Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
Here's what she said in her book...
Quote:

...
Coulter writes in a new book, “Godless: The Church of Liberalism,” that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act “as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them.”

She also wrote, “I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much.”



For those that are rationalizing Coulter's cheap shot, exactly what would be crossing the line into unacceptable? Is this how you would like to be treated if somebody doesn't agree with you? CBSNews


We must never forget 9/11, unless family members of victims want to ask questions.




Funny that niether of you read teh book in question and even know what point was being made, you just jump on something you don;t like and sounds nasty, but in acctuallity you're making her point for her. Her point was that teh left puts up human shields of suffering, that people who have suffered can say what ever they want in the public sphere and we can't quetion it or challenge them.

If people choose to enter the public debate then they can be challenged. Suffering does not give you a "get out of debate free card"

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k