No. The fact that the liberal media will give it so much repetition is why he responded. He sued to prevent its release on the grounds that it is maliciously untrue. If it's 90% salaciously false and 10% true, or 80/20, or 70/30, can it honestly be held up by the media as "true", or even "mostly true"?
The TRUTH is, they are clinging to a salacious book from a historically dishonest author, because it potentially damages a president they don't like. Because they, like the author, are dishonest in their reporting on it.
