Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
Much of Zimmerman's story depends soley on his telling of events. It's not disingenous to point that out those most of his story are not facts.


Uh...

 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Even if reasonable people can disagree on what the evidence means there were many people who said many things that backed up Zimmerman's claims.

It was hardly a case of self-defense being based solely on what Zimmerman said.

For you to imply otherwise is beyond a matter of opinion. it is simply disingenuous on your part.


Which corroborating evidence and witnesses I summarized just a few posts above.