Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 11 12
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
Quote:

britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
we did save europe, you just jealous.




Precisely how? Give details, and bear in mind that "Saving Private Ryan" isn't a fucking documentary.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
arms, soldiers, intelligence, the list goes on and on......

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
even russian historians admit had the russian winter not been as fierce as it was they were done for with the forces germany had amassed, but you french comment shows you are not serious so i assume you really agree you just bored.....

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
The Russian winter wouldn't have been an issue if the German army hadn't invaded Russia, rather than finishing the job elsewhere in Europe properly. Whether it was German incompetence or Russian bile, it had fuck all to do with America.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
your waffling further proves my US envy point, you dont know wether it was the russian army, the germans incompetance, not sure what it was just that it wasnt the US.

this was too easy.....

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
on a side not just to educate the less fortunate like yourself D., you do know there was a reason behind the urgent push to russia dont you? it wasnt a hey lets stretch ourselves thin category. german desperately needed manufacturing and raw materials that russia possesed to conter the LARGE influx of weapons and supplies from the US and Canada....i know with you envy troubles you prolly dont get much time to read so i thought id pass that along....

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.




Good lord, you are a fucking idiot. Eject now.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
If you'd made a point coherently that might be true.
You haven't, so it obviously isn't.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
ill take that as a admission.....

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
Quote:

MisterJLA said:
Good lord, you are a fucking idiot. Eject now.




Prove me wrong, then.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
i just proved it , hell the history books proved it, you envy of the US has blinded you.....

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
No you haven't. You'll still claim you've won this argument, though (just like America has won every war it's been involved in since the 'Forties), because I can't be arsed with this anymore.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
and again america wins!

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Quote:

MisterJLA said:
Good lord, you are a fucking idiot. Eject now.




Prove me wrong, then.




"Despite deep-seated mistrust and hostility between the Soviet Union and the Western democracies, Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 created an instant alliance between the Soviets and the two greatest powers in what the Soviet leaders had long called the "imperialist camp": Britain and the United States. Three months after the invasion, the United States extended assistance to the Soviet Union through its Lend-Lease Act of March 1941. Before September 1941, trade between the United States and the Soviet Union had been conducted primarily through the Soviet Buying Commission in the United States.

Lend-Lease was the most visible sign of wartime cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union. About $11 billion in war matériel was sent to the Soviet Union under that program. Additional assistance came from U.S. Russian War Relief (a private, nonprofit organization) and the Red Cross. About seventy percent of the aid reached the Soviet Union via the Persian Gulf through Iran; the remainder went across the Pacific to Vladivostok and across the North Atlantic to Murmansk. Lend- Lease to the Soviet Union officially ended in September 1945. Joseph Stalin never revealed to his own people the full contributions of Lend-Lease to their country's survival, but he referred to the program at the 1945 Yalta Conference saying, "Lend-Lease is one of Franklin Roosevelt's most remarkable and vital achievements in the formation of the anti-Hitler alliance."

Lend-Lease matériel was welcomed by the Soviet Union, and President Roosevelt attached the highest priority to using it to keep the Soviet Union in the war against Germany. Nevertheless, the program did not prevent friction from developing between the Soviet Union and the other members of the anti-Hitler alliance. The Soviet Union was annoyed at what seemed to it to be a long delay by the allies in opening a "second front" of the Allied offensive against Germany. As the war in the east turned in favor of the Soviet Union, and despite the successful Allied landings in Normandy in 1944, the earlier friction intensified over irreconcilable differences about postwar aims within the anti-Axis coalition. Lend-Lease helped the Soviet Union push the Germans out of its territory and Eastern Europe, thus accelerating the end of the war. With Stalin's takeover of Eastern Europe, the wartime alliance ended, and the Cold War began. "

http://lcweb.loc.gov/exhibits/archives/worw.html

...


"North and South Atlantic Routes - During WWII, the Soviet Union received almost 15,000 U.S. built aircraft under the Lend-Lease program. About half of these were delivered by sea via the North Atlantic or were flown across the South Atlantic Ocean to the U.S.S.R. via North Africa. Each method was difficult.

