Why is the article a lie from the outset WB? Seems like every couple of days more of it gets confirmed by the WH. Your previous post for example cites a Trump lawyer saying Trump had nothing to do with JR's meeting. That clearly wasn't true. Now we know Trump was involved.
Because it isn't "confirmed". All it says is that President Trump talked to Trump Jr regarding the meeting. Which again, was set up by Veselnetskaya under false pretenses, and in which no actual information was exchanged. You guys cling to the slightest whiff of a POTENTIAL Trump scandal, while ignoring the ACTUAL Hillary Clinton corruption, collusion and bribes: ....
So unless Trump confirms something it's a lie? I think you know that is a very flawed standard that you only are employing politically. As for the Clinton stuff, your side is in power so again you are very political in your outrage. Tell you what though, if the Russia stuff reaches the level of your Benghazi witch hunt the GOP had (investigation after investigation) I'll actually agree with you on the veracity of this special counsel on Russia. All happening not because of the Dems btw.
