Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#246894 2004-01-04 4:23 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 67
25+ posts
25+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 67
DC’s new Superman revamp will be based on an event that alters the past and creates three separate timelines, giving the creators on each book complete freedom to write the stories they want without worrying about continuity.

True or false?

Read about it here:

silverbulletcomicbooks.com

Titled: Time can do so much...(near the bottom of the article)

It sounds great to me.


I'm Kilgore Trout and I approve this message.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081


Quote:

Time Can Do So Much

I'm told DC's new Superman revamp will be based on an event that alters the past and creates three separate timelines, giving the creators on each book complete freedom to write the stories they want without worrying about continuity.

My source says the Brian Azzarello and Jim Lee Superman will operate in a world without Lois Lane. She'll be dead, allowing for more violent and dark yarns. In the Chuck Austen and Ivan Reis Action Comics it will pretty much be the status quo. Lois is alive and she's married to Superman/Clark Kent. In Adventures of Superman written by Greg Rucka and illustrated by Matthew Clark, Lois and Clark aren't married and she doesn't know about his secret identity. This book will apparently revive the love triangle concept.

All three Supermen will live in Metropolis simultaneously, but will have no knowledge of the alternate timelines. I hear this split will set up a big crossover at the end of 2004 pitting the three Supermen against each other.

This Has A "Seeing Triple" Factor of Five Out of Ten



Last edited by Chewy Walrus; 2004-01-04 8:02 PM.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
Didn't we have a Crisis to keep crap like this from happening again?

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
Yup. About time for a new one, I'd say.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
Especially with stuff like this looming on the horizon...

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
It's all about choice, gentlemen. The choice to be able to read ONE Superman comic a month rather than having to read all of them due to interconnectedness.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 67
25+ posts
25+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 67
It seems pretty simple to me.

In FACT I think it’s such a GREAT idea that I am having difficulty believing it’s true or that ANYONE currently associated with the Superman franchise came up with it.

It’s this straightforward:

Buy the Superman YOU like.

You can now STOP buying the ones you don't like in order to keep up with what Superman is doing with or for his wife.

Unless you like the wife angle and then you can buy Austen's adolescent soap opera pap over in the ACTION title.

I seriously doubt they will use this as a gauge by which to judge the Superman books. Jim Lee will undoubtably bring a disproportionate amount of fans to the SUPERMAN title just for his art.

But shy of launching an “Ultimate” type of Superman book I think this is a fresh and refreshing idea.


I'm Kilgore Trout and I approve this message.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
I was gonna buy the Azzarello/Lee run based on the creative team anyway. I could care less about what "time line" its set in, though now I have to disregard everything I already own - including The Wedding Album and Superman/Bugs Bunny - just to be able to read the new stuff.

Also, how are other titles featuring Supes and his "family" - i.e. JLA, Superman/Batman, and Teen Titans (Superboy) - gonna handle all this?

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
25+ posts
25+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
Quote:

Also, how are other titles featuring Supes and his "family" - i.e. JLA, Superman/Batman, and Teen Titans (Superboy) - gonna handle all this?




I would think they would keep the more "current" Superman. You never know though.


BUTTPLUG!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
1000+ posts
1000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
Quote:

It seems pretty simple to me.

In FACT I think it’s such a GREAT idea that I am having difficulty believing it’s true or that ANYONE currently associated with the Superman franchise came up with it...But shy of launching an “Ultimate” type of Superman book I think this is a fresh and refreshing idea.




I think Birthright was supposed to be that "Ultimate" book...until DC started treating it like the proverbial redheaded stepchild, that is.


My first novel, Wounds of the Heart (http://www.booksurge.com/product.php3?bookID=IMPR02655-00001), has been published. Check it out, if you like.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 47,826
Likes: 8
Hip To Be Square
15000+ posts
Hip To Be Square
15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 47,826
Likes: 8
Wasnt this the reason the Elseworlds imprint was created to stop stupid shit like this happening?

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,524
1500+ posts
1500+ posts
Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,524
Honestly... They can't tell good stories with ONE Supes, so they think adding two more is going to help?

I blame UltiMAXvel for THAT concept... But I blame DC more for such a craptacular interpretation!

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
Creative freedom without the straitjacketed tight inter-title continuity of the last decade and a half will mean better stories in the long run. They're actually getting some good writers on the Superman books now -- something nigh-impossible under the old conditions. It's a good sign. I hope it succeeds.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,708
1500+ posts
1500+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,708
Quote:

Creative freedom without the straitjacketed tight inter-title continuity of the last decade and a half will mean better stories in the long run. They're actually getting some good writers on the Superman books now -- something nigh-impossible under the old conditions. It's a good sign. I hope it succeeds.




Yeah... if they'd just let Waid, Morrison, Millar, and Peyer have their way with the Super-titles in 1998, they probably wouldn't be in this shape right now.


