Originally Posted By: thedoctor
... I saw nowhere where G-man said that not having a town hall was an infringement on free speech. ....


Try reading the posts yourself...

 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man

At this point I think the Dems should just give up on the town halls and ram a bill through when they get back.


At least you've finally admitted that this isn't about the voice of the people and is about the Democrats doing whatever hell they want.


Like many others I voted for those that campaigned for this reform. Since the townhalls just seem to be turning into a screaming match what's the point in having them? I think if the Republicans want to continue having them though they certainly should. I may even go to some myself


Typical MEM. He supports free speech for himself and like-minded Democrats but thinks that anyone with a differing viewpoint should be shut down and silenced.


That's not free speech G-man. Your right of free speech doesn't extend to forcing others to be your audience.


If people want to shout and disrupt town halls then let them organize there own.

Fair play!