Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1214751 2014-10-15 2:04 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
OP Offline
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951
Likes: 6
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2...ml#incart_river

Seriously. There's no rehabilitation. There's no point in keeping him locked up for the rest of his life. Best thing you could do for this boy and the victim's family is just euthanize him like a rabid dog

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,005
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,005
Likes: 29
Y'know, I've thought a few times in the recent past, that the elites in our courts decide to try and rehabilitate maniacs like this. When in saner times, if courts wouldn't do so, the people would rise up as a mob and take out someone like this, so they'd never have had the opportunity to kill again.

There is so much crime and cultural destruction that goes unpunished now, that as a society, when we were a more unified and moral people, we simply would not have tolerated.
More than that, our society increasingly rewards and coddles bad behavior, and punishes good and moral behavior. That seems to be the guiding principle of liberalism.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,005
Likes: 29
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Offline
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,005
Likes: 29
 Quote:
An autopsy found blunt force trauma to the woman's neck, leading to the homicide finding.

The prosecutor said the crime of criminal homicide is excluded from juvenile law, requiring that the boy be charged as an adult.

"The family is obviously an emotional wreck to have their 10-year-old removed from them and to know he is in a county correctional facility charged as an adult," [the boy's attorney] Brown said.


I'd imagine the kid's own family, that reported the crime, recognizes this kid is even a threat to them. And that while they feel sadness over his incarceration, they at least did not cover up for a killer, and enable him to kill more people.
Would that the court had less sympathy for the kid, and more concern for the woman he killed, and the people he will kill in the future, if given the chance.

Are we now "too civilized" to kill a killer?

I've never understood the defense of "mentally unfit to stand trial". Whether the person had full cold-blooded premeditation, or killed someone in a moment of rage, or delusion, they still present the same murderous threat to people around them. And perhaps mentally "unfit" people are even more dangerous, because they can kill unexpectedly, without the normal predictable triggers that could be anticipated would escalate to violence.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5