There have been ice ages and hot ages as long as there's been a planet Earth, and there is zero evidence to date that any change in the weather (or "global warming", or "climate change") are a result of human activity or pollution.
I've seen interviews of multiple dissenting meteorologists with decades of their careers studying the weather, present the actual facts, that there is no evidence human behavior is changing the environment, or that weather is in fact getting worse. That there is, in fact, still a lower level of storm activity than in other decades of the last 100 years.
But I would agree that with a larger global population, when severe weather storms occur, their damage now impacts more people.
The Earth in the last 100 years has only risen one tenth of one degree in temperature ( 0.1 degrees) in the last 100 years.
I'm open to the idea that in the future it
could be proven to be the result of human activity at some point, just that at this time it has not been proven.
And I have increasing distrust of the ideologically dug-in scientific community we rely on for our environmental "facts".
Over the last 20 years or so, when they say there is "a 96% consensus among scientists" of the authenticity of global warming theory, that is because the liberal/progressive/activist Left controls the scientific community and the universtiies where scientific research is done. And any scientist or academic who expresses dissent
or just scientific objectivity and skepticism will find themselves ostracized, unemployed, and at the very least not promoted.
So very few are willing to risk that dissent.
Further, the example about 15 years ago, where scientists in both North America and Europe were together cooking the books to make new global warming research conform to their pre-existing theories of global warming. I'm amazed anyone still believes anything they say after that.
There's also the Cultural Marxist use of environmentalist "global warming" paranoia as a weapon to control people. As exemplified in the UN's written
Agenda 21 plan, to move people out of rural areas where they can have their own farmland and create their own food, and have their own values and pass them on to their children. Agenda 21, in the holy name of global warming, gives them the authoritarian power to move them off of rural land and concentrate them in cities, where they can be more easily surveiled, controlled and indoctrinated. And their ability to pass on their beliefs to their children are blocked by ubiquitous messaging of the state. And unable to grow their own food, the state can take away their jobs, their self-sufficiency and even their food supply, and starve them into submission.
An example from history:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HolodomorAnd the authoritarian socialism/Marxism of Stalinist Russia is not so different from that of the lunatic Marxists in the Obama and Biden administrations and those in Europe envision for the nation.
Obama's fortunately rejected "Cap and Trade" system involved "carbon credits" and monitoring the thermostat of every home, and monitoring units installed in every car, that would measure the location and distance travelled, and to where, of every person in the U.S..
And once rejected, Marxist Democrats are just finding new ways to re-package and push these controls on us in another form.
Which is why I increasingly see "Climate Change" as just another made-up con to impose Democrat/Marxist authoritarian controls on us, in the name of pseudo-science.