Quote:

The Time Trust said:
If so, nobody but you and Pro has said anything about it. Besides, this isn't up for debate. I'm grooming Axel to become my new Vanguard character. Who else had to ask for permission on how to construct their character?!? Axel may not be your "cup o' tea," but that's your opinion -- don't speak for the entire group. This just seems like nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking, Doc.


Apparently, you misunderstood what I said. I said, logically, it would be hard for most people, including the personalities in this group, to accept a child as a member of the group as far as putting a 12 year-old into harms way. I did not say that you couldn't do it or that we won't let you. I simply stated a large hurtle that you don't seem to have thought about yet and need to address when you decide to move him in.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."