Article 2, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution sets the requirements one must meet in order to become President:
1) They must be a natural-born citizen of the United States,
2) Thirty-five years of age and
3) A resident of the United States for 14 years.
We're fast approaching a time when otherwise-eligible parties could possibly be excluded using the first requirement. The first test-tube baby in the US will reach the age of eligibilty within 15 years, I believe. Using the above phrasing, would such a candidate be considered a "natural-born" citizen? Schemantics, I'm sure, but we're looking at a country where the former President argued the definition of "is"...
Is this an issue waiting to happen? Should the wording be updated to allow for scientific advances in conception?
Just looking for some input on what's been a lively lunchtime discussion at work...