I didn’t see Howie making it that specific. He of course doesn’t go into any of Trump’s many accusers so you could be right. That begs the question why Kurtz stayed away from an equal comparison. I’ve seen enough of his columns to know the answer. He writes to please an audience that views a free and independent press as an enemy to their political party.
Most of Trump's accusers
clearly have an ideological/political motive of "we have to stop Trump from getting elected", many clearly stated in exactly those words. One a liberal media reporter with a history of making sexual allegations against previous men. Others who said nothing for years while in business with Trump, then only when they didn't get the payoff or renewed contract they wanted
only then made allegations, in clearly motivated vindictive payback.
In the case of ex-wife Ivanna Trump, she made allegations and then retracted them, saying in her revised statements that she "felt raped,
emotionally". Well, feeling raped emotionally is not rape. She has even met socially with Trump in the White House. But the media lyingly still lists her as one of Trump's 'victims".
And a number of others were just Miss America contestants where Trump walked through the contest dressing room and did nothing to them, but with no assault or actual charges said "he just looked at me creepy" or words to that effect. Again, not examples of assault or inaappropriate contact. But again, the lying media still includes them as "victims" despite that they are
not examples of assault or any other crime. They are grouped together by the media with the others to create an illusion of a massive number of accusers of Trump, but in truth anyone can see when examining the details that these are not assaults. When you sift through all the 18 or so "victims" of Trump, once you eliminate the ones who are subjective perception and not even close to sexual assault, when you eliminate the ones with clear monetary or political motive and/or petty revenge on Trump, you
maybe get one or two who have something resembling a possible legitimate allegation.
And when you consider the other 16 are petty and illegitimate, the likelihood is that the remaining two with serious examination would fall apart as well.
Likewise in the case of the four women who attacked Brett Kavanaugh. 3 of the 4 easily fell apart, and all 4 have a clear motive of being Democrat-leftists, campaign donors, activists, and currently/formerly DNC operatives. The only one that even approached credibility was Christine Blasey-Ford, but she had huge holes and inconsistencies in her story as well. And I'd like to see all four cross-examined and prosecuted for perjury. They wanted to destroy an innocent man's life, let the punishment fit the crime.
