Actually, that's precisely the point. That no one should have to pay it.
That Eminent Domain and Agenda 21 are intrusive on individual Constitutional freedoms, and should be abolished.
I admit that I haven't followed this very closely but isn't this property that Bundy doesn't, in fact, own and never did?
If so:
- 1. Why shouldn't he have to pay rent?
2. What does eminent domain, which involves the taking of private property by the government and not taking public property by the individual, have to do with it?
