What is this "Spanky" shit? What the hell does it even mean?

Regardless, the 7 Comey memos (which still are not disclosed to the public, and I think Deven Nunes is the only one on the record who had fully read them, unredacted, which means even the Democrats who haave accused Trump of "collusion" (whatever non-crime that entails, collusion is not a proseccutaable crime). While not fully disclosed publicly, Comey acknowledges details that Trump has not coordinated with the Russians, and the prosecution should be winding down to a close at this point.

And AGAIN, there is plenty of evidence of
1) the Hillary Clinton campaign speaking directly with Russian agents in their commissioned "Russia Dossier" through former British agent Christopher Steele. And how that dossier was used to smear Trump with allegations that even Comey and McCabe described as "salacious" and "unreliable". Even as they used it as the core "evidence" to request a FISA surveillance on Carter Page and other Trump campaign staffers. FOUR TIMES!
Not to mention criminal actions that warrant prosecution of Hillary Clinton and her staff for the
2) Uranium One deal selling 20% of U.S. uranium in exchange for donations and huge speaking fees for both Bill and Hillary.
And
3) the "pay-to-play" receipt of hundreds of millions in donations to the Clinton Foundation, where they would then contact the State Department and give foreign donors access to State Department officials, during Hillary Clinton's four years as secretary of state.
And
4) Hillary Clinton and her staffers erasing 33,000 e-mails, and bleach-bit wiping the momory of their computer hard-drives, and smashing ceveral cel-phones with a hammer to hide the self-incriminating evidence of 1), 2), and 3) above. >>>>AFTER<<<<< all these were subpoenaed as evidence by FBI, DOJ and Congress investigators.
WHY WERE PAUL MANAFORT, MICHAEL FLYNN, and CARTER PAGE SUBJECT TO MIDNIGHT RAIDS, who DIDN'T DESTROY EVIDENCE, WHILE HILLARY CLINTON, CHERYL MILLS, HUMA ABEDIN AND JENNIFER PALMIERI WERE NOT SUBJECT TO SIMILAR RAIDS, WHO >>>DID DESTROY EVIDENCE?

Clearly the FBI and DOJ were heavily invested in exonerating Hillary, and in lynching Trump and his staff any way they could. As is abundantly clear in the internal messages and actions of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein (and his wife who received an over $500,000 through Hillary Clinton operative McAuliffe), Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr (whose wife worked for Fusion GPS and fed false information directly to the FBI and DOJ through her husband's inside status), Andrew Weissman (who attended Hillary Clinton's election night victory party, that urned defeat, and praised acting AG Sally Yates for her defiance of Trump's immigration restrictions). And of course Robert Meuller, who stacked his "neutral" special investigation with Democrats, 13 of 17, and 11 of 17 are known Democrat donors, some in the tens of thousands.

and
5) the REAL treason, Hillary Clinton's private e-mail server, that compromised U.S. national intelligence every day Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, leaving every internal communication at the highest level with Pentagon, State Department and White House officials, ripe for the hacking by the Russians and Chinese, giving them knowledge in real time the speed of communication and internal strategy of every move our military and executive leadership made. If that's not treason, I don't know what is. Whether you term it as the federally prosecutable "gross negligence" or as Comey attempted to soften it in 2016 to let Hillary off the hook, "carelessness". By either name, it is treason.


All this evidence is ripe for the prosecution of Hillary.
But instead the smokescreen of alleged "collusion" by Trump, without a shred of evidence, goes on. And the liberal media feeds the lie by focusing only on the false allegations against Trump.