if you were eating ham and it fell through a crack in space/time would you forget all ham or just that particular ham? and if you had eaten most of the ham would you remember the part you ate-and therefore remember making a smaller piece-or would you forget the whole meal and feel very hungry?
Ray, you are more retarded than I thought. You replies actually make no sense at all, and you are still saying that I am not allowed to come to a thread for something I like, and say bad things about it.
Fuck off, you San Fran faggot, you have all the worst traits of the likes of Snarf, Rex, G-Man and the Insurgents all rolled into one.
Now isnt it about time you ran crying from these boards again?
I'm starting to try my hand at writing Doctor Who slash fiction now, but I'm a bit lacking with accuracy, since I haven't watched majority of the important eps. Is it possible for the tenth doctor to go back in time so that he can have anal sex with the fifth doctor, and the fucking would be so hard that the fifth doctor would be destroyed in the process, achieving orgasm and regeneration at the same time?
Watched 'In Bruge' last night. Going through the deleted scenes, I realized that Matt Smith was playing the younger version of Ralph Fiennes's character.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Watched 'In Bruge' last night. Going through the deleted scenes, I realized that Matt Smith was playing the younger version of Ralph Fiennes's character.
You fucking retract that bit about my cunt fucking kids!
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
What's a fifty year old lollipop man doing, knowing fucking Karate? What was he, a Chinese lollipop man?
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
I'm starting to try my hand at writing Doctor Who slash fiction now, but I'm a bit lacking with accuracy, since I haven't watched majority of the important eps. Is it possible for the tenth doctor to go back in time so that he can have anal sex with the fifth doctor, and the fucking would be so hard that the fifth doctor would be destroyed in the process, achieving orgasm and regeneration at the same time?
Yes.
And it would, in effect, explain why the Sixth Doctor was so pissy...
Weird Episode. I liked it. But it tugged to hard on my heart strings. I prefer to remain cold and uncaring.
I liked it as well. Tony Curran did a hell of a job as van Gogh. Really good story where the monster was just secondary.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
I also liked the bit about Amy being from Holland because Curran also has a Scottish accent.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
Excellent episode! Loved seeing Bill Nighy up in the mix. As Roy-Knot said, I prefer to remain detached. However, since Smith is already such a reserved Doctor, I like that they went there this episode. It never felt too much for me. But, it might have been the acting, I don't know. Thought it was, in the emotional sense, a strange successor to both The Unquiet Dead with Dickens, and Rose going back in time to see her dad in Father's Day. Damn good.
Next week though....hmmmm....not sure what to make of that preview. Is it Love and Monsters II?
You won't be banned because according to the FAQ, your erection will be unnoticeable.
Quote:
FAQ How are they sent out?
All the full sized cardboard cutouts fold in half for easy storage. They are printed all in one piece, so there's no split, and you'd be hard pressed to notice once they're erected.
Shit, it even encourages me to prop it up a wall and fuck it.
Quote:
Can I wall mount them?
The easel at the rear is glued on, but can be fairly easily be removed or left folded back, so you can wall mount them if you wish.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
I enjoyed this episode. I like that for a change they chose to track down something strange instead of just happening upon it as they pretty much always do. I'm also enjoying the use of time travel in this series and loving the Tardis set more and more each episode.
Next week though....hmmmm....not sure what to make of that preview. Is it Love and Monsters II?
That's what I was thinking until he opened the door and the Doctor was there. So I don't think it'll be a Doctor-light episode as we've had previously. I think they just cut the trailer to seem that way so the Doctor appreciating the man's "I love you" would serve as a better punchline. Personally though I enjoyed Love and Monsters. it was a novel idea and at that point hadn't really been done.
I loved Elton and L.I.N.D.A., as well. Not Peter Kay in the goofy latex, of course. That was horrible. The only thing that makes me pause about next week's is that a Doctor-lite would seem to hinge on the guest-actors being able to hold the piece together. But, I hope you are right, and I am wrong...
yeah the guy seemed really gay (maybe it's just a fat Brit thing) but I remember they always would be very upfront about Doctor-lite episodes. I seriously doubt either of those two can handle an episode like Elton or Sally Sparrow.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
It has been posted several times but it's a great bit and always fun to watch. It's actually a really solid parody and not just an SNL type skit. Also (as has been mentioned a hundred times by now) it's Moffet's first Doctor Who story.
Has anyone heard about Amy? Rumors on the interweb say she's gagged in some fanboy's basement.
