RKMBs Forums .::Important::. Politics and Current Events "It's not about oil or Iraq..."

Quote:

---

U.S. TO HUSSEIN: WMD A-OK
New documents detail how Rumsfeld and Reagan let Iraq know it was just
fine to keep using chemical weapons against Iran, Kurds

December 30, 2003 -- Sometimes democracy works. Though the wheels of
accountability often grind slowly, they also can grind fine, if
lubricated by the hard work of free-thinking citizens. The latest example: the
release of official documents, obtained under the Freedom of Information
Act, that detail how the U.S. government under presidents Ronald Reagan
and George H.W. Bush nurtured and supported Saddam Hussein despite his
repeated use of chemical weapons.

The work of the National Security Archive, a dogged organization
fighting for government transparency, has cast light on the trove of
documents that depict in damning detail how the United States, working with
U.S. corporations including Bechtel, cynically and secretly allied itself
with Hussein's dictatorship. The evidence undermines the unctuous moral
superiority with which the current American president, media and public
now judge Hussein, a monster the U.S. actively helped create.

The documents make it clear that were the trial of Hussein to be held
by an impartial world court, it would prove an embarrassing two-edged
sword for the White House, calling into question the motives of U.S.
foreign policy. If there were a complete investigation into those who aided
and abetted Hussein's crimes against humanity, Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld and former Secretary of State George Shultz would probably
end up as material witnesses.

It was Rumsfeld and Shultz who told Hussein and his emissaries that
U.S. statements generally condemning the use of chemical weapons would not
interfere with relations between secular Iraq and the Reagan
administration, which took Iraq off the terrorist-nations list and embraced
Hussein as a bulwark against fundamentalist Iran. Ironically, the U.S
supported Iraq when it possessed and used weapons of mass destruction and
invaded it when it didn't.

It was 20 years ago when Shultz dropped in on a State Department
meeting between his top aide and a high-ranking Hussein emissary. Back then
the Iraqis, who were fighting a war with Iran, were our new best friends
in the Mideast. Shultz wanted to make it crystal clear that U.S.
criticism of the use of chemical weapons was just pablum for public
consumption, meant as a restatement of a "long-standing policy, and not as a
pro-Iranian/anti-Iraqi gesture," as State's Lawrence S. Eagleburger told
Hussein's emissary. "Our desire and our actions to prevent an Iranian
victory and to continue the progress of our bilateral relations remain
undiminished," Eagleburger continued, according to the then highly
classified transcript of the meeting.

The Shultz/Eagleburger meeting took place between two crucial visits by
Rumsfeld, acting as a Reagan emissary, to Hussein to offer
unconditional support for the Iraqi leader in his war with Iran. In the first
meeting, in December 1983, Rumsfeld told Hussein that the United States
would assist in building an oil pipeline from Iraq to Aqaba, Jordan. He
made no mention of chemical weapons, even though U.S. intelligence only
months earlier had confirmed that Iraq was using such illegal weapons
almost daily against Iranians and Kurds.

That administration's eye was not on the carnage from chemical weapons
but rather the profit to be obtained from the flow of oil. In a later
meeting with an Iraqi representative, as recorded in the minutes,
"Eagleburger explained that because of the participation of Bechtel in the
Aqaba pipeline, the Secretary of State [Shultz] is keeping completely
isolated from the issue. Iraq should understand that this does not imply a
lack of high-level [U.S. government] interest." (Shultz had been chief
executive of Bechtel before joining the Reagan administration and is
currently a director of the company, which is signing contracts for work
in Iraq as fast as U.S. taxes can be allocated.)

Minutes of that meeting and others in which the United States ignored
Hussein's use of banned weapons while extending support to the dictator
mock the moral high ground assumed by George W. Bush in defense of his
invasion. If, as Bush II says, Hussein acted as a "Hitler" while
"gassing his own people," during the 1980s, we were fully aware and
implicitly approving, via economic and military aid, of his most nefarious
deeds.

Hussein's crimes were committed on our watch, when he was a U.S. ally,
and we knowingly looked the other way. But don't take my word for it;
check out http://www.nsarchive.org .

---