The fact that no one is nationally covering this (and please don't say "oh it's a local movement", that's retarded) absolutely PROVES Big Business Media Bias. Why would Murdoch support the protestors that are against him?
I notice that often when some protest or event happens that O'Reilly doesn't report it the first day, and reports it a day, or several days, later. Because he makes an effort not to just repeat erroneous information, and confirm firsthand what the facts are.
I mention O'Reilly because he is probably the single most influential conservative source.
And as I said, in 2008 Wall Street was Obama's largest financial supporter. So if Murdoch exposed Wall Street, he would be damaging or even cutting off Obama's largest financial backer.
