I think it makes a valid point.
That the protestors' message is confused. And that they're blindly anti-corporate and anti-capitalist, even as they enjoy the luxuries that didn't exist even 20 years ago that these corporations provide.
If the protestors had a valid argument, it would be "damn the corruption."
But the message is a more sweeping "damn the capitalists, damn the rich".
Yet, it doesn't really have a "valid" point. It's pointing out that humans....who have no other choices as to what to wear, and no choices what tech they can use...aren't allowed to protest these lack of choices. What's the alternative?
They protest naked. Yeah, that will get far.
They protest, but only in clothes they made themselves. And since most of them aren't electrical/technical engineers, they would have to use art sketches to portray an honest record as to what's happening. That's just as ludicrous, and wouldn't be taken any more seriously by anyone.
They don't protest. Big Business, the Corporate Right, and all the corrupt criminals from both sides of the aisle in DC are happy. Congrats, you just crushed a freedom movement AND assisted Obama and his corporate cronies. How do you feel now?
So, that's why I dismiss it. It's the most basic, dismissive suggestion anyone can make. It's a 5th grader's attempt at trying to discredit the movement. Thus, no surprise Rex posted it, I guess...
