All the options out there and you have the guy that was fucking his side chick while still married though saying he was engaged to his new piece of tail at a ::checks notes:: Christian conference.
All the options out there and you have the guy that was fucking his side chick while still married though saying he was engaged to his new piece of tail at a ::checks notes:: Christian conference.
That means dick to me.
Didn’t he commit election fraud too?
I guess that's why people like Wondy trust him as an expert!
Diinesh D'Souza made an overly large donation to a college friend of his who was running for political office. If it were any Democrat who did the same thing, they would likely not be prosecuted. The normal sentence would be a fine, as has been given to others who have done the same. But because it was Dinesh D'Souza, a documentary film-maker and author who has given a lot of embarrassing exposure to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the broader Democrat party, he was maliciously prosecuted and forced to do jail time where others guilty of the exact same offense simply had to pay a fine.
D'Souza's conviction is yet another example of the one-sided Democrat weaponization of the FBI and DOJ.
Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.
EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.
It’s okay if you accuse the other side of doing it too in other words. Your principles smell.
You're a liar.
The sentence given to D'Souza for a minor offense was not equal punishment under the law, as I just detailed in my post above. It was instead malicious prosecution, and extravagant and disproportionate sentencing to a political opponent. Where a Democrat guilty of the same offense would not be prosecuted, and a normal person not a prominent Republican would simply be given a fine, instead of 8 months in jail and exhorbitant fines, a sentence that is not given to others for the same excessive election donations.
Your hero is actually the liar. To you it’s all about what you want to hear. When your hero commits voter fraud it’s “unfair” that he was caught. Your principles smell and you just rut in it.
Last edited by Matter-eater Man; 2021-08-3110:18 PM.
Your hero is actually the liar. To you it’s all about what you want to hear. When your hero commits voter fraud it’s “unfair” that he was caught. Your principles smell and you just rut in it.
It's not about "what [I] want to hear", it's about the facts. As opposed to the clear Newspeak propaganda you've been so eager to believe for 5 years, even when they are caught over and over being deliberately wrong. Watch that Sharyl Attkisson video again. She cites an hour of examples, and that's far from a complete list of deliberate liberal media lies and propaganda over the last 5 years.
The best economy, particularly benefitting the middle class and poor, minorities, women, and people under 25. Trump re-negotiated trade agreements with pretty much all our trading partner nations. Re-building our military. Defeating ISIS in Iraq/Syria, Getting NATO nations to pay their fair share of Europe's defense, for the first time since the alliance was formed. Making the U.S. energy-independent for the first time in 70 years. Securing the southern border, on and on.
Biden's only accomplishment is wrecking all that, based on pure spite, and incompetent Bolshevik/Left ideology.
I think also Trump enjoyed support from democrats when spending benefited the national interests. He had 4 years where he and his party spent unprecedented amounts of money in a time of economic growth. Democrats also didn’t hold the debt ceiling hostage like republicans have and are threatening to do so again.
I think also Trump enjoyed support from democrats when spending benefited the national interests. He had 4 years where he and his party spent unprecedented amounts of money in a time of economic growth. Democrats also didn’t hold the debt ceiling hostage like republicans have and are threatening to do so again.
Yahoo News... wow, glad you didn't go to a hard-left liberal propaganda source....
Re: "unprecedented spending"... You have to be joking. Obama DOUBLED the national debt in 8 years, from $10 trillion to 20 trillion when he left office. Biden has spent more in his first 6 moths than Trump spent in his entire presidency. And again, Trump wanted lower budgets, but the Democrats extorted pork spending to allow Trump's budgets to pass. For example, Trump pushed for a budget of 700 billion to re-build the military that Obama had destroyed. But Schumer, Pelosi and the Democrats extorted a total of $1.6 trillion before they would pass it, extorting an additional 900 billion beyond what Trump wanted, and because of the urgency and danger to the country of having a military where 50% of its planes were not combat ready, Trump allowed it.
So as usual, you're a propagandist, knowingly fronting your party's deceitful talking point lies, instead of the truth that it was Democrats pushing for that deficit spending, not Trump. You know that, but you perpetuate the lie anyway.
Sorry but when you consider anything outside of OAN & conservapedia as hard left your the one being the propagandist. I watched you and other “conservatives” for 4 years being okay with Trump’s deficit spending and it’s really the same thing every time when it’s a republicans in charge of the WH. You never hold them accountable and you guys give yourself whiplash trying to hurt the economy when it’s a democrat. I’m frankly done with supporting deficit reduction at this point because of your party’s games.
Sorry but when you consider anything outside of OAN & conservapedia as hard left your the one being the propagandist. I watched you and other “conservatives” for 4 years being okay with Trump’s deficit spending and it’s really the same thing every time when it’s a republicans in charge of the WH. You never hold them accountable and you guys give yourself whiplash trying to hurt the economy when it’s a democrat. I’m frankly done with supporting deficit reduction at this point because of your party’s games.
That's another lie of yours. While I do on many occsasions quote OAN and Conservapedia, I far more often link and cite Fox News, Newsmax, Washington Times, Daily Caller, American Thinker, Washington Journal, Townhall, and many other sorces, and even on occasion CNN and other Left-leaning sources, to show that EVEN THEY are reporting that what I say is beyond denial.
As I said with specific example, over and over, Trump would request certain levels of funding, and Democrats would push for far more in deficit spending to allow the budgeting to be passed. How stupid are you? I specifically gaave the example of the military defense spending, Trump wanted $700 billion, it was the Democrats who added an additional 900 billion in social spending earmarks and spending for Planned Parenthood and sso forth. It's an absolute lie to call that "Trump's reckless spending", that was clearly DEMOCRAT spending, not Trump's.
