quote:
Originally posted by ManofTheAtom:
What about Spider-Man? Since he didn't experience a Crisis his continuity is longer than Superman's, with more stories that are still considered to be in continuity.

JMS manages to use this continuity perfectly, yet Waid can't do the same with Superman...
Won't do the same with Superman. Y'know, this "Waid sucks cause he can't work with continuity!" argument is infantile. You know he CAN, take his work in Flash as an example.
As for Spider-Man, see my last post.

quote:
Originally posted by ManofTheAtom:
Superman is accesible, the books just suck because they are outdated, they fit better in the 70's than today.
And you'd rather make them fit in the 80's.
So Superman is accesible? And you've heard this from how many new readers? Tell you what, let's tell one of the mods here to make a poll asking how accesible Superman's continuity is.

quote:
Originally posted by ManofTheAtom:
So far it has lasted perfectly for 17 years, until now, until Waid came along and fucked it up, till Berganza fucked up the books. MoS has NOTHING, not ONE thing to do with ANTYHING that's happened in the comics in over five years.
Then it has lasted perfectly for 12 years, not 17. And that's about how much it should last logically. Around a decade.
It had nothing to do with the comics the last five years, but it was still there. They couldn't tell an origin because MoS couldn't be denied.
I'm gonna ask you this directly and I hope you answer it this time: say there's never another Crisis like event again. Do you think Man of Steel should last forever?

quote:
Originally posted by ManofTheAtom:
Death of Clark Kent wasn't that bad. I found Kenny Braverman to be a very interesting character.
The storyline and the villian promised a lot, but it ended up being one boring arc with a lame ending.