First National Bastard -Enormous, Sexually Voracious Lecher... who wants to claim your immortal soul!!!. Every time you masturbate, God Kills a kitten! Please... think of the Kittens. RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920
devil-lovin' Bat-Man
15000+ posts
devil-lovin' Bat-Man
15000+ posts
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920
There's one reason why this idea could be interpreted as shitty, and that's the fact that it fucks up "the" continuity.
But, seriously, who gives a damn about one big tight continuity anymore? Besides MOTA, I mean.


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
Quote:

But, seriously, who gives a damn about one big tight continuity anymore? Besides MOTA, I mean.




Do you think MOTA is Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons?

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
Quote:

I hear this split will set up a big crossover at the end of 2004 pitting the three Supermen against each other.




This is the part that worries me the most...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,305
kung-fu treachery
5000+ posts
kung-fu treachery
5000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,305
Why?

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
I've never liked the concept of a hero battling himself. A doppleganger or someone with similar powers? Sure. But not a hero battling himself. In my opinion, it's a contrived Pre-Crisis solution, leading to questions like "Could Azzarrello's Superman beat up Rucka's?" or "What would happen if we killed all but the one that we were using before and just call this thing an experiment?" I just don't really care for these kinds of things. Call me crazy, but I rarely like crossovers. They have to be pretty friggin' astronomical for me to buy 'em - like JLA/Avengers (which I'm not really all that keen on, truth be told) or Marvel vs. DC (which I pretty much hated the ending to and the voting system used).

Basically, it's a matter of personal preference, but I just dislike it very much.

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
[insert non-dated reference here]
10000+ posts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
Quote:

In my opinion, it's a contrived Pre-Crisis solution




If it was really a "pre-Crisis solution", the Supermen wouldn't fight -- they'd team up and find whoever was responsible for tampering with the timelines. Since the "Marvel-ization" of DC Comics post-Crisis, though, typical Marvel-type "hero vs. hero" battles -- very rare in DC books pre-Crisis, and almost nonexistent before the '70s -- became more common in DC books. So it's more of a "Marvel solution" than anything. In my opinion, natch.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,305
kung-fu treachery
5000+ posts
kung-fu treachery
5000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,305
Good points. I am not sure yet how I feel about all this. I guess I'll just wait and see.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
I wish theyd bring back the Super horse.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
not that i have a thing for horses....

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
500+ posts
500+ posts
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
Let me be the first to say

FUCKING GAY

Seriously. It's a beautiful idea, and I am ready to embrace the fact that there is three different Supermen. But no way in hell will I ever agree to read a crossover betweent them. I had planned on reading all three when the creative changes happened, but if this whole crossover thing is true I'm done. Through with Superman.

One step forward, three steps back...

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
PAULA ABDUL RAWKS!

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
500+ posts
500+ posts
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
Let me be the first to say

GAY FUCKING

pix plz thnx

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,000
5000+ posts
5000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,000
I still only plan on collecting AOS. So, this just means that Rucka will have more freedom to tell a better story, which will kick the other two books collective asses.


<sub>Will Eisner's last work - The Plot: The Secret Story of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion
RDCW Profile

"Well, as it happens, I wrote the damned SOP," Illescue half snarled, "and as of now, you can bar those jackals from any part of this facility until Hell's a hockey rink! Is that perfectly clear?!" - Dr. Franz Illescue - Honor Harrington: At All Costs

"I don't know what I'm do, or how I do, I just do." - Alexander Ovechkin</sub>
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
1000+ posts
1000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
Quote:

Quote:

But, seriously, who gives a damn about one big tight continuity anymore? Besides MOTA, I mean.




Do you think MOTA is Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons?




Does CBG really deserve that level of insult?


My first novel, Wounds of the Heart (http://www.booksurge.com/product.php3?bookID=IMPR02655-00001), has been published. Check it out, if you like.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
...
10000+ posts
...
10000+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,081
Quote:

I still only plan on collecting AOS. So, this just means that Rucka will have more freedom to tell a better story, which will kick the other two books collective asses.




Myself, I'm only interested in Superman. Azzarrello and Lee are basically a dream team of sorts...

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
1 post
1 post
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
And then there's me. I'm only interested in back issues, reprints, archives and TPBs ranging with stories from '38-'99 at the moment. Why? Berganza has a super power, we just didn't know it. That power? By the very mention of his name, hope, hope for a better comic, is destroyed.


I don't care that no one has ever stopped you before. The moment you set down on my world... the moment you took one innocent life... you left me no choice but to stop you!- Superman.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,708
1500+ posts
1500+ posts
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,708
...and I'm only interested in Kurt Schaffenberger drawn comics, which means Lois Lane from the 60s!

Nobody could draw Lois like Schaffenberger!


First National Bastard -Enormous, Sexually Voracious Lecher... who wants to claim your immortal soul!!!. Every time you masturbate, God Kills a kitten! Please... think of the Kittens. RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 272
200+ posts
200+ posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 272
If DC has a hope in hell, they need to attract new readership, you know, kids. Kids who will continue to read comics as they grow up. Does anyone at DC think that impenetrably craptastic, convoluted storylines will attract new readers?