And again, Obama's 10 trillion in new spending in 8 years far exceeds the spending in Trump's 4 years, that the Democrats caused and blamed him for. And again: Biden has far surpassed the spending in all 4 years during Trump's term, in just Biden's first 6 months! You are SUCH a liar, how can you even try to front the lying narrative you're selling. It's an idiot rationalization to blame and scapegoat Trump and Republicans, for what your Democrat-Bolshevik radical party is clearly responsible for.
I can agree that over the last 40 years, both parties have contributed to escalating the national debt. While primary blame clearly rests on the Democrats, the establishment Republicans like McConnell and Linsey Graham and John McCain Paul Ryan and John Boehner and Mitt Romney are part of the problem, an elite that is unaccountable to the American people, and participate in legislation that advances unnecessary spending that enriches the corporations who lobby them, while enriching themselves. And who are then rewarded with cushy jobs for those same corporations, for both them and their families, as in the examples of the Bidens, the Clintons, John Kerry and his stepson, and so many others, on both sides of the aisle. Again the best book on that I've read is Obamanomics by former Washington Times editor Timothy Carney, that I think is pretty nonpartisan and equal in its condemnation of many in both parties enriching themselves with unnecessary government spending.
But for you to blame Trump.... Trump in his 4 years was the disrupter who was attempting to break up that corrupt lobby system. If at some points he was willing to negotiate to get things done and submit to that existing system to some level to do so, that is not nearly the same thing as your scapegoat Democrat-talking-points argument that he was the one responsible for it. Clearly at every point, Democrats are the gas on government spending, and Republicans (especially Trump) are the brakes. Democrat never use words like fiscal responsibility and smaller government. Fact.
History proves you wrong but I accept that you will keep being the partisan you are. For me after seeing the same game played over and over again I just will no longer support deficit reduction. Republicans don’t do it when they have control of all 3 branches so you are a fool to expect democrats to be more conservative than your shitty anti democracy party.
History proves you wrong but I accept that you will keep being the partisan you are. For me after seeing the same game played over and over again I just will no longer support deficit reduction. Republicans don’t do it when they have control of all 3 branches so you are a fool to expect democrats to be more conservative than your shitty anti democracy party.
"History" does NOT prove me wrong.
The facts I cited prove YOU wrong, despite your best efforts at a lying scapegoat Bolshevik narrative.
I'm sorry that you are immune to the information and facts I cited, repeatedly. It is Democrats who are the prime movers of deficit spending, although I can concede that a large ratio of Republicans likewise enrich themselves in the lobbyist and campaign-finance system. The two-party system is largely a one-party system, controlled by campaign finance by corporations, to buy the policy and leaders they want. Again, that case is well made in the book Obamanomics by Timothy Carney.
When Republicans did control both houses in 1996 and 1997, they forced Bill Clinton against his will to sign a balanced budget agreement, and a "workfare" reform of the welfare system. Gingrich orchestrated actual reduction in spending. That ended with the 9-11-2001 attacks, and unavoidable increased spending for homeland security and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. George W. Bush's presidency from 2001-2009 was a break from Reagan conservativism, who was a big-government Republican (i.e., a RINO) who I did not vote for in 2000, and only voted for in 2004 because the Democrat alternative was even worse. Bush did some things right, and a lot wrong that I vocally disagreed with on these boards during his term.
Pat Buchanan made a case against this in his 2004 book Where the Right Went Wrong and accurately predicted it would hurt the Republican brand, as happened in the 2006 and 2008 elections where the Democrats gained majorities in both houses, and Obama gained the presidency, before quickly showing the Democrat-Bolsheviks were not a better alternative an lost the House by a huge margin in 2010. Only because of Democrat-Bolshevik weaponization of the IRS against tea Party and religious conservative groups, and to intimidate and crush large Republican donors like Frank Vandersloot, did Obama narrowly win a second term in 2012.
I've cited the examples where Trump wanted less spending, and Democrats forced hundreds of billions in additional spending, more than double the spending, added on before they would fund rebuilding our military. That is not "Trump spending" that is clearly Democrat spending, despite how you insanely and irrationally try to spin it, ignoring the actual facts.
::uncritical finger-banging on keyboard because I let all the media outlets I want to be true decide what I think on any given day::
translated:
Originally Posted by Iggy
I'm a coward troll, just trying to start some shit. I have absolutely nothing of value to contribute. And I can't dispute WB's facts, so I just ignore the facts, and keep making personal attacks, based on nothing.
Yeah, I knew that.
Slanted Journalism and the 2020 Election - Sharyl Attkisson at Hillsdale College, citing how the mainstream media has abandoned journalism, to willingly become Orwellian Newspeak for the Democrats
Journalists like Sharyl Attkisson, John Stossel, Ron Kessler, Bernard Goldberg, John Solomon, Glenn Greenwald, Lara Logan and other ACTUAL journalists with decades of Pulitzers and other awards for their journalistic excellence in investigative reporting, were forced to leave the corrupted networks they previously worked for, in order to actually report objectively, and not have their work blunted and twisted into slanted propaganda. It's not what I "believe", or "want to be true", it's what is objectively true, and reporters who are willing to investigate and report it. Who have given up high-paying positions to continue to objectively report.
I would further add that many of these reporters are self-identified left-of-center liberals, such as Attkisson, Goldberg and Greenwald, who may be liberals or even Biden voters, but still have journalistic integrity and a loyalty to the facts. That CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post and other sources Attkisson cited and quoted, do not.
