at Marvel that they did not seek out each other and have conversations about that. And perhaps other social get-togethers, outside of Marvel.

I love the Kirby/Ditko collaborations, so I updated the links and re-posted this one so you can easily access them.
Since the RKMB crash a year or so ago, I can't edit the old posts, and this is the way available for me to update it.

Their collaboration brings out a nice new edge in both of their work, they mesh well together.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2021-08-24 8:45 PM
.
Vince Colletta: The Inker Who Ruined Jack Kirby's Art


Interesting account of Colletta's entire career, beginning on romance comics of the 1950's, Colletta's transition from being a penciller/inker, into becoming exclusively an inker. And the period he was inking Kirby's art. Colletta primarily inked Kirby on JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY/THOR 106-177 and 179 (less a few fill-in issues by Frank Giacoia or Bill Everett), from roughly 1964-1970. Their longest run together.
I agree, I thought Colletta brought a nice visual style to Kirby's THOR run, but it's undeniable that he erased art and turned huge areas into silhouette, to cut corners and do the inking fast. How Colletta actually erased pencils, and turned huge areas of background art into blacked-out silhouette. I know Mark Evanier has railed for years in print and online about how awful Colletta was to Kirby's art, and it's revealed here how Evanier was instrumental as Kirby's assistant at DC in 1971 in having Colletta removed as inker on Kirby's Fourth World books.

After, Colletta became art director in the 1970's at DC, and hired a lot of great talent like Marshall Rogers, Michael Golden and Frank Miller. And I was a huge fan of Mike Grell's THE WARLORD for its entire 50 issue run. Grell pencilled and inked the first 14 issues, Rubinstein inked issue 15, and from 16-50 Colletta inked every issue except for 41, 43, and 45-47. This explains what I didn't previously know, that Grell hated Colletta's inks on his work, and wanted him off the book.
When he went back to Marvel and got work due to his friendship and loyalty to Shooter, and with Shooter's firing got the axe as well, he wrote a vitriolic letter to Marvel's editors, that was hilariously played out in a dramatic reading here, by someone in a British accent, to class it up and add to the drama of it. Hilarious!

Much of this about Colletta I knew to some degree, a lot of it I learned many details here for the first time. It was rumored for years that Colletta had shady dealings with organized crime, and it's revealed here that his father was believed to be a mafia figure, who fled from Sicily to the U.S., before also bringing in his wife and children.
Not mentioned here, Neal Adams (n BRAVE AND THE BOLD 81) and John Byrne (in SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN 58) each had one story inked by Colletta, and were furious about it, and each gave orders that Colletta never be permitted to ink their work again. In Adams' case, after Colletta inked it and Adams saw what was done, Adams completely re-inked away as much of Colletta's work as he could on the pages before they were sent to the printers.

I also love the story about how Stan Lee ran several pages of photos of everyone working in the Marvel bullpen staff (MARVEL TALES ANNUAL 1, Sept 1964) and parents wrote in and complained because they thought Vince Colletta looked like a mobster. Shooter ribbed Colletta about it in a Bullpen Bulletins interview in the page that ran in May 1983 issues.
Also undisclosed in the video, apparently it was a great trauma for Colletta to be fired from Marvel, he died only a year or two after his departure. For all his cutting corners, he apparently gained a lot of fulfillment and identity from his work, and having his career ended so crushingly really took a toll on him. I'd agree with Colletta that after Shooter was fired from Marvel, the work quality there sunk down to hack garbage for many years.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2021-09-03 7:51 PM
.
I just stumbled onto this..



... by artist Tom Scioli, who has done other works in comics over the last 20 years or so in the Kirby style. It's a roughly 200-page biography in comics form of Kirby's life, from his birth and early formative years, and through every stage of his life and career. As much as I already knew, I still learned a lot of backstory I wasn't previously aware of.

It even goes into one of my earlier questions, about what Kirby's personal relationships were with Steve Ditko and others. Kirby and Ditko did have a friendship and socialize outside of Marvel with Steve Ditko, and they did discuss their similar frustrations and deprivations working for Stan Lee. Ditko even tried to convince Kirby to leave as well and offered Kirby work and creative freedom at Charleton, but Kirby has a wife and 5 children, and couldn't afford the pay cut he would get moving from Marvel to Charleton.
Ditko likewise moved to DC, and was likewise disappointed with his lack of creative control of the characters he created at DC, abruptly quitting from the BEWARE THE CREEPER and HAWK AND THE DOVE series he created.
Similarly, Kirby was promised a great deal at DC, that never came to fruition. And Kirby (after Infantino cancelled his Fourth World books in late 1972) similarly after that only stayed till the end of his DC contract in Dec 1975, before returning for another 3 years at Marvel, and then leaving to work in animation after Dec 1978.

