Here in So. Cal with the grocery Union strike, Wal Mart has been literally on the front page of local news as the rationale of the Grocery companies for wanting concessions and a lower pay scale for their associates is (according to the companies) on account of having to compete with the coming Wal Mart superstores.
I wish I had a few articles published that showed the literal misery that accompanies Wal Mart's low prices in places like Honduras and China. It's not just the loss of manufacturing jobs in America that is the result of Wal Mart's quest for lower and lower prices, but it also accounts for the lowering of an already dismal pay scale in the third world as Wal Mart threatens to take their buisness elsewhere if places like Honduras cannot accomadate their demands for more goods at cheaper and cheaper prices. What that entails is even less pay, more layoffs and more work for people that already toil for peanuts at 10 to 12 hours per day.
I dunno... in my opinion, it's the new slavery. To have people in other countries earning 10 bucks or so a month to bring people cheap toys and shirts. And as far as i'm concerned, the price of that cheap shirt is waaaay too expensive when you consider that for a few bucks more out of your pocket, perhaps an AMERICAN could be employed making your garments or furniture rather than them um...working at Wal-Mart stocking chineese goods at $6.50 an hour.
I havent had time to actually read each and every post as I'm just back from a few days offline (some SOB with a trojan pretty much sabatoged my comp & am just getting it back from Fry's Electronics). I did notice someone mentioned the toy wars. On that note, I did find an article on toy making chineese labor.
quote:
December 19, 2003
COMMENTARY
Some Dissembling Required
Truth is, Christmas joy brought by Santa's toys probably comes courtesy of Chinese sweatshop labor.
By Beth Joyner Waldron, Beth Joyner Waldron is a public policy analyst and writer in Chapel Hill, N.C.
Santa's ear was bent pretty hard listening to my 4-year-old son's extensive Christmas wish list.
Like many parents this time of year, I wouldn't dare bring disappointment to those puppy-dog eyes so filled with the sugarplum fantasy of Santa's darling elves happily crafting toys for good little girls and boys.
So on Christmas Eve, I will surely find myself slipping those long-dreamed-of toys under the tree.
But my holiday cheer will be tempered by the knowledge that Santa's toys will not have been lovingly made at a North Pole workshop but rather quite probably in an overseas sweatshop.
Toymaking is big business, accounting for an astounding one-tenth of the world's total trade volume, according to the International Council for Toy Industries.
Americans must surely love toys because we spend an average of $405 per child annually, according to the Toy Industry Assn. There are almost 1.7 billion children under age 14 worldwide, with only 4% of those living in the U.S. And yet 37% of all toy retail sales take place in the U.S.
Look closely on any mass-produced toy and you are likely to find a "Made in China" logo. That's because, as the China Toy Assn. likes to boast in its trade publications, 75% of the world's toys are manufactured in China. China is now the largest single supplier of toys to U.S. children. In 2002, the U.S. imported $17 billion in toys — and just over $12 billion of that came from China.
China dominates the toy industry because of its comparatively low production costs. American toy workers on a production line average $11 an hour, while their Chinese counterparts earn a meager 30 cents an hour.
It is not surprising, then, that in the ever-present quest for low-cost production, toymaking has migrated overseas. Unfortunately, poor working conditions are often associated with low-wage labor.
Overseas factories have long attracted the attention of international human rights organizations, which in past years have publicized widespread sweatshop working conditions and the use of child and forced labor within China.
One such organization, the U.S.-based National Labor Committee, released a report last year that detailed abuses within China's toy industry. The group investigated eight large toy companies that operated 19 factories and employed more than 50,000 workers in the Guangdong province of China.
Among the disturbing findings that turned up in the investigation:
• Mandatory daily work shifts of 15 to 16 1/2 hours, with 20-hour shifts during the peak holiday production season. In one stuffed-toy factory, people were found working shifts of 27 straight hours. Many workers were required to work seven-day workweeks, some allowed to take only two days off a month.
• Workers in the surveyed factories made 12 cents to 14 cents an hour, with a mere $8.42 being earned for a 72 1/4-hour workweek.
• Workers were found handling toxic chemical glues, paints and solvents without adequate safety protection in factories where the temperatures rose to over 100 degrees.
The International Council for Toy Industries, an umbrella trade group representing the toy associations of 19 countries, is trying to address the sweatshop problem. It provides certification to manufacturing facilities in member countries that comply with a standardized code of business conduct. The idea behind the program is that trade group members conduct business only with certified factories.
The concept is noble, but the council's program is still in its infancy and loopholes abound, making it easy for manufacturers to sidestep the inspection process.
Until major corporate retailers and importers take a more active role in ensuring that the toys they contract for are made without sweatshop labor, substantive reform of the toy industry is wishful thinking.
So what's a well-intentioned parent like me to do when shopping for toys during this festive time of year? Not much.
Like so many parents, I want to make my son happy on Christmas morning. And yet I know that his privileged joy may be coming at the cruel expense of toy workers halfway around the globe.
In this scenario, the magic of what carols tout as "the most wonderful time of the year" is easily lost.
True, the article isn't related to Wal Mart in particular but it is representative of what is now called "The Wal-Mart-ization of America"
