Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
 Originally Posted By: Pariah
Apparently you did since you just said you didn't necessarily think reform would help.


I said I didn't think a bill would be all wonderful or perfect. Recognizing that a bill isn't going to be flawless is hardly the same thing as "reform for reform sake".



You are advocating for what you admit is a flawed bill. So why rush it through?

Once a law is passed it normally takes another law to change or modify it. As we all know, passage of a law is a complicated and often time consuming process.

Therefore, once a flawed bill is passed the American people are likely stuck with it for the at least the foreseeable future?

Why not keep working at the bill until it is at least closer to "wonderful [and] perfect?"

Otherwise, aren't the Democrats essentially advocating "reform for reform's sake"?


No because taking more time only opens it up to what would probably be more of a flawed bill or no bill at all. That may please you politically g-man and your party but not America.

Fair play!