I was unaware that Kirby had an earlier heart attack in 1987/1988 and "couldn't even hold a pencil", and from that point forward projects he sold like PHANTOM FORCE for Image, and the SECRET CITY SAGA crossover books for Topps, were from much earlier concept drawings and unfinished pages, or in some cases work finished or completely ghosted by artist/friend Michael Thibedeaux.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2022-10-18 5:48 AM
.

[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]

A photoshopped fake house ad of Kirby characters from THE DEMON, O.M.A.C., 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY, MACHINE MAN, and DEVIL DINOSAUR, that is a nice tribute to the full spectrum Kirby's 1970's work.

Whether at Marvel or DC... THE MAGIC OF KIRBY !
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-06-21 7:38 AM
Originally Posted by Wonder Boy
Kirby's 101st birthday was August 28th.

A little bit after the fact, but still wanted to commemorate it. I chose the above double page spread from Kirby's SILVER STAR 2, published by Pacific Comics in April 1983. Showing that even at the twilight of Kirby's career when he arguably wasn't doing his best work, he was still capable of producing memorable and impressive pages, on a par with his KAMANDI, DEMON, ETERNALS or BLACK PANTHER work.

[Linked Image from live.staticflickr.com]

With updated image.
As we approach Kirby's 106th birthday.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-06-21 7:47 AM
.


Here's another breathtaking panorama, from Kirby's 1976 Marvel Treasury Edition adaptation of 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY.

[Linked Image from media.itsnicethat.com]


Here's the full issue, for your reading pleasure (the double-page spread on pages 62-63) :
https://viewcomiconline.com/2001-a-space-odyssey-marvel-treasury-special-full/
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-08-11 7:06 PM
.

As Kirby's 106th birthday approaches in the next 2 weeks or so, here's an interesting paste-up of what might have been.

[Linked Image from i2.wp.com]

Kirby's first NEW GODS story was apparently planned at one point to first appear in a SHOWCASE issue.
https://viewcomiconline.com/the-new-gods-1971-issue-1/
And apparently this paste-up was prepared at least 6 months to a year in advance of that, because it includes the Silver Age "Superman, National Comics" logo in the upper left. that ceased to be used after Sept 1970. Kirby's first story for DC in that era was JIMMY OLSEN 133, Oct 1970, that was the first month the "National Comics" logo ceased to be used.

So that proposed SHOWCASE cover must have been prepared sometime prior to that even.
And NEW GODS 1 (Feb-Mar 1971) came out 4 months after JO 133.

Here also is a collection of unused Kirby covers, for both Marvel and DC, and some pre-code 1950's covers as well.
https://capnscomics.blogspot.com/2020/09/some-rejected-covers-by-jack-kirby.html
But the ones I am posting it for are the unused versions of JIMMY OLSEN 133, 135, 138, 141, 142, and 147.

Here you can see the Kirby JIMMY OLSEN covers (issues 133-139, 141-148) that were actually published.
https://www.mycomicshop.com/search?tid=180091&pgi=101

For comparison, I provided links to both the unused covers, and the ones used in the JIMMY OLSEN series. Incredibly, 6 rejected covers, out of only 15 Kirby issues.
Better yet, in a larger size, here are the complete issues of Kirby's JIMMY OLSEN 133-148 for your reading pleasure :
https://viewcomiconline.com/supermans-pal-jimmy-olsen-v1-133/
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-08-11 7:15 PM
.

And a link to a celebration of Kirby's 100th birthday posted awhile back, by some brother comics geeks (and Kirby aficionados) :
https://geekartgallery.blogspot.com/2017/08/link-round-up-jack-kirbys-100th-birthday.html
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-08-25 1:11 PM
.

