Why is it that Ayers' past acts are no longer important simply because he's no longer bombing stuff? Should I be allowed to handle an elementary classroom if I molested kids in the past, just because I'm not doing it anymore? And then there's the fact that I'm not repentant about it. Molesting kids is awesome.
umm, how does that make sense? is he around bomb related items? he hasn't been put in charge of an arsenal. srsly, ur analogy is retarded.
are you saying that anyone, not just ayers, who feels that US govt employees and buildings are legitimate targets, should be locked up forever? as long as he is no longer acting out his beliefs, what does it matter what they are? frankly, i wouldn't care if someone did act out those beliefs but that's neither here nor there.