The North Atlantic route was subject to attack by German submarines and aircraft and the African route suffered from exposure to desert sand which reduced the life of engines and other aircraft components. Eventually aircraft deliveries shifted to a more direct course via Alaska to Siberia, the ALSIB route.

ALSIB Route - Almost 8,000 aircraft were ferried over the ALSIB route, usually by Air Transport Command pilots, through Great Falls, Montana to Fairbanks, Alaska. There, Soviet pilots took over and flew the aircraft to Nome, Alaska and then to Siberia.

Winter ground temperatures of minus 50º Fahrenheit, the threat of being forced down in remote wilderness, hazardous flying weather, spartan living conditions, and a lack of sufficient hangar space which sometimes forced mechanics to work outside under cruel winter conditions made life difficult for personnel assigned to duty along the ALSIB route.

Neither the Red Army Museum in Moscow nor the Soviet Air Force Museum makes any mention of Soviet use of American aircraft during WWII or that the Western Allies even participated in that war. This is even more interesting when comparing a P-63 flight manual page from the Soviet version and the American original."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/wwii/ce39.htm

11 billion dollars, 15,000 aircraft and a second front didn't help the Soviets? If you say so.

By the way, many French only collaberated with the Germans.

"Although plausible as a theory, it doesn't stand up against the evidence. Firstly, protecting France against the full barbarity of Nazi rule implies an awareness on the part of Vichy of Nazi policy. It is possible to argue that Vichy's understanding of Nazi policy was limited. The actions of Vichy, predicated on the victory of Germany in an essentially European war, expresses a blinkered view of the dynamics of Nazism. The Germany of 1940, thought many in Vichy, was little different to the Germay with whom they had agreed an armistice in 1918.

Moreover, the argument that Vichy collaboration prevented France from becoming another Poland is similarly unfounded. The `polonization' of certain sections of the French community took place, and took place, more importantly, with the complicity of the French authorities. The deportation of 75,000-80,000 Jews, the forced dispatch of 750,000 Frenchmen and Frenchwomen to work in Germany, the trials of 135,000 French people, the internment of 70,000 `enemies of the state', the complicity of the French police and the Milice in suppressing resistance are all examples of this. There was no shielding or moderating influence here.

Comparisons with other occupied countries in Europe underline the specificity of the French experience. In the Netherlands, for example, civil servants were only expected to ensure the proper functionning of essential services and not to provide any other assistance to the occupying forces.

Vichy not only facilitated and assisted in Nazi atrocities, but it also exploited France's military defeat to construct its own internal political revolution. This makes Vichy France, with the possible exception of Croatia and Slovakia, newly created states, a specific case in occupied Europe."




http://www.sunderland.ac.uk/~os0tmc/occupied/collab.htm




Try opening a book once in while.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
D's reply,"yeah but!"

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"The cost of the Lend-Lease program has been calculated at between $42 and $50 billion in both goods and services. Great Britain and its dominions received about half of this aid, with the Soviet Union getting the second largest share, estimated at $11 billion. Free France, led by de Gaulle, received about $3.5 billion and China more than $2 billion. In all, more than 40 nations benefited from Lend-Lease aid.

Was Lend-Lease a success? Most would agree it was, especially in the case of Great Britain, where the aid was greatly appreciated and recognized. In 1944, America provided the British with over one-quarter of their military equipment. However, the role of Lend-Lease to the Soviet Union is less clear, and little recognized by the Soviets, despite the incredible quantity of supplies involved.

In addition to almost 15,000 aircraft, most fighters or bombers, Russia received over 400,000 motor vehicles, many being medium or heavy military trucks. American-built trucks and other vehicles made up 60 percent of the Soviet’s total vehicle fleet by 1945. In addition, America supplied 2,000 locomotives 11,000 freight cars and 540,000 tons of rail for Soviet railroads. Late in the war, Stalin did make some public statements praising the American aid received under Lend-Lease, but after the defeat of Nazi Germany, Americans began to grow wary of their Soviet ally. Plans to continue Lend-Lease as part of a post-war reconstruction program died with Roosevelt, as the new president Harry Truman ended all Lend-Lease aid on Aug. 15, 1945 – the day the Japanese surrendered.

