Lol, I'm guessing she's had good lawyers since back when the GOP was going to get her on Whitewater and all the other very important and nonpolitical investigations they've ran on the tax payer dime over the decades.
What if Hillary Clinton was destroyed by the contradictions in her testimony before Congress yesterday, and the media reported it as a "win" for Hillary, ignoring how she was caught red-handed with the evidence of her own lies?
Hillary, Obama, Susan Rice, Jay Carney and the complicit liberal media created a false narrative in Sept 2012 that Benghazi was about protest to a Youtube video, protests that spun violently out of control. But, polar opposite, Hillary's e-mails show she repeatedly told family and co-workers that in those exact days she knew IT WAS AN AL-QAIDA AFFILLIATED ATTACK. Even as Hillary, Susan Rice, then-whitehouse spokesman Jay Carney, Obama himself and others went out in the days after those incriminating e-mails and sold the false narrative of it being caused by protests to an anti-Muslim Youtube video. Sold a narrative they knew to be false (as incriminatingly specified in Hillary's own e-mails) to the grieving parents and families of those killed in the Benghazi attacks.
And Hillary even repeated that she knew the truth to the president of Egypt.
But the pro-DNC "Hillary 2016" media refuses to report it. Despite all this evidence, the media (with the exception of Fox) are not reporting the facts, declaring victory for Hillary Clinton, and failure for the Republican investigators in Congress.
Did they watch the same testimony as the rest of us?!?
A day after new records were made public showing Hillary Clinton said from the start the 2012 Benghazi attack was not linked to an obscure anti-Islam film, the father of a former Navy SEAL killed that night told Fox News she blamed the filmmaker for his son's death in a conversation with him.
Charles Woods, father of Ty Woods, who died defending the CIA annex, shared with Fox News the diary notes he took after his encounter with Clinton during the ceremony on Sept. 14, 2012, when the bodies were flown back to the U.S.
"I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand. And she said we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son," the entry says.
"She said -- the filmmaker who was responsible for the death of your son," Woods emphasized as he read his diary entry. Woods attended Thursday's hearing where the former secretary of state testified to the Benghazi congressional committee.
"She wasn't saying the failed foreign policy that I was responsible for. It wasn't her taking the blame for it. It says we are going to place the responsibility [for] the death of your son on the filmmaker," he said.
Woods' account of what Clinton told him contradicts what then-Secretary Clinton reported to her own family, as well as senior Libyan and Egyptian government officials.
Citing an email Clinton sent to her daughter Chelsea the night of the attack, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said at Thursday's hearing that she told them, "Two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an Al Qaeda-like group.''
Further, Jordan said she told the Egyptian prime minister the next day that they knew the attack was "planned" and had "nothing to do with the film."
One day after then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said on five Sunday talk shows that the attack grew out of a protest over the film, Fox News was first to report on Sept. 17, 2012, based on an intelligence source on the ground in Libya, that there was no protest outside the Benghazi consulate.
Yet, at the hearing, Clinton blamed the "fog of war" for confusion about what happened, and conflicting accounts, though her own statements to her family and foreign government leaders suggest otherwise.
And she pushed back on the notion that she directly blamed the video, stressing that she said in a statement that night that some had sought to use the video to justify the attack.
"I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks," she said.
She said they were dealing with "fluid" and "fast-moving" and "conflicting" information that night. She also said there were probably many motivations, suggesting the video may still have motivated some attackers.
Woods said Clinton either lied to her family and senior leaders of foreign governments, or to the victims' families and the American people. He said her lack of candor disqualifies Clinton from being promoted to the nation's top job.
"In order to follow a leader, as a commander-in-chief, the military needs to trust what their leader says. They're putting lives on the line. They have to know that what she says is true in order for them to be able to sacrifice their lives," Woods said.
_____________________________
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent. [quote]
Megyn Kelly, in the opening minutes of her program tonight (Friday, Oct 23 2015) did a splendid job presenting the facts revealed in Congressional committee hearings yesterday with Hillary Clinton testifying, vs. the false narrative the media is now reporting, where those facts are ignored, and they declare Hillary the exonerated winner, and Republican investigators as losers who revealed nothing new.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
The State Department released the latest batch of Hillary Clinton e-mails, 22 of which were not released because the information in them was so classified that it was dangerous to national security to release them, the most incriminating batch of her released e-mails so far.
The New York Times (just coincidentally, the same day they endorse Hillary Clinton as the Democrat nominee) does an excellent job of blunting and softpedalling the significance of these security-violating e-mails by Hillary, and the negligent danger of them to U.S. national security, and to the lives of agents in the intelligence field.
