Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#229187 2003-12-14 8:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
I'm curious to see what people think about this.

Should it be an American military court?

Should it be an international criminal court?

Should it be an Iraqi court?

#229188 2003-12-14 8:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,377
2000+ posts
2000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,377
I think Iraq should, but I think the outcome will be the same.

#229189 2003-12-14 8:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 342
300+ posts
300+ posts
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 342
I think it should be some international crime court. We can't do it ourselves...it would make us look bad.

I think Iraq would be too biased - either "for Saddam", or too harsh on him - to give him a fair trail (not that he deserves one)...

#229190 2003-12-14 8:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
The conscience of the rkmbs!
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,833
Likes: 7
I'm not sure. Iraq has every right to be the one that judges him, but....... [eh... i dunno... ]

#229191 2003-12-14 9:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Here is another question: should Iran be involved in his trial? He was responsible for the Iran-Iraq war in the 80s, which caused the deaths of millions.

#229192 2003-12-14 9:44 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32,001
Likes: 1
PJP Offline
We already are
15000+ posts
We already are
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32,001
Likes: 1
The Iraqis should and probably will try him.......Iran should not be involved that evidence of the Iran-Iraq war will be a part of the trial without their involvement.


.....However I want the Americans to gaurd him until the trial is over.

#229193 2003-12-14 9:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
I think there is little doubt of that. It wouldn't surprise me if he is whisked off to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean for a while. I doubt we'll hear much about him while he is interrogated for a few months.

I'm really hoping that he gets handed over to the Hague, like Milosevic. I don't trust an Iraqi Sharia court. I would like Iraqi jurists to be on the panel. I don't think American, Australian, Polish or British judges or prosecutors should be involved. There should be no perception of a victor's justice, or a kangaroo court.

#229194 2003-12-14 10:11 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
10000+ posts
10000+ posts
Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,896
I think it should be an international court. How to go about deligating who actually tries him personally, however, is beyond me. Far too many hidden hands.

#229195 2003-12-14 10:18 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32,001
Likes: 1
PJP Offline
We already are
15000+ posts
We already are
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32,001
Likes: 1
quote:
Originally posted by Dave:
I think there is little doubt of that. It wouldn't surprise me if he is whisked off to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean for a while. I doubt we'll hear much about him while he is interrogated for a few months.

I'm really hoping that he gets handed over to the Hague, like Milosevic. I don't trust an Iraqi Sharia court. I would like Iraqi jurists to be on the panel. I don't think American, Australian, Polish or British judges or prosecutors should be involved. There should be no perception of a victor's justice, or a kangaroo court.

I wouldn't mind if he goes to the Hague......cause more than likely wherever he is tried.....the outcome will be the same.

#229196 2003-12-14 10:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
There is no death penalty in the Inernational Criminal Court at the Hague.

#229197 2003-12-14 10:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
I dont exactly trust international tribunals, remember it was the international community who thought it was unjust to remove from power a genocidal maniac, so their record of judegement is a little screwy.

#229198 2003-12-14 10:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
quote:
Originally posted by britneyspearsatemyshorts:
I dont exactly trust international tribunals, remember it was the international community who thought it was unjust to remove from power a genocidal maniac, so their record of judegement is a little screwy.

You forgotten Aussies, Brits and Poles were out there in the desert too?

In any event, courts don't follow the will of the people like governments.

#229199 2003-12-14 11:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
I didnt forget, we (Aussies,Brits,Poles ect.) are in the minority of the international community, the majority believed his killings were ok as long as it wasnt in their backyard....

#229200 2003-12-14 11:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
quote:
Originally posted by britneyspearsatemyshorts:
I didnt forget, we (Aussies,Brits,Poles ect.) are in the minority of the international community, the majority believed his killings were ok as long as it wasnt in their backyard....

No, the majority didn't believe that anyone had shown that Saddam had WMDs, and that in the absence of such evidence this was not a good reason to go to war.

No one said anything about Saddam's genocidal history as being the main reason for an invasion until WMDs weren't popping up.

Anyway, the idea is for judges to judge Saddam, not judge Bush on whether or not there should have been a war. Different issues.