[Linked Image from betweenthepagesblog.com]

From JIMMY OLSEN 147, with the character "Angry Charlie", one of the creatures genetically bred in the Evil Factory in previous issues,. he Evil Factory was blown up and destroyed in JO 146, but Angry Charlie and other creatures from it survived. Jimmy Olsen was recovering in a hospital room in the opening scene when Angry Charlie burst into the room. In the last few issues this wild bug-eyed monster met and made friends with the Newsboy Legion, and they more or less adopted him as a pet and at times fighting ally. Or as in this scene, a random threat that provides action in the scene.
https://onemillioncomics.com/supermans-pal-jimmy-olsen-v1-147/

Like so many other characters introduced, in the explosion of new characters Kirby created in JIMMY OLSEN, Angry Charlie was given limited space due to how many other characters were already in the series. But in the limited space he was given, interesting, and plenty of potential for expansion, maybe even into another series.
Along with The Wild Area, the Hairies, the Zoomway, the DNA Project, the new Newsboy Legion, the new Guardian, Dubbilex, a giant green renegade Jimmy Olsen clone, thousands more tiny Jimmy Olsen clones and Newsboy Legion clones, The Evil Factory, Dabney Donovan and his many research projects, the planet Transilvane, monsters around Loch Ness on the loose either created to protect the nearby Evil Factory, or just got loose from it, the seemingly endless range of mutant creatures shown in the Evil Factory's zoo in issues 145 and 146, and even after blowing up the evil factory, thousands of these could be used in future stories as having survived the explosion that destroyed it, as Jimmy Olsen survived. And in the last two issues, Angry Charlie and (patterned in a Jules Verne template) Victor Volcanum and all HIS gadgets and creations, expose yet another vast secret hidden world.

That's all just one 15-issue Kirby series, and not even a complete list of characters and worlds introduced !

Over at Marvel, a similar set of throwaway characters were expanded on and became the core of the Marvel Universe: the Inhumans,their city of Attilan, the Blue Area of the moon, the Watcher and his race, Galactus, the Silver Surfer, the Mad Thinker and his androids, "Him"/Warlock, Dr. Doom and his Latveria kingdom, the Microverse, Black Panther and Wakanda, the Sentry and the Kree empire, the Skrulls, Sub-Mariner and Atlantis, and that's just a small tip of the iceberg.

Like Angry Charlie, just a sample of the torrent of new characters and hidden worlds exploding out of any Kirby series.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-12-08 11:57 PM
Originally Posted by Wonder Boy
[Linked Image from comicvine.gamespot.com]

I love this photo of Kirby. It poses him as a guy of small stature, who achieves greatness through his art and imagination. Though the creator of many great pages and stories, the man himself, as posed, is vastly overshadowed by the work he created.


Updated, with new link.
I think this is the perfect photo of Kirby.
Posted By: Wonder Boy Re: JACK KIRBY: A tribute to the King... - 2023-12-19 7:25 AM
.

[Linked Image from animationmagazine.net]

One of many photos of Joe Simon and Jack Kirby together, during their lengthy collaborative years from 1941-1958. After the extreme comics industry recession and market collapse in comics when the Comics Code began in 1955, Joe Simon apparently decided at some point to break up the partnership and try his luck in advertising illustration.

[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]

While Kirby made attempts at working for just about every comics publisher remaining in the late 1950's, working for DC initially from 1956-1958, on SHOWCASE, CHALLENGERS OF THE UNKNOWN, HOUSE OF MYSTERY, HOUSE OF SECRETS, TALES OF THE UNEXPECTED, MY GREATEST ADVENTURE , and a Green Arrow backup series in WORLDS FINEST. Up till Kirby and editor Jack Schiff had a dispute over the "Sky Masters" newspaper strip, where Kirby sold it to a syndicate through Schiff's contacts, and then Schiff alleged Kirby shorted him on the compensation they agreed on. Schiff won the case when it went to court, and then Schiff blacklisted Kirby at DC and denied him further work after that, and Kirby did not return to DC until Schiff retired as editor there, and Kirby signed a contract to come back to DC literally the day Schiff left in 1970.

