Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
In the Flynn case the FBI knew he was lying about his russia contacts because they listened in on the calls if I recall correctly. Why would he lie WB?



With an illegal FISA warrant applied for with falsified evidence by James Comey and Andrew McCabe. Who should both be in jain for falsifying evidence given to a judge.

Flynn was tricked in what appeared to be a casual meeting with FBI officials (one of them Peter Strzok) with no warning that his statements could be used to manufacture perjury charges. He was even discouraged to bring an attorny to advise him. In contrast in a similar meeting Hillary Clinton had NINE attorneys to advise her.

Even the FBI ageents who interviewed Flynn said they did not think he was lying. And then despite his cooperation, turned it around and threatened him with a long perjury sentence, to shake him down into accepting a plea bargain.
The same trick they did to Pappadapoulos.
The same trick they did to Manafort.
The same trick they attempted on Jerome Corsi (who said they offered him no jail time, if he would testify to the false script they gave him to read.)

The officials running the investigation are the ones committing the crimes, not the ones they are shaking plea bargain confessions out of. They should be convicted and in jail.

Mueller, Weissmann and Comey have a history of shaking down people and convicting innocent people. Just ask the executives at Arthur Anderson and the 10,000 people they employed, who lost their jobs because of them. Ask the higher court who overturned the conviction, but not before two of the executives died in prison. And after the conviction was overturned years later, it wasn't possible to recreate the company and the 10,000 jobs lost.