Truman demanded that the Soviets repay the U.S. for many non-military supplies, including cargo ships, worth more than $2.5 billion. The Cold War that followed effectively ended any such hopes of repayment, until it finally thawed in the late 1980s with the outbreak of glasnost. In June of 1990, to qualify for U.S. loans and credits under the still active Johnson Debt-Default Act, Russia negotiated an agreement for repayment of her WWII debts.

http://www.rwebs.net/dispatch/output.asp?ArticleID=56

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
D.? oh D.?

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
French collaberation with the Nazis was a better help to the Allied cause than American military, and economic aid.

-D. McDonaldough

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/amh/AMH-22.htm

Quote:

Unlike in World War I, when the United States had come late on the scene and provided only those forces to swing the balance of power to the Allied side, the American contribution to the reconquest of Western Europe had been predominant, not just in manpower but as a true arsenal of democracy. American factories produced for the British almost three times more lend-lease materials than for the Russians, including 185,000 vehicles, 12,000 tanks, and enough planes to equip four tactical air forces, and for the French, all weapons and equipment for 8 divisions and 1 tactical air force, plus partial equipment for 3 more divisions.






Quote:

As V-E Day came, Allied forces in Western Europe consisted of 4 ½ million men, including 9 armies (5 of them American—one of which, the Fifteenth, saw action only at the last), 23 corps, 91 divisions (61 of them American), 6 tactical air commands (4 American), and 2 strategic air forces (1 American). The Allies had 28,000 combat aircraft, of which 14,845 were American, and they had brought into Western Europe more than 970,000 vehicles and 18 million tons of supplies. At the same time they were achieving final victory in Italy with 18 divisions (7 of them American).







Last edited by britneyspearsatemyshorts; 2004-04-21 9:40 PM.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.



Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734



oh this was easy!

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Offline
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Quote:

MisterJLA said:
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.






Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Offline
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,236
Likes: 15
Quote:

britneyspearsatemyshorts said:
Quote:

MisterJLA said:
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.









Joined: May 2003
Posts: 188
100+ posts
Offline
100+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 188
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.






A nother F ucking L ame A ss C lown posts a message.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,820
Rob Offline
cobra kai
15000+ posts
Offline
cobra kai
15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,820
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.




wow.

thats new.


giant picture
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
1 post
Offline
1 post
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
I suppose your are one of those whackos that go by history?

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
Quote:

D. McDonagh said:
Are you seriously suggesting that the Russians wouldn't have been able to deal with the problem without your lot turning up late to take all the credit?
The fucking French contributed more to the collapse of the German war effort than America ever did.




Lend-Lease? RAF Eagle Squadron? Millions upon millions in loans we've been courteous enough not to call for fifty years? Okay, so Britain was all by itself for a year and a half, two years at the most. The US entered late, but I seriously doubt the UK would have held out for another year. There's absolutely no effective logical argument you can make to support such a claim.

Hell, whomod has far better common sense than to make claims like that. (Just an example, whomod. )


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,289
2000+ posts
Offline
2000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,289
Churchill's strategy was basically hold out until he could persuade the US to come on board, which in the end Japan did for him.

If Japan had kept out of it then the US may ne ver have entered the conflict (although FDR wanted to, he was unable to get sufficient support) and Hitler probably would have won.

