Quote:

Pariah said:
Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
Pariah, now you're arguing semantics.

it was a good episode. Obviously the producers used it to wrap up Batman Beyond (which was cancelled suddenly), but as a fan of Batman Beyond I don't mind.
The JLU storyline was wrapped up last week.



No. It's not semantics. It's the same subject I've been arguing the whole time. They're implying that Batman is a hereditary trait--And that's idiotic. End of story.

As for the ending of BB: You're prolly right, but that doesn't make things better. Just worse. Although, it does reaffirm my point that it's an elseworlds.


You are arguing semantics. You're conceding that fate plays a role in heroes becoming heroes, but that the son of Batman having the traits of his father is stupid.

Amanda Waller said Terry had his father's stubborness and compassion, those are character traits that can be inherited. She made a point to mention he didn't have the genius that Bruce did.

Fate stepped in by leading Terry to Bruce, so of course he'd become Batman that way. The way you're arguing it makes it seem like you think Terry was destined to be Batman had he never met Bruce or even heard of Batman.
That would've been stupid.

Bow ties are coool.