You may well have blocked me, Wondy, but I agree with you that Hillary should be in a world of indictment shit right now. Even if this started as a GOP plan to try and damage Hillary, it has turned in to a fair hearing on--at the very least--her competence. A GOP candidate would have been called to drop out of the race a hundred times over by this point. The fact that there hasn't been such clarion calls for Hillary just exposes the fact that the "establishment" is behind both parties and really are afraid of what the "Trump-Sanders Energy" represents, IMO.
That's the best Street Fighter cut screen yet. FIGHT!
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
You may well have blocked me, Wondy, but I agree with you that Hillary should be in a world of indictment shit right now. Even if this started as a GOP plan to try and damage Hillary, it has turned in to a fair hearing on--at the very least--her competence. A GOP candidate would have been called to drop out of the race a hundred times over by this point. The fact that there hasn't been such clarion calls for Hillary just exposes the fact that the "establishment" is behind both parties and really are afraid of what the "Trump-Sanders Energy" represents, IMO.
?!? That was back in... what... 2011 ?
I agree with you on virtually all points. I wouldn't say that investigating Hillary "started as a GOP plan to try and damage Hillary", it was an investigation of the truth, and damaging Hillary was just a happy byproduct of it. Although to listen to Democrat pundits, no one cares about either scandal anyway.
I'm actually more independent and less of a Republican loyalist these days, and largely see them as a party ALMOST as hijacked as the Democrats by the establishment, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Wall Street banks, and other campaign financing globalist corporate interests. ALMOST. But I still feel there is an outnumbered Tea Party/conservative minority in the GOP who are the best hope for restoring our Constitutional freedoms.
With multiple FBI investigations of Hillary Clinton, regarding her e-mails risking national security and violating laws for her State Secretary position, regarding pay-to-play donations to the Clinton Foundation.
It's my dream that Hillary will be the first presidential candidate to flee the country to avoid prosecution!
I think the best clip ever of Hillary is her recent barking episode.
This clip touches on just a few of Hillary's Himalayan stacks of past comments that would get that lie-detecting dog barking.
In a panel with Kirsten Powers and Nomiki Konst tonight on Megyn Kelly, Hillary's barking was compared to Howard Dean's crazy yell, that ended his candidacy.
I find it amazing that even after the evidence keeps piling up, none of Hillary Clinton's rivals, and no one in the liberal media finds it worth discussing with her. As I posted earlier, Megyn Kelly did a good job of presenting the case against Hillary back on Oct 23rd...
...and despite how much higher the stack of incriminating evidence is now, no one challenges her either in the debates or on TV news.
Only the voters have challenged her, in multiple state primaries, as her numbers continue to decline.
Any embracement at all of Hillary, with all this blatant corruption on her part, is testament to how corrupt and morally bankrupt the Democrats are. As is the "Hillary 2016!" media, that abdicates their responsibility as journalists, and looks the other way.
The Justice Department is granting immunity to the former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server, The Washington Post reported Wednesday night.
The move is a sign that the FBI investigation into possible criminal wrongdoing is progressing, the Post reported.
A senior U.S. law enforcement official told the Post that the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano, who worked on Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.
The next step is a likely interview of Clinton herself as the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months. Her senior aides also will be sought for interviews.
The key question is whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said. Another key question will be whether the setup of the server was a scheme to hide information.
The inquiry comes against a sensitive political backdrop in which Clinton is the favorite to secure the Democratic nomination for the presidency.
"As we have said since last summer, Secretary Clinton has been cooperating with the Department of Justice’s security inquiry, including offering in August to meet with them to assist their efforts if needed," Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon told the Post, adding that the campaign is "pleased" Pagliano is now cooperating.
Pagliano previously invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
The Justice Department, FBI and Pagliano's lawyer declined to comment.
The probe will look what damage would have been done had the confidential information been exposed, the Post reports, adding that while the Clinton campaign has described the investigation as a security review, the Justice Department and FBI have said they are looking into whether a crime was committed.
"There was wrongdoing," the newspaper quoted a former senior law enforcement official. "But was it criminal wrongdoing?"
Attorney General Loretta Lynch told Congress earlier this year that the case is being handled by "career independent law enforcement agents, FBI agents, as well as the career independent attorneys in the Department of Justice" who will follow the evidence, look at the law and "make a recommendation to me when the time is appropriate."
The FBI is likely trying to establish whether Clinton and her aides understood the protocols of sending and receiving classified information, former officials told The Post.
Clinton has said she did not send or receive information "marked classified" at the time, though hundreds of the emails released through a Freedom of Information Act request are now deemed various degrees of classified and include redactions – in some cases the entire email.
Fox News' Catherine Herridge reported on Monday that one of the emails in the final batch released was withheld on request of law enforcement, and that she had received a tip months ago that at least one of them contained information that the senders understood the information was classified at the time.
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Wednesday called the grant of immunity "an ominous development" for the Clinton campaign.
"This suggests the investigation is moving to a whole other level, and granting immunity means they'll question this individual and get all the facts of what he did and in particular, what secretary Clinton told him, what her close associates told him, what they knew and instructed, and that suggests that the legal jeopardy is just getting greater and greater," Cruz said on Fox News Channel's "The Kelly File."
Seems like hot air and wagon-circling really. I have no doubt that Obama and his ilk hate Clinton, but I'm not convinced that Obama's man in the DoJ (Loretta) is going to jeopardize DEMs' chances for the WH just to soothe his ego.
Veteran journalist Ronald Kessler tells Newsmax TV that Hillary Clinton will likely be indicted before the general election for using a private email server to conduct classified government business as secretary of state — but will likely be pardoned by President Barack Obama.
"Definitely before November. Possibly in a month or two," Kessler said Friday on "The Steve Malzberg Show."
Existing law is very broad, making it a felony to handle classified information with gross negligence, Kessler said. "By definition, putting classified information on an unsecured server is gross negligence.
"You saw President Obama trying to make excuses for her. I think he's leading up to giving a pardon to Hillary, but there's no question. She will be indicted," Kessler said.
"Jim Comey, the FBI director, is a man of great integrity. I think [Attorney General] Loretta Lynch is as well … not political in the way Eric Holder was. No question she will be indicted."
Kessler — a former Washington Post reporter and author of "The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents," published by Crown Forum — said that even if Clinton is pardoned, the damage will have been done.
Either way, she's going to be besmirched and it's possible that [Vice President Joe] Biden might step in," he told Malzberg.
Kessler also praised Donald Trump as a candidate who would be very different operating in the White House than how he appears on the campaign trail.
"People don't understand about Donald that there are two Donald Trumps. One is the guy you see on TV who makes these provocative comments to get attention," Kessler said.
"But as we get more into the general election, he's going to start behaving like the Donald Trump I know … and that is a very competent, reasonable guy who built this great empire. $10 billion in assets, 22,500 employees — he didn't do that by being a bigot or by being an idiot."
Kessler finds the nicest way of describing Trump's dishonesty and crudeness. I think the problem is that there is obviously only one Donald Trump and like Clinton, will be held accountable for the things he says and does.
Even assuming what you say about Trump is true, you are clearly blind to Hillary Clinton's decades-long trail of lies, dishonesty, and personal loathsomeness.
AGAIN: Just the most recent dishonesty by Hillary, roughly 100 FBI agents are currently investigating (1) her jeapordizing top secret national security with her illegal e-mail server, (2) illegal donations from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation that amount to buying a potential president, and (3) Hillary Clinton's negligence as Secretary of State and lies and cover-up to protect herself regarding the Benghazi embassy attack, that is also perjury, if not treason.
I'm sure everyone knows by now that Comey is on something of a warpath after it was discovered that Bill Clinton maneuvered himself into a meeting with Lynch before their flights. Needless to say, it looks terrible.
Based on what we know from the emails, there's obviously enough to indict her. But it's unlikely the FBI would have done it--PRIOR to this happening with Clinton and Lynch.
Obviously, none of the below can be confirmed 'til after the fact, so take it with a grain of salt. But don't discount it. At all.
The images won't be up for long, so I recommend you save and read on your desktops.
I recommend you use a VPN before viewing this thread on the subject--if you would like to:
FBI Director Comey just had a 15-minute press conference where, incredibly, he did NOT recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton.
So... the fix is in.
That announcement ignores the facts that:
1) While Comey says that there's not enough evidence that Hillary Clinton "intentionally" violated federal laws with her illegal private e-mail server (outside of the statedepartment.gov secured website), prosecution is still warranted even with unintentional revealing of classified information (i.e., "gross negligence")
2) Comey ignores that criminal charges have been brought against other State Dept and high level officials, such as David Petraeus, for far lesser negligence regarding e-mails and classified information.
3) Comey ignores that Hillary Clinton in one e-mail to her staffers to just take away the "classified" headers on an e-mail, before passing on a classified e-mail to others. That right there manifests willful intent, beyond any doubt.
4) Hillary Clinton's private server not only left her own classified e-mails vulnerable to hacking by the Russians, Chinese, Iranians and "Goosifer", but also created a path to hack the e-mail accounts of other State Dept, Pentagon and other high-level officials through their e-mail communication with Hillary Clinton, where their accounts were hacked as well. Goosifer said as much.
And Comey took no questions, that would have allowed these OBVIOUS contradictions from being thrown in his face.
The Democrats will use this announcement as an opportunity to say "nothing to see here, move along", but it clearly bypasses the facts.
Add to that how Hillary made an announcement minutes after Comey's press conference, and it appears Hitlery knew the outcome long before it was announced.
The Clintons are slippery, but this email thing seems to be sticking to her like tar. DEMs have been scared to talk about it at all--and never mind the fucking WH press secretary who has no idea how to handle it.
The presidential election is not for almost 2 years. By then the mainstream media will circle the wagons around their queen elect and decree this to be "old news nothing to see here MoveOn," while giving whoever the Republican candidate is an anal probe over something he did at the age of five to a kid on the playground.
Told ya over a year ago. The fix was in from day one.
Yeah... that doesn't make it any easier to swallow, though.
There's no way this should be allowed to stand.
What are we supposed to do? The press is in the tank for her so her misdeeds get covered up. She isn't getting prosecuted. We live in a banana republic these days. Best we can hope for is she has another stroke before the election and this one can't be covered up because it paralyzes half her face or something obvious. Even then, the center left media will probably tells us we have to hire the handicapped.
Peter Johnson, Fox News' legal advisor, made clear that Comey said that while the FBI has evidence of criminal negligence on Hillary's part, that he did not think there was adequate evidence to bring about a conviction.
Tony Sayegh compared it to John Roberts' decision with Obamacare in early 2013. That while the evidence was there to render the right decision, Comey (like Roberts) rendered a purely political decision that would take the heat off himself.
Regarding what we can do, we can write our public officials and voice our outrage. And the Trump campaign and conservative media can mention it every day until the election and not let it go. I think especially on the internet and social media, a war can successfully fight against the Democrats' and liberal media's holy war on the truth.
Does it occur to anyone that Comey's decision is announced just a few days after Bill Clinton met illegally with attorney general Loretta Lynch? The corruption stinks to high heaven.
If the alleged FBI leak on /pol/ is to be believed, the CF itself is more important than the emails by a million fold. And he's hoping that either Halfchan or president Trump will bring her down for him.
If he's correct, then it's not totally outlandish for me to believe that the FBI are too scared of World War 3, and Civil War, to prosecute the bitch.
Personally, I'm okay with both since, you know, never compromise in the face of Armageddon. In which case, the FBI has questionable priorities.
Well aware of that. However, supposing Trump wins and he has access to the FBI's resources--and he's not as scared shitless as the FBI--what's to stop him from blowing the lid on the full brevity of her corruption?
The digging hasn't stopped over at Infinity. They've amassed a mountain of connections in the new investigatory thread regarding the Clinton Foundation.
(1) Bill Clinton met Loretta Lynch, and (2) just a few days later James Comey says his FBI doesn't recommend prosecution, and (3) Barack Obama JUST TWO HOURS LATER campaigned for the first time with Frau Hitlery, and (4) the very next day Loretta Lynch said the Justice Dept will not prosecute Hillary Clinton on the criminal charges Comey said she is clearly guilty of.
That was the first shoe dropping.
Now we have WikiLeaks releasing internal e-mails from inside the DNC, showing they were openly plotting various schemes to side with Hillary and crush Sanders' campaign, despite the stated position that the DNC would be "neutral" and not play favorites.
Just announced this morning, Debbie Wasserman Bitch-Cunt Schultz, the Chair of the DNC, will as a result be excluded as a speaker from the convention that SHE ORGANIZED. A direct result of the WikiLeaks story on her partisanship in rigging Frau Hitlery as the candidate over Sanders. Fox News has already given extensive coverage of it. MSNBC has not a word to say about it so far, but astonishingly, still is ranting endlessly about Ted Cruz not endorsing Donald Trump and the disarray in the GOP, while simultaneously ignoring the disarray in the DNC, even as they go into a convention! CNN finally did mention the WikiLeaks story, but was diminishing the significance of it, and likewise didn't even mention Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's exclusion from the convention.
Your "HILLARY 2016!" liberal media at work!
Why Hillary Clinton didn't sink like a stone in the polls after the Lynch/Comey thing in my first paragraph is a complete mystery to me.
But after this second shoe dropping, she should sink even further, especially among Bernie Sanders supporters. And they just might storm the Bastille during this DNC convention.
