Wow. The point went right over your head didn't it?
Considering how often you've gone out of your way to argue that land, capital, and legacies are somehow communally amassed commodities that should logically be taxed and controlled by the state--rather than privately developed properties that should be controlled by the individual proprietors--any claim you make about rightful ownership sounds less than convincing.
Not all of the Founding Fathers agreed with the Boston Tea Party, and even went so far as to condemn Revere and Co. for defying the British authority, but that doesn't make defiance against the taxation and fees of out-of-touch leadership any less of an American tradition. Ranchers are getting FUCKED in more ways than one by regulations that are inherently anti-private property. The worst of the offenses committed against them and their families is the death tax: it hits them far harder than anyone else. The particulars of this incident do not strike me as being a far cry from those cases.
In which case, it's simplistic and plain silly to try and compare this to the Occutards who had nary a fucking clue as to why they even bothered flocking to the streets like a bunch of idiots and destroying small businesses in the process.
