Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Quote:
The facts remain: WikiLeaks got the e-mails from inside the DNC somewhere. And pending other sources, that could have been Seth Rich....


How is that a fact WB? Our intelligence agency don't agree with what your declaring a fact.
Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution


That DNI (combined CIA, FBI, NSA ) report never once mentions Seth Rich, and is a rabbit hole diversion from what I said about Seth Rich. It never once addresses Seth Rich's death or his possible WikiLeaks disclosure of DNC internal e-mails. The report only expresses a general preference by the Russians for Trump winning because of Putin's grudge against Hillary Clinton, for Clinton's interference in Russian politics in 2011. And since Hillary Clinton lost the election and the Russian plan was to discredit Hillary Clinton as a sitting president, it doesn't have any relevance to the true situation. The Russians expected Hillary to win! Obviously she didn't, so the Russian schemes, whatever their intent, ultimately came to nothing.

It's a fact that Seth Rich was killed.
It's a fact that the official police explanation that Rich's death was a "robbery" when he was not missing anything is not a logical explanation.
It is a fact that Seth Rich expressed disillusionment with the DNC, and could have been motivated to disclose the e-mails to WikiLeaks.