Dancing around my point WB. You downplay Rove's status with the super pacs but it still existed. I don't think there is a liberal equivalent to Rove being on FOX. He had over a billion in pac money invested in defeating Obama. Did Ailes have a problem with that before Romney lost?
The Huffington Post doesn't seem to agree with you that there's any difference. You're grasping desperately for a way to demonize Republicans while excusing your own side. But there really isn't any.