Carla de la Ponte is the chief prosecutor in the Hague. She must be rubbing her little Spanish hands in gleeful anticipation.

#229201 2003-12-14 11:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
i think there were alot of people metioning his genocidal history as a reason to remove him, the WMD were used as for the timing of removing him.....

#229202 2003-12-14 11:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 23,091
The Once, and Future Cunt
15000+ posts
The Once, and Future Cunt
15000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 23,091
This fellow seems to be a good choice for judge.

 -

Bub.

#229203 2003-12-14 11:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Jaburg53:
This fellow seems to be a good choice for judge.

 -

Bub.

actually he's not, i mean soldiers came into the mansion and he gutted as many as he could, then when theyre are surround by police and Pyro saves their ass he gets all pissy, i think he's a hypocrite!

#229204 2003-12-14 11:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13

#229205 2003-12-15 12:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 23,091
The Once, and Future Cunt
15000+ posts
The Once, and Future Cunt
15000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 23,091
Darn your fancy lawyer talk, Dave.

#229206 2003-12-15 1:16 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
Rob Offline
cobra kai
15000+ posts
cobra kai
15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Jaburg53:
This fellow seems to be a good choice for judge.

 -

he actually sorta resembles the guy they just captured!

quote:
Originally posted by Dave:
There is no death penalty in the Inernational Criminal Court at the Hague.

the UN reiterated their stance today, saying that if the trial fell before them, they would (could) not support an execution.

personally, unless the gulag from kingdom come is complete, i think the best decision should be letting the new iraqi government decid, when they finally take over (i'm assuming the trial wouldn't start until next year anyway).

i mean, i'd like the trial to be held in the states, but... perception would horrible, with all the obvious bias -- perhaps even enough to have a decision later turned over.

its not worth the chance of extra time and effort (and expense) for personal satisfaction. let it be done as fairly has possible.

i do know that whatever decision is made, dubya will be accused of more cartoonish super villainy.

#229207 2003-12-15 2:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
And he would have got away with it if not for those meddling French!

I discussed this with a mate of mine in the gym today. He doesn't think the Hague will get to try Saddam, because the US has spent so much time ensuring that its soliders are not able to be tried there. Sending Saddam there will give it legitmacy.

One big benefit for a trial in Iraq is that it will give a fair justice system a chance. The Iraqi people will learn how a real justice system is supposed to work.

#229208 2003-12-15 4:17 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,469
Likes: 37
I think the ones who deserve to try Saddam are the Iraqi people. From what I understand, though, their court system is not solid enough yet to credibly handle such a case without a question of prejudice.
There's also the stigma that the present Iraqi government is seen throughout the Arab world as a puppet government to the whims of the United States. Perhaps if the trial is held more than six months from now, after the people of Iraq have voted to elect their first government.

I think an international court of some kind would be best, but not the Hague, for reasons stated by others above.

But ultimately, I'd like to see TWO trials of Saddam: one international, and one inside Iraq.

Even if the Iraqi trial is just largely symbolic. I think it would be a cathartic end for the Iraqi people to Saddam's 30-year era in Iraq's government.

quote:
Originally posted Rob Kamphausen:


...i do know that whatever decision is made, dubya will be accused of more cartoonish super villainy.

Ain't it the truth.

#229209 2003-12-15 4:22 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Yes, I agree: kind of like the Truth Commission in South Africa.

#229210 2003-12-15 4:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,170
I have gas.
2000+ posts
I have gas.
2000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,170
al Qaida should.

Then when Osama bin Laden comes out of the mountains as judge we nail da bastard!!!

#229211 2003-12-15 11:22 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,205
fudge
4000+ posts
fudge
4000+ posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,205
quote:
Originally posted by jafabian:
al Qaida should.

Then when Osama bin Laden comes out of the mountains as judge we nail da bastard!!!

hmmm, that might work [wink]

#229212 2003-12-15 1:18 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,030
6000+ posts
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,030
I would think an international court, such as the kind held at Nuremberg in 1945/46 should be assembled to try Hussein.

