FEDERAL JUDGE PUSHES BACK AGAINST TRUMP'S CRIITICISM OF HER HANDLING OF ROGER STONE CASE


Both Judge Beryl A. Howell and the other federal judge she defends are both Obama appointees, and Amy Berman Jackson (on the Roger Stone case) previously gave huge leeway to Eric Holder in the Fast and Furious case during Obama's presidency. As lenient with Eric Holder as she was harssh with Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.

And what is Roger Stone's crime anyway? The Mueller special investigation that Stone's showboat arrest and trial was rooted in anded in a not guilty verdict on any crimes by Trump.

So again: What is Roger Stone's crime?

Apparently it was perjury to hide a crime... that never happened?
All the charges were for process crimes, originating from no actual crime, except for the count that alleges witness tampering and threatenign a witness, who says he was never actually threatened, and just "bluster" and Stone being Stone".

His real crime is being an advisor to the campaign that got Donaldd Trump elected president. And all the people securing his prosecution and sentencing were clearly wearing HILLARY 2016 campaign buttons when that occurred.



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ided-with-trump

Here's a Bloomberg article that gives some insight, but also has some visible distortions. Primarily of which
1) It doesn't make clear what is now known, that William Barr and other senior DOJ officials has already made the decision to change the sentencing recommendation to less than 7-9 years, before Donald Trump ever posted about it on social media.
2) It refers to "two different sets of DOJ officials, the first (the four prosecutors who resigned) who made the most severe sentence recommendation, the second being Barr and other senior DOJ lawyers. That the four prosecutors agreed to recommend a lower sentence, and then behind the backs of senior DOJ instead recommended the maximum sentence, so senior DOJ changed the recommended sentence.

On the plus side, it explained Judge Jackson's logic on this and previous rulings, and as the other retired judge said, she will likely go with less than the maximum sentence to avoid accusations and political controversy.

It also makes clear Randy Credico's statement not to prosecute Stone for witness intimidation.

And also makes clear the (alleged!) crosshairs Stone put on the image of the judge. But it didn't clarify his reason for doing so. It could similarly have been venting steam for mistreatment he felt by Judge Jackson in the court room, or for having been arrested in a gun-heavy CNN-filmed show arrest with more guns the Bin Ladin shooting in a midnight raid. Not clarified, but he clearly had reasons, legitimate or not.

But it at least gives an overview of Judge Amy Berman Jackson's previous Mueller and Trump-related cases, mostly ending in the Democrat favor, one ruling in Trump's favor, and that she is a judge appointed by Obama. And the usual sentence for such a crime that the retired judge cited for similar convictions.

I'm still of the opinion that Roger Stone did nothing wrong, and this is Democrat/Deep State payback to find another way to smear Trump. He is convicted for perjury related to Trump, but Trump was found not guilty, so again, it's perjury related to a crime that never actually happened. If Stone is convicted, I expect Stone to be pardoned by Trump the day after the Nov 2020 election.
Likewise Flynn.
Likewise Manafort.
As it should be. That would render things as if this witch hunt never even happened.