That Vanity Fair piece you linked says absolutely nothing new.
First off, Vanity Fair cites its close association with the New York Times, a partisan frequently discredited paper that is deeply committed to slandering Trump.
Second, the ads accompanying the hit piece make clear Vanity Fair's commitment as well to discrediting Trump.
They cite Trump's "other female accusers" but fail to make clear that many of those stories have likewise been discredited, are the clear result of women who are committed partisan Democrats making accusations just to hurt Trump politically, and other women who only made accusations after they didn't get what they wanted in business deals with Trump, as clear vindictive payback. Again, many discredited and proven false. And as discussed before, many are not even sexual allegations, such as "He just looked at me creepy".
And finally, the 'facts' in the article are deliberately misleading. The part about secretary Acosta getting a sweetheart deal for Jeffrey Epstein is untrue. What Acosta arranged was to assure Epstein did jail time rather than an acqquittal, and that Epstein would be registered for the rest of his life as a sex offender. It was others after Acosta who changed Epstein's sentence so that he could be released 12 hours a day and work.
NOT Acosta.
You completely evaded that Bill Clinton is listed with 26 flights to Epstein's "pedophile island", and that on five of those trips Bill Clinton left behind his secret service escort, so that no one was there to observe Clinton's activities.
There is absolutely nothing like that regarding Trump with Epstein. And it is clear that Trump severed all ties with Epstein 15 years ago, and barred Epstein from Mar A Lago, for precisely the sexual assaault on a minor that you are desperately trying to smear Trump with, despite no evidence.
