Wikipedia has a set of editors who cull biased entries. It is intended to be an agenda-free source of information: if there are arguments for and against a topic, both are included. Setting aside the mission of Wikipedia, reading both sides of an argument is more persuasive than a mere, bald assertion of facts which happen to fit a certain contention.
I'll write more in a few days - we've got a typhoon passing through here and I've got to get home...
