You keep trying to push that lying propaganda talking point. But Obama was in office for 8 years, not 20 months. The economy grew during part of Obama's presidency, but in more than the first 2 years of Obama's 8 years our country continued to hemmorage jobs in the millions. Obama's people called 1% to 2% annual growth "the new normal", team Obama could not even imagine 3 or 4% growth that Trump has accomplished and maintained for 2 years, so it is ridiculous to try and give Obama credit for 4% growth under Trump.
It is a fact that the stockmarket cratered even deeper after Obama won the 2008 election, and that millions more jobs were lost oij the months after Obama was elected AND inaugurated. That reflects that people who knew the market best were not optimistic about the business friendliness of Obama's economic policy.
It is also a fact that the opposite happened when Trump was elected in 2016. After some initial "the sky is falling" rhetoric by Paul Krugman and the DNC propagandists at CNN and elswhere in the media to try and saabotage Trump, the market in fact rose at the prospect of Trump's economic policy, and continued to rise after his inauguration.
Trump has seen the best economic performance since 2000. Last time I checked, that was 8 years before Obama took office. It is smoke-and-mirrors logic to try and argue that 20 months out of Obama's 8 years make his presidency superior to Trump's, when Trump by many measures has the best economy in at least 20 years, and the lowest black, hispanic, women and under-25 unemployment numbers in fifty years.
