Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
well MEM what do you have to say now?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
rex Offline
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Who will I break next?
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 46,308
He would say:

Who wants to see a bunch of naked girls?


November 6th, 2012: Americas new Independence Day.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
New York Times:
  • WASHINGTON — Democrats often complained about President George W. Bush’s frequent use of a rhetorical device as old as rhetoric itself: creating the illusion of refuting an opponent’s argument by mischaracterizing it and then knocking down that mischaracterization.

    Now that there is a new team at the White House, guess who is knocking down straw men left and right?

    “Here’s the trick: Take your opponent’s argument to a ridiculous extreme, and then attack the extremists,” said William Safire, the former presidential speechwriter who writes the “On Language” column for The New York Times Magazine. “That leaves the opponent to sputter defensively, ‘But I never said that.’ ”

    The telltale indicators that a straw man trick is on the way are the introductory words “there are those who say” or “some say.”

    “In strawmanese, you never specify who ‘those who’ are,” Mr. Safire said. “They are the hollow scarecrows you set up to knock down.”

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Bush Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The more Obama feels compelled to trash Bush, the more he draws attention to the fact that he is copying — or in some cases falling short of — his predecessor.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 57
I dare to be stupid
25+ posts
I dare to be stupid
25+ posts
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 57
Did somebody say trash? I am Wreck-gar, the bush trashing hero at your garbage disposal!


I am only good for one thing.

GARBAGE!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
Bush has resorted to issuing constitutionally dubious "signing statements," which declare, by fiat, how he will interpret and execute the law in question, even when that interpretation flagrantly violates the will of Congress. Earlier presidents, including Jackson, raised hackles by offering their own view of the Constitution in order to justify vetoing congressional acts. Bush doesn't bother with that: He signs the legislation (eliminating any risk that Congress will overturn a veto), and then governs how he pleases -- using the signing statements as if they were line-item vetoes.




 Originally Posted By: BASAMS The Plumber
President Obama has irked close allies in Congress by declaring he has the right to ignore legislation on constitutional grounds after having criticized George W. Bush for doing the same.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37




As somewhat satisfying as it is to see the Washington Post and liberal media turn on the Anointed One (and only because they can't ruin his chances in another election), he is and has always been something far worse than George W. Bush. He's Barack Hussein Obama.

A cultural Marxist, marinated since at least his teen years in deeply anti-American ideology, who ironically wants to destroy the country he was elected to lead.


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37


 Originally Posted By: Washington Post article
In a cruel echo of history, Obama is morphing into the president whose foreign policy he campaigned to overturn. Obama on Monday morning sacked his Pentagon secretary, Chuck Hagel, after huge midterm election losses in the sixth year of his presidency — just as Bush did in sacking Donald Rumsfeld after midterm losses in the sixth year of his presidency.

As with Bush, the ouster comes as a war in the Middle East is going badly — then, the Iraq war, now, the bombing of the Islamic State terror group. Rumsfeld’s ouster led to the surge in Iraq, and Hagel’s departure comes amid signs of an expanded role for U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria. And, as under Bush, this guarantees that Obama will leave his successor an ongoing U.S. war in the Mideast — quite possibly the sort of ground war Obama vowed to undo.

The neo-cons who dominated the Bush administration feel some vindication watching Obama struggle to avoid repeating history. Dov Zakheim, a Bush-era Pentagon official, said Hagel was offered up as a “sacrificial lamb” by a White House trying to stall further escalation in Syria and Iraq. But “I just don’t think they have that luxury” of avoiding an expanded U.S. role, he said. “They’ll agonize as long as they possibly can, but the clock is ticking a lot faster than they anticipated.”



What you can clearly distill from this WP piece is that, as far-left as Obama has governed, they would like to see Obama move even further left.
And they seem genuinely annoyed that Obama is actually doing even token action to preserve, protect and defend the United States. They would prefer that he just continue to deny reality and not do anything to resist the aggression and further threats of ISIS, Iran, Russia and China.

I think it's clear that Obama is only doing the minimum he is because to do less would cause him to further lose even the remaining political support among leadership in his own party.


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0