It's been about 6 weeks now. First Barr almost immediately reviewed the Mueller investigation report, and only took about 2 days to review an enormous 450-page report and gave a brief 4-page summary of its findings in a public statement (which I linked, to the exact document, above).

Then Democrats were upset because they wanted the whole report (which is not legally required, the report was written only to be seen by the Attorney General, Mr. Barr.)

Then attorney general Barr about 4 weeks later, after careful review, released almost the entire report, with only about 10% redacted, to protect sources and methods (not wanting to reveal those methods to the Russians and Chinese).

Then Democrats such as Rep. Jerry Nadler wanted all of it revealed.

The same Jerry Nadler who said of the Starr report investigating Bill Clinton:

 Quote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judicia...om-clinton-days

“[Grand jury material]—that is material by law unless contravened by a vote in the House, must be kept secret. Somebody, staff of the Judiciary Committee, perhaps the chairman and ranking minority members of the Judiciary Committee is going to have to go over this material—at least the four or five hundred pages of the report to determine what is fit for release,” Nadler said in 1998.


Mr. Nadler 2019, meet Mr. Nadler 1998 !


There's nothing in the lying Democrat narrative of attacks over the last 6 weeks that disproves the slightest portion of what was released 6 weeks ago.

Allegations that Barr was somehow misrepresenting what was in the Mueller report have likewise come up dry.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/...was-inaccurate/

 Quote:
Mueller reportedly said he was concerned that news coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the special counsel’s work, Justice Department officials told the Post.

However, the Post also reported:
  • When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.



So another lying narrative of the anti-Trump deep state and the liberal media is again disproven.