Kirby began doing the bulk of his work for Marvel in late 1958, and while not content at Marvel, he found the most work there. But also did work for Gilberton (CLASSICS ILLUSTRATED publisher) on their WORLD AROUND US series in issues 30-36, that Kirby found very tedious in the amount of historically accurate detail and art changes they demanded on the smallest of historical assignments.
At some point I learned that the reason Kirby suddenly found so much work at Marvel is that Stan Lee's primary and most prolific artist up to that time, Joe Maneely, suddenly died, and by chance Kirby approached Lee for work at precisely that time, and by arriving when he did, Kirby filled a huge void at Atlas/Marvel left by Maneely's death. Maneely apparently had very bad vision, and having lost his glasses one night, unable to see where he was going, fell between rail cars on the subway trying to get home.

In 1958-1959 between other work, Kirby did a last joint venture with Joe Simon, doing two brief series, ADVENTURES OF THE FLY, and
THE DOUBLE LIFE OF PRIVATE STRONG , both for Archie Comics.
https://viewcomiconline.com/the-double-life-of-private-strong-1/
https://viewcomiconline.com/the-fly-1959-issue-1/

And FIGHTING AMERICAN, previously 7 issues for Headline comics in 1954 , was partially reprinted in a a one-shot 1966 annual issue by Harvey (with some previously unpublished inventory stories.)

Also for Harvey, Kirby did a 3-issue series titled RACE FOR THE MOON, about astronauts in space, visually similar to Kirby's "Sky Masters" comic strip previously with Jack Schiff. Most interesting on a number of stories in these 3 issues, Kirby's pencils were finished by Al Williamson.
https://viewcomiconline.com/race-for-the-moon-1/

A few years later, Kirby did another one-shot issue in 1965, BLAST-OFF, that also had Kirby/Williamson art.
Despite producing an enormous amount of work for Marvel from 1958-1970, Kirby clearly was not content with his work situation a Marvel, and still produced a lot of other non-Marvel work, sampling the waters at just about every publisher during those years.



Joe Simon disappeared from comics for about a decade, then re-surfaced in 1968 with the notoriously awful BROTHER POWER THE GEEK 1 and 2, written by Simon, with art by some substandard artist I never heard of before or since, named Al Bare. Seeing is believing !
https://viewcomiconline.com/brother-power-the-geek-issue-1/

And then there was PREZ in 1973-1974 (scripted by Joe Simon, with Grandenetti art), that ran for 4 issues before being mercifully cancelled.
https://viewcomiconline.com/prez-1973-issue-1/

[Linked Image from recalledcomics.com]

Simon and Kirby briefly rejoined for what was initially a one-shot issue in 1974 on SANDMAN issue 1.
A year later, continued by Michael Fleisher and Ernie Chan, who did issues 2 and 3. (with Kirby covers)
Kirby later joined writer Michael Fleisher on SANDMAN in issues 4-6, and an unpublished issue 7, "The Seal Men's War on Santa Claus", , that finally saw print in BEST OF DC blue ribbon digest 22, a 100-page collection of Christmas stories, in 1982.
And in xerox form, in CANCELLED COMIC CAVALCADE (in KAMANDI 61).
https://viewcomiconline.com/the-sandman-1974-issue-1/
https://viewcomiconline.com/cancelled-comic-cavalcade-002/
https://offthebeatenpanel.blogspot.com/2013/12/hidden-gems-sandman-saves-christmas-in.html

Simon also did several new series tryouts in 1st ISSUE SPECIAL in 1975.
THE GREEN TEAM in issue 2 (Joe Simon, with Jerry Grandenettti art).
And THE OUTSIDERS in issue 10 (again scripted by Simon, with Grandenetti / Flessell art)..
https://viewcomiconline.com/1st-issue-special-issue-2/
https://viewcomiconline.com/1st-issue-special-issue-10/
GREEN TEAM also had two more issues by the same creators that were never published, and ended up in CANCELLED COMIC CAVALCADE after the DC Implosion in 1978.
https://viewcomiconline.com/cancelled-comic-cavalcade-001/

Simon's work from 1968-1978 all lands squarely in the "so bad it's good" category.
But it has an odd charm to it.


But back in the day, in the 1940's and 1950's, the Simon / Kirby team were among the most sought-after comics creators.
And Jack Kirby, soon after the Simon & Kirby partnership ended , famously began his long collaboration with Stan Lee, and arguably both did the most acclaimed work of their careers on FF, THOR, HULK, AVENGERS, X-MEN, SGT FURY AND HIS HOWLING COMMANDOS, NICK FURY AGENT OF SHIELD, a revived CAPTAIN AMERICA series, and a ton of other new characters at Marvel.
© RKMBs