OFF CAMERA, TO REPORTER: "You're a reporter. Are you working for the American people or some other entity?"
REPORTER: "I'm a Mexican American."
The reporter is pretty up front that he's working as a foreign national (a Mexican, with a non-objective anti-American agenda) against the interest of simply reporting the news.
Even so, they respectfully had a dialogue with him, and dealt with the Mexican-American reporter in a non-threatening manner, and after gave the opinion BASED ON THE REPORTER'S OWN STATED BIAS, that he does not deserve the Constitutional rights he has, based on his un-American first loyalty.
And basically, they just stated that they personally wouldn't cooperate with him in his biased spin of the news, but otherwise did not obstruct or threaten him in any way.
It looked to me like they had a very Constitution-conscious dialogue with him, and with remarkable politeness, pointed out that he was acting as a foreign national, against the Constitutional/national interest.
