...Iggy has lowered himself by cheering pro on...
I find that Iggy is human, like most of us here. Sometimes I agree with him (and vice versa), sometimes not (and vice versa). Sometimes I think he's reasonable and insightful. Other times I think he's unnecessarily combative.
While I agree he let himself get a little too invested in pro's off-putting foolishness I find that if one responds to iggy calmly and with good humor he tends to be a pretty good guy most of the time. On the other hand, accusing him of (paraphrase) "LIES" and "SLANDER" tends to get "bad Iggy" to stick around.
Thank you. I can deal with that assessment. Take the OWS stuff, for example. So far as I can remember, there weren't a lot of questions asking what I disagreed with the protestors about. Honestly, there is a lot. I'm not a fan of them slowing down the day traders by occupying Wall Street. They are just trying to make a buck in a system that the major banks control from unassuming warehouses filled with computers that are trading all the time. I get and, to a point, support the symbolism but, I don't think they understand the real world consequences of their actions. Nobody bothered to ask. I didn't bother to tell.
As for the Cain stuff, there is a legal system to handle these allegations if they are really so spurious. I'm no fan of the Beiber but I think her legal team is doing a great job in making a point in prosecuting those that engage in spurious paternity claims. That a pop star has assembled a better legal team says a lot about my thoughts of a Cain presidency.
