Why not just post them under your real name? Since you say there is no risk then let's see that principled stand of yours. Otherwise it's really Rob that's taking the risk on your behalf and making the stand, not you.
I love how you constantly speak on Rob's behalf without actually referring to how he feels on the matter just so you can avoid addressing the point on how much of a disingenuous alarmist you are.
This was never about risk for anyone but yourself and your own excuses. Or do you honestly believe your acting in Rob's best interest?
I didn't speak on Rob's behalf. I didn't suggest one way or the other as to how Rob feels about it. G-man however made the argument that there wasn't any risk. He of course hides who he is. The obvious point is that there is risk even not taking into account death threats from religous fanatics.