Pissing off Russia didn't help Hitler either.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,011
Likes: 31
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,011
Likes: 31
I see D McDonaugh is still spouting the same historical innacuracies he did a month ago:

Nearly 200 Killed in Madrid Explosion topic
http://www.rkmbs.com/Number=251436

I recall having a discussion with Chant (arguably the sanest and most polite liberal on these boards) who was saying (in the "It's not about oil or Iraq..." topic a few pages back,
http://www.rkmbs.com/Number=239307 ) how he learned in school that the U.S. was "responsible" for the whole world getting nuclear weapons.
Whereas the truth is that Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan and Israel acquired nuclear weapons while allies of the U.S., who had/have good relations with the U.S., and were not pressured in any way to get nukes, they just wanted them.
And once again, it chills me to the bone what people are taught about the United States. All these countries were pursuing nukes on their own, independent of U.S. action. Only Russia could be said to have defensively pursued nukes because the U.S. did.

Time and again, it seems that, contrary to history, there is a tendency to heap blame for all that is wrong in the world on the United States.
And give little if any credit to the U.S. for what it has done right.

I'm certainly not blind to what the U.S. has done wrong, such as the slaughter of the American Indian (being part Cherokee), slavery, robber-barons of the industrial revolution, Klan activity from 1865-1965, CIA coups in the Middle East and Central/South America to create dictatorships friendly to the U.S. during the Cold War, misguided policy in Vietnam, misguided policy in pre-1979 Iran, pulling out of Beirut in 1983, supporting dictatorships in Nicaragua, in the Phillipines, and in Panama, abandoning the Kurds and Shi'ites to their slaughter in 1991, after encouraging them to rebellion, and many other military/diplomatic/humanitarian mis-steps.

But the U.S., for all its flaws, has arguably done more good and less evil than any government in history.

I'd just like to see the U.S. get a little credit for the good it's done.

There is plenty to legitimately criticize the United States for, without misrepresentative history and wild conspiracy theories.

And often in retrospective of history, regarding the many decisions the U.S. is endlessly brow-beaten over for not having made the right choice about, the truth is, there often isn't any right political choice. Just the least potentially damaging of several bad options.

Everyone looks to the U.S. for aid, leadership, and military action in a crisis. And then hates us for doing so.
Hated if we do, hated if we don't.

Bosnia, Haiti, Somalia, Kosovo, Rwanda, Panama ...and Iraq.

The U.S. provides huge amounts of aid to Russia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and others.
And more broad humanitarian/economic aid to virtually all third-world nations of Asia, Africa, and across Central and South America.

I'm not expecting grattitude voiced anytime soon. But a lot of people worldwide have benefitted from and appreciate American aid. They're just generally not as vocal.

I'm thinking in particular of William Stout's three-page story "Shoes", from of DC's benefit book, 9-11:VOLUME 1.

I hold the U.S. accountable for the mistakes it's made, and would like our government to make good in correcting those mistakes (and I think it often has).
But I'm also very proud of the good that the United States has done in the world. And continues to do, with or without appreciation.

--------------------


"This Man, This Wonder Boy..."


Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,205
fudge
4000+ posts
Offline
fudge
4000+ posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,205
Arguably?



Well, to be more precise, we were taught that it could be argued that the US. is responsible for the spreading of Nukes, not that it actually IS, but it's all good, I think no one would prefer the alternative, with Hitler getting them first.

I agree, Dave, one should look for the faults in ones own country before pointing out others. Or as I like to say, sweep before your own door first!

Besides, the anti-americanism isn't really all that widespread as some people would like to think, or claim.

The same thing about people all over the world accusing my own nation of being full of rascism

Sure, we have rascists, what country doesn't?

Sure, there is an ongoing debate about refugees, and it has gotten quite ugly, but the refugees referred to are people who are "fleeing" because their nation is poor and they want to get a job in a rich country.

Yikes....got a little off-topic there.

But really, the anti-americanism isn't really that bad, mostly people are saying "WE HATE AMERICA" and then they go home for tea, or coffee or whatever.. They may say they hate america, but they really don't. Some do, but mostly it's just people who don't know how to argue their case in a constructive way, and so they do the "hate thing"




Racks be to MisterJLA
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
The Portland, Ore., branch of the Independent Media Center has a page devoted to the death in combat last week of Pat Tillman, the pro football player turned Army Ranger who died in combat in Afghanistan last week.

The page begins with the headline "Dumb Jock Killed in Afghanistan." This is followed by reader comments. A sampling (quoted verbatim except for expletives):

    Tillman chose to go to Afghanistan. He's partially reponsible for the deaths of hundreds, maybe thousands of Afghan civilians. No need to feel sorry for him, other than feeling bad that he was brainwashed into serving as a grunt."


    "it's amazing the kind of attention this insignificant incident is going to cause. well, he was rich, white, and an american. 10,000 (brown) iraqis get killed, and it barely merits a mention in the american news. how utterly f---ing sad."


    "To be honest I wish I could feel sorry for the guy, but the truth is I really feel nothing at all. To many have died and too much money has flowed into the pockets of Dick Cheney to even worry about it."


    "if he 'sacrificed' anything it was his common sense. He had a good American thing going and blew it."


In fairness, not all posters agree. "I'd like to correct the ridiculous headline that preceeds this story," writes one: "Brave American sacrifices friends, family and fortune in defense of his country. Pigs on IndyMedia can now continue to exercise free speech, sacrifice nothing and spew hate."

But I don't think that last poster is a liberal.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Offline
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
Jesus, that's an ugly headline.


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
10000+ posts
Offline
10000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
I do think it's somewhat sad that the death of Pat Tillman has received so much coverage when thousands of other Americans and Iraquis are also dying(especially since it wouldn't be what Pat Tillman would have wanted), but to call him a "dumb jock" is ridiculous and completely insensitive.


MisterJLA is RACKing awesome.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Offline
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 1
Yes it is, especially to his family and friends. And, least of all, its also stupid. You're not going to convert people to your argument if you call someone who was killed in combat a "dumb jock". His death should be mourned as a senseless waste, not as the conclusion to the life of a "dumb jock".


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Quote:

Animalman said:
I do think it's somewhat sad that the death of Pat Tillman has received so much coverage when thousands of other Americans and Iraquis are also dying(




How often does a pro athlete voluntarily leave a lucrative sports career to join the military?

Of course it would get coverage.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
The left is prone to apoplectic fits when you question their patriotism, or call them America-haters.

Then why do they keep posting things like the Tillman attack (cited above) and this thread at Democratic Underground: If by ‘America’ you mean the majority living here now, then I hate America.

The discussion is kicked off by someone seeking counseling from his peers. Should he stay or should he go (now)?

    If by “America” you mean the vision of the Founding Fathers, then I love America. But it’s hard to keep that vision in front of me when the majority of “Americans” are fundamentalist, fascistic, homophobic, racist, sexist, ignorant, American Idol-loving morons who think Bush is a strong leader. I think that the America I love is beyond retrieval because it would take more than a new President, it would take a re-awakening of a whole group of stupid people who don’t want re-awakening. Bush didn’t destroy America. Americans who had no idea of the wonderful country they were given destroyed America, and will continue to destroy it whether Kerry is elected or not.


To which one helpful DU gentleman chimes in:

    If chimpy gets selected again, we’re all in big trouble. The fascists you describe will start doing more than just voting, the “brownshirts” will be coming after people. And the people like us will oppose them with whatever means necessary. It’ll then get ugly, real ugly.


Can we question their patriotism yet?

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Offline
terrible podcaster
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,801
Let 'em bitch. They'll mope a while, then toke up a few times, and once they've mellowed out, they'll go to work and bag your groceries as always. It's always completely inconsequential people who have things like that to say.


go.

ᴚ ᴀ ᴐ ᴋ ᴊ ᴌ ᴧ
ಠ_ಠ
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
10000+ posts
Offline
10000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
Quote:

the G-man said:
How often does a pro athlete voluntarily leave a lucrative sports career to join the military?

Of course it would get coverage.




That wasn't the point. Yes, it would get coverage...I'm saying Pat Tillman didn't want coverage, as evidenced by his refusal to do interviews before or during his training, and the reason was because he didn't view what he was giving up as anything more than what the hundreds of thousands of other men and women in the army were.


MisterJLA is RACKing awesome.
Page 3 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 11 12

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5