MEM, I tried to explain to you the issues in this case. I acknowledged that reasonable people could differ on what the evidence meant.

You could have reviewed what I wrote and addressed it in a like manner.

Instead you misstated the evidence and refused to consider that any reasonable person could interpret the issues differently than you.

You reacted in a like manner to any other poster here who noted the potential problems with the prosecution 's case.

So...suck it.