There is a laughable irony of this having been made public the same week Michael Cohen (the convicted perjuror, used here as the primary source) enters prison for his sentence.
Here is the original Reuters story:
And pointedly, from the article:
Reuters has no evidence that Falwell’s endorsement of Trump was related to Cohen’s involvement in the photo matter. The source familiar with Cohen’s thinking insisted the endorsement and the help with the photographs were separate issues.
Again the disclaimer: implied, not stated. Put Cohen helping Falwell Jr with compromising photos, and combine them in the same sentence with Falwell endorsing Trump.
Reuters implies otherwise, but saves themselves with this disclaimer buried deep in the article.
