Just yesterday Trump's Secretary of State grudgingly admitted there wasn't a deep state. My guess is the evidence if we get to see it will show Spanky colluding and obstructing among other things. Imagine if this was a democrat. Do you really think anything your saying now would be in that case.
Come on, M E M.
You HAVE to know by now that there is FAR more evidence of Hillary Clinton/Obama/DNC collusion with the Russians. And despite the off-the-cuff remark of one official (that I'm not sure you even quoted in context) plenty of evidence of a Deep State in an Orwellian and decidedly undemocratic way.
And that much of the alleged "collusion" by Trump officials was orchestrated to appear that way by Obama/Deep State officials. Veselnetskaya and her meetings BEFORE and AFTER she met with Trump Jr. I mentioned above. Jeff Sessions, who was photographed shaking hands with the Russian ambassador at a public event, another meeting that was orchestrated by Democrats. (i.e., Democrats at multiple stages have set up the situation where Trump officials can falsely be accused of "collusion", when Democrats KNOW the allegations to be false, because they manufactured those situations (not Trump officials) in the first place!
Maybe you saw my comment above, where Michael Caputo reported the many offers made to him of potentially top secret Hillary Clinton e-mails, that he reported to House, Senate and Meuller investigators, who were remarkably uninterested. Because he didn't take the bait for their trap!
With the possible exception of the Kennedy assassination, there has never been more evidence of a massive and ambitious conspiracy. A conspiracy so wide that even many Establishment/Deep State Republicans don't want to investigate it.