Now, for an interesting twist...why not try to flip Saddam for bin Laden? You know, cut Saddam's sentence to life in prison if he gives credible info leading to bin Laden's capture?

Jim

#229213 2003-12-15 3:11 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
Rob Offline
cobra kai
15000+ posts
cobra kai
15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
judge judy could get'em both in 15 minutes with commercials.

she's the boss, apple sauce.

#229214 2003-12-15 6:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,289
2000+ posts
2000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,289
I agree with dave the Wonder Boy. The Iraqi people should have their shot at a trial, but they aren't ready for something like that yet.

If not the Hague, then who internationally? The coalition are not an internationally recognised group witht eh right to carry such a trial out.

If it's an international trial, he wouldn't be executed, but where would he be kept? I can't see him slopping out his bucket in block c every morning. Is the bastard just going to spend the rest of his life in a hotel room?

#229215 2003-12-16 9:39 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
I'd be more confident in the Hague's ability to try him if not for the fact it's taken them approximately years to try Milosevic with still no end in sight.

#229216 2003-12-16 9:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you)
50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734
Likes: 2
I say shoot him in the head. Quick,easy,cheap!

#229217 2003-12-17 2:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
quote:
Originally posted by the G-man:
I'd be more confident in the Hague's ability to try him if not for the fact it's taken them approximately years to try Milosevic with still no end in sight.

That's because they're trying to give him a fair trial.

The Economist reports British Government concerns with an Iraqi tribunal. Political pressure by the UK on the Iraqi interim ruling council has brought about a war tribunal with a right of appeal and a right to legal representation, which wasn't guaranteed before. They are really worried about the trials becoming the equivalent of Soviet show trials of the 30s and 50s: no rule of law, lots of bluster, and summary executions.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,398
Likes: 38
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
"Hey this is PCG342's bro..."
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 34,398
Likes: 38


"Are you eating it...or is it eating you?"

[center][Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com] [/center]

[center][Linked Image from i13.photobucket.com][/center]
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Saddam Hussein's first trial for crimes against humanity got under way in Iraq today, though it quickly adjourned until next month:

    [Presiding judge Rizgar Mohammed] Amin, a Kurd, tried to get Saddam to formally identify himself but Saddam refused and finally sat. . . .

    The other defendants include Saddam's former intelligence chief Barazan Ibrahim, former vice president Taha Yassin Ramadan and other lower-level Baathist civil servants. . . .

    Ramadan also refused to identify himself to the judge.

    "I repeat what President Saddam Hussein has said," he added.


At which point, I imagine, Saddam shouted, "You idiot! Now they know my name!"


Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Meanwhile, it appears that some Europeans still think Saddam should've been tried by an international court:

    A United Nations judge has criticized the trial of former dictator Saddam Hussein by an Iraqi special court, saying Monday it would have been better to task an international court with the case.

    Wolfgang Schomburg, a German who sits on U.N. tribunals trying war crimes in former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, said the Iraqi court, advised as it was by U.S. lawyers, had some features of "victors' justice."

    In an interview with Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Schomburg said the world could have set up a special court for Saddam.

    "Since the United States does not cooperate with the permanent court of international criminal justice in The Hague, a tribunal supported by the international community as a whole would have had to be set up, as happened with Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone."


Reuters, meanwhile, brings us a report on the Yugoslavia tribunal:

    The trial of Slobodan Milosevic may take another 4 to 5 years if the former Yugoslav president accused of genocide gets his way, the prosecutor of the U.N. war crimes tribunal said on Tuesday.

    Milosevic wants to call almost 200 witnesses for his defence case, prosecutor Geoffrey Nice said. They include former U.S. President Bill Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair. . . .

    The trial, that began in February 2002, has been repeatedly delayed due to his heart condition and high blood pressure.

    Prosecutors have tried to speed up proceedings by asking the court to consider working four or five days a week instead of three. The request was rejected due to Milosevic's health. . . .

    The court is supposed to complete all cases, including appeals, by the end of 2010.


