What you're selling, "unrestrained id"/Whomod, is still a partisan cocksucker's argument, that has a sole focus on anything negative said about the Bush administration's Iraq policy.
With no attempt at balance, no reflecting of positive things said by experts, or balanced acknowledgement of positive changes resulting in Libya (surrendering its nuclear program), Lebanon(free elections, and moving out of Syria's influence), Egypt (scheduling its first election), and Saudi Arabia (also possibly moving toward elections), Afghanistan (another new democracy), and elsewhere.

No one is saying Iraq or Afghanistan, or even the United States itself is free of problems. Even the United States had more than its share of problems, well before George W. Bush took office, before 9-11-2001, and before the March 2003 Iraq war.



But as was reflected on panel discusions I watched this morning on both FOX News Sunday and NBC's Meet the Press, it is a few officials who can be found to give quotes of the kind you click-and-dragged, and many others who see greater prospects for a democratic Iraq.



It's nice to see that the posted views of G-Man and myself are getting exposure in the Washington Post and other major papers, though.

  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.