So are we glad this is getting investigated? Is there an argument that it shouldn't be?
I ALWAYS support investigation, and following the facts impartially, wherever they lead. My only reservation is the Democrat one-sidedness that holds Republicans to a high standard while wanting to sweep any allegations about Democrats under a rug.
Democrats who vilify Republicans for the slightest whiff of an allegation, while giving a total free pass to the PROVEN allegations against Democrat officials.
The contrast between media coverage of the simultaneous Herman Cain and Anthony Weiner scandals being a prime example. Where, as detailed by Media Research Center, there was never any evidence about the Herman Cain allegations, and all allegations against Weiner were absolutely proven with photo and text messages. But there were twice as many stories written about the Herman Cain allegations. And the media WOULD NOT EVEN REPORT the Weiner allegations until there was evidence, but conversely had an eagerness to report every half-baked rumor about Cain.
Again:
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton (who built her career by publicly destroying the women Bill Clinton abused, to ruthlessly advance her own career)
Rep Gerry Studds.
Ted Kennedy
JFK
RFK
To name just a few.
Still waiting for Democrats to hold these political leaders to the same standard.
