Originally Posted By: PJP
 Originally Posted By: K-nutreturns
a little bit. tom brady=longer drives for the pats offense. which means less time for the pats D to get beat on the same play over and over again...
If it was a close game you would be right and have a valid point. But I must say the dolphins had the Pats D totally fooled almost the whole game. There were times the Defense actually stood flat footed and motionless because they had absolutely no clue what was happening.



im not saying the pats would have won with brady. im just saying with him there would have been more ball control for them keeping the D off the field and away from the same play that was beating them so badly. it doesnt matter if it was close or not...

big_pimp_tim-made it cool to roll in the first damn place!
Mon Jun 11 2007 09:27 PM-harley finally rolled with me
"I'm working with him...he's young but, there is much potential. He can apprentice with me and then he's yours for final training. He will remember the face of his father...

Some day, Knutreturns just may be the greatest of us all...."-THE bastard