If the Iraqis had gone with a Hague-style tribunal, Saddam Hussein would probably die of old age before he could be executed for his crimes.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 14,203
1 Millionth Customer
10000+ posts
1 Millionth Customer
10000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 14,203
I really think that this could make a great new sitcom.
I'm thinking NBC, maybe get Kramer to play the lawyer.


Bow ties are coool.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,203
betrayal and collapse
5000+ posts
betrayal and collapse
5000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,203
Is this the first instance of a formerly enslaved (couldn't think of a better word) country trying its own dictators?

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 14,203
1 Millionth Customer
10000+ posts
1 Millionth Customer
10000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 14,203
Quote:

theory9 said:
Is this the first instance of a formerly enslaved (couldn't think of a better word) country trying its own dictators?



Nixon resigned and Ford pardoned him before he could be tried.


Bow ties are coool.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
Rob Offline
cobra kai
15000+ posts
cobra kai
15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 45,826
Saddam Co-Defendant's Lawyer Kidnapped
By OMAR SINAN, Associated Press Writer


    BAGHDAD, Iraq - Ten masked gunmen kidnapped the lawyer for one of Saddam Hussein's co-defendants Thursday, police said. Saadoun Sughaiyer al-Janabi, who was in the courtroom for Wednesday's opening session of the trial, is one of two lawyers for Awad Hamed al-Bandar, one of seven Baath Party officials being tried with Saddam.


giant picture
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Saddam's victims ready to testify

    At least 10 victims of Saddam Hussein's brutal regime are to face the former dictator today and testify to his role in the 1982 killings of more than 140 people, officials close to the tribunal said.

    Iraqi national security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie's office said yesterday that police had foiled a Sunni plot to bomb the courthouse. The statement said the 1920 Revolution Brigades had planned to rocket the building, the Associated Press reported.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051205/ap_o...HNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

Quote:

Saddam: 'I Am Not Afraid of Execution'
By HAMZA HENDAWI, Associated Press Writer


BAGHDAD, Iraq -
Saddam Hussein told the judge at his trial Monday that "I am not afraid of execution" during a chaotic court session in which the first witness took the stand and testified that the former president's agents carried out random arrests, torture and killings. The outburst was one of several by Saddam or his co-defendants at the trial that also saw a brief walkout by his defense lawyers.

At one point, Saddam appeared to threaten the judge, saying: "When the revolution of the heroic Iraq arrives, you will be held accountable."

Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin replied: "This is an insult to the court. We are searching for the truth."

Earlier, however, Saddam told the court he understood the pressures upon the judges and defended his actions. He and his seven co-defendants could be executed if convicted on the charges stemming from the deaths of more than 140 Shiites in 1982.

Before the trial adjourned until Tuesday, Saddam repeatedly interrupted testimony and appeared to try to rally Iraqis against the U.S. occupation.

"This game must not continue, if you want Saddam Hussein's neck, you can have it!" Saddam said. "I have exercised my constitutional prerogatives after I had been the target of an armed attack.

"I am not afraid of execution," said Saddam, who then addressed the judge, saying, "I realize there is pressure on you and I regret that I have to confront one of my sons. But I'm not doing it for myself. I'm doing it for Iraq. I'm not defending myself. But I am defending you."

When the first witness Ahmed Hassan Mohammed spoke, Saddam told him: "Do not interrupt me, son."

"If it's ever established that Saddam Hussein laid a hand on any Iraqi, then everything that witness said is correct," he said.

He also told the court that he "would like (the witness) to be examined by an independent medical institution."

Amin had a difficult time keeping order during several clashes between the witnesses and the accused, with Saddam and his co-defendant and half brother, Barazan Ibrahim, gesturing and shouting together. In one instance, Saddam pointed to the sky with his right hand while he held Islam's holy book, the Quran, in his left.

"Everyone must remain calm and be civil," he said repeatedly.

At one point, Saddam and Ibrahim became so angry while Saddam sparred verbally with the judge and a second witness, Jawad Abdul-Azziz Jawad, that guards tried to calm them. Ibrahim smacked them on the hands with a notebook.

Saddam himself became so angry that he threw some papers he was holding, and they eventually landed on the floor.

Earlier, former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, who is helping represent Saddam, sought to address the court, touching off an argument that led to the walkout by the defense team.

Amin at first said only Saddam's chief lawyer, Khalil al-Dulaimi, could speak. Amin said the defense should submit its motion in writing and warned that if the defense walked out then the court would appoint replacement lawyers.

After the defense lawyers left, Saddam, shaking his right hand, told the judge: "You are imposing lawyers on us. They are imposed lawyers. The court is imposed by itself. We reject that."

Saddam and Ibrahim then chanted "Long live Iraq, long live the Arab state."

Ibrahim stood up and shouted: "Why don't you just execute us and get rid of all of this!"

When the judge explained that he was ruling in accordance with the law, Saddam replied: "This is a law made by America and does not reflect Iraqi sovereignty."

It was the third court session in the trial of Saddam and seven co-defendants — accused in the 1982 killings after an assassination attempt against the president in Dujail — where Saddam at times appeared to be in control of the court as much as the presiding judge.

After the lawyers spoke, Mohammed began his emotional but often rambling testimony. He said that after an assassination attempt on Saddam, security agencies took people of all ages, from 14 to more than 70. They were tortured for 70 days at intelligence headquarters in Baghdad before being moved to Abu Ghraib prison where the abuse continued, he said.

"There were mass arrests. Women and men. Even if a child was 1-day-old, they used to tell his parents, 'Bring him with you,'" Mohammed said. He said he was taken to a security center where "I saw bodies of people from Dujail."

"They were martyrs I knew," Mohammed said, giving the names of the nine whose bodies were there.

The second witness, Jawad, who was only 10 when the assassination attempt occurred, testified how Iraqi troops used helicopters to attack the city and bulldozers to destroy the fields.

Jawad said Saddam's regime killed three of his brothers, one before the assassination attempt and two after.

When al-Dulaimi asked how someone who was 10 could remember such details, Jawad said "a 3-year-old child remembers a lot. An elementary school student does not forget if a teacher slapped him in the face. I live a catastrophe."

After the walkout and a 90-minute recess to resolve the issue, the court reconvened and Amin allowed Clark and ex-Qatari Justice Minister Najib al-Nueimi to speak on the questions of the legitimacy of the tribunal and safety of the lawyers.

"Reconciliation is essential," Clark told the court. "This trial can either divide or heal. And unless it is seen as absolutely fair, and as absolutely fair in fact, it will irreconcilably divide the people of Iraq."

At that point, the judge reminded Clark that he was to speak only about the security guarantees for the defense lawyers — two of whom have been assassinated since the trial began Oct. 19.

Clark then said all parties were entitled to protection, and the measures offered to protect the defense and their families were "absurd." He said that without such protection, the judicial system would collapse.

Al-Nueimi then spoke about the legitimacy issue, arguing that court is not independent and was in fact set up under the U.S.-led occupation rather than by a legal Iraqi government. He said the language of the statute was unchanged from that promulgated by the former top U.S. administrator in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, and was therefore "illegitimate."

The first witness had exchanged insults with Ibrahim, Saddam's half brother, telling him "you killed a 14-year-old boy."

"To hell," Ibrahim replied.

"You and your children go to hell," the witness replied.

The judge then asked them to avoid such exchanges.

As the testimony continued, Saddam's lawyers objected that someone in the visitors' gallery was making threatening gestures and should be removed. Ibrahim leapt to his feet, spat in the direction of the gallery, and shouted, "These are criminals."

The judge ordered the person removed from the gallery and questioned.

Mohammed, fighting back tears, described how there had been "random arrests in the streets, all the forces of the (Baath) party, and Thursday became `Judgment Day' and Dujail has become a battle front."

"Shootings started and nobody could leave or enter Dujail. At night, intelligence agents arrived headed by Barazan" Ibrahim, he said.

Ibrahim interrupted him at one point, saying: "I am a patriot and I was the head of the intelligence service of Iraq."

At the start of Monday's session, Saddam walked into the court with a smile, carrying a copy of the Quran and greeted everyone there. Most of the defendants and several of the defense lawyers, including Clark, stood up out of respect when Saddam entered.




whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0