No. Because it is NOT a hysterical or hyperbolic comparison.
The Left DOES utilize the tactics of intimidation and, when in positions of power, state authoritarianism to advance their ideological goals.
As I've quoted often, mostly from Buchanan, the Democrat/Left in the U.S. is likewise deeply influenced by Soviet infiltration, revolution and propaganda tactics. In many cases, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Valerie Jarret's parents, Communist Party USA, William Ayers, the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers, for example, were
directly funded front groups of the Soviet Union.
I recently read that Russia now has a worldwide spy/infiltration/propaganda network running that actually exceeds that of the former Soviet Union. And no doubt, are directly funding front groups in the U.S. just as they did then. I wouldn't be at all surprised if MediaMatters, CodePink, MoveOn.org, Center For American Progress, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, and AntiFa all turned out to be on that payroll.
Your side shouts down opposition to silence them (Karl Rove, Ann Coulter, Milo Yiannopoulos, Condolleezza Rice and many other conservatives at universities and booksignings nationwide have been silenced by these Marxist/Nazi tactics). They (Antifa and the Democrat/Left) violently attacked people peacefully protesting in Charlottesville, 90% of whom were peaceful defenders of just preserving a Robert E. Lee statue and history, a protest hijacked and diverted by a handful of racist supremacists.) How is the Antifa/Left violence and intimidation NOT manifesting the precise tactics of the Nazis? Far from hyperbolic.
As with the zealots of Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, or Ho Chi Minh, terror, arson, murder, anything that serves the revolution is good. That is precisely what we are seeing in the increasingly angry militant intolerance of the Democrat/Left the last few years.