The Marvel approach works-for Marvel! DC needs to be different and write better stories to survive as more than a branch of the WB toy line!


"Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat."
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
1000+ posts
1000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
Quote:

Captain Cranky said:
If DC has a hope in hell, they need to attract new readership, you know, kids. Kids who will continue to read comics as they grow up. Does anyone at DC think that impenetrably craptastic, convoluted storylines will attract new readers?




I don't know, but I do know that those who zealously cling to the notion of a rigid, inflexible continuity don't give two figs about bringing in new readers. They're convinced that they alone are the lifeblood of the industry, and they're dead-set against any fresh perspectives coming in. And I'm not just talking about MOTA here. There's a guy at the DC site called Shatterstorm who's been savagely vocal in his demands that DC dig their heels in and maintain the status quo and that "new readers be damned, I want the books to be written for me!" (Direct quotes from late 2002; his opinion hasn't changed over time.) He's opposed to DC shaking things up because he's afraid that bringing in new readers and fresh blood would mean that he wouldn't enjoy the books anymore. For a time, he was every bit the troll that MOTA is.

If any new blood is to come in (which it needs to), the continuity zealots are going to have to get out of the way. Otherwise the medium WILL die out. And sooner or later, DC is going to have to realize this, or else WB might just decide to shut them down and use the characters purely for licensing (as was alleged might happen to Marvel during the last few months of Jemas' reign). Something's got to give here.


My first novel, Wounds of the Heart (http://www.booksurge.com/product.php3?bookID=IMPR02655-00001), has been published. Check it out, if you like.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,919
Likes: 28
Doog the MIGHTY
10000+ posts
Doog the MIGHTY
10000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,919
Likes: 28
"Nothing stops an organization faster than people who believe that the way you worked yesterday is the best way to work tomorrow.”

~ Jon Madonna
President of DigitalThink and former manager of several multi-billion dollar enterprises

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,971
URG Offline
URG am real man!
7500+ posts
URG am real man!
7500+ posts
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,971
Quote:

Kilgore Trout said:
DC’s new Superman revamp will be based on an event that alters the past and creates three separate timelines, giving the creators on each book complete freedom to write the stories they want without worrying about continuity.


KOOL URG am read em all!


Cave Babes
http://www.robkamphausen.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/824582#Post824582
Cave Drawings
http://www.robkamphausen.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/860036

Some days urg makes me proud to be his friend. Then there are the days that he steals my beer and fucks my woman. Somedays he gets that backwards.-Lothar

"Those were good days. Sitting around the campfires, eating dinosaur meat, and clubbing our wimmens in the head. I dream of those days sometimes. When Urg would make speeches and lead us to victory over the neighboring tribes. Good days, man. Good days." -Grimm
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,958
some RKMB'ers are Obsessed with Black People Hmmm?
5000+ posts
some RKMB'ers are Obsessed with Black People Hmmm?
5000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,958
Quote:

Stupid Dogg said:
"Nothing stops an organization faster than people who believe that the way you worked yesterday is the best way to work tomorrow.”

~ Jon Madonna
President of DigitalThink and former manager of several multi-billion dollar enterprises




thanks stupid dogg. I'm actually priting that quote out and am going to use it at work today.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
Quote:

The Time Trust said:
It's all about choice, gentlemen. The choice to be able to read ONE Superman comic a month rather than having to read all of them due to interconnectedness.





Or the choice to not read any of it.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
Quote:

The Time Trust said:
Creative freedom without the straitjacketed tight inter-title continuity of the last decade and a half will mean better stories in the long run. They're actually getting some good writers on the Superman books now -- something nigh-impossible under the old conditions. It's a good sign. I hope it succeeds.




I would agree if I thought there was going to be a long run for this. It's just like Disco Blue Superman. A contrived gimmick to try to jumpstart sales. They don't know what to do with the charactr so "big names" and "gimmicks" it is.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
Quote:

The Time Trust said:
Quote:

In my opinion, it's a contrived Pre-Crisis solution




If it was really a "pre-Crisis solution", the Supermen wouldn't fight -- they'd team up and find whoever was responsible for tampering with the timelines. Since the "Marvel-ization" of DC Comics post-Crisis, though, typical Marvel-type "hero vs. hero" battles -- very rare in DC books pre-Crisis, and almost nonexistent before the '70s -- became more common in DC books. So it's more of a "Marvel solution" than anything. In my opinion, natch.




In the very first meeting between the Golden and Silver Age Supermen, they fought. Supes has also battled Captain Marvel (and various knockoffs) as well as WW, Dr. Fate, Green Lantern, and Batman. All well before the so called "post Crisis Marvelization" you mention.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
500+ posts
500+ posts
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 774
It's a great idea, but the fact is, you're going to have to read them all if you want to read the crossover. That's stupid. If it's going to be three, stick with three. Not for